Free Markets, Free People

More blacks running as Republicans

More blacks are running for Congress as Republicans this year than at any time since Reconstruction.  32 in fact.  And, as the article notes, these aren’t the “fringy” types , but experienced legislators or military veterans, etc.   Almost all of them attribute their desire and possibility of success to the fact that Barack Obama was elected president:

Princella Smith, who is running for an open seat in Arkansas, said she viewed the president’s victory through both the lens of history and partisan politics. “Aside from the fact that I disagree fundamentally with all his views, I am proud of my nation for proving that we have the ability to do something like that,” Ms. Smith said.

Democrats, of course, are skeptical:

But Democrats and other political experts express skepticism about black Republicans’ chances in November. “In 1994 and 2000, there were 24 black G.O.P. nominees,” said Donna Brazile, a Democratic political strategist who ran Al Gore’s presidential campaign and who is black. “And you didn’t see many of them win their elections.”

Tavis Smiley, a prominent black talk show host who has repeatedly criticized Republicans for not doing more to court black voters, said, “It’s worth remembering that the last time it was declared the ‘Year of the Black Republican,’ it fizzled out.”

And of course there’s the little problem of race – not necessarily from the right as Democrats would like to portray, but among blacks themselves. Walter Williams has a few words to say about that:

What about blacks who cherish liberty and limited government and joined in the Tea Party movement, or blacks who are members of organizations such as the Lincoln Institute, Frederick Douglass Foundation and Project 21? They’ve been maligned as Oreos, Uncle Toms and traitors to their race. To make such a charge borders on stupidity, possibly racism.

After all, when President Reagan disagreed with Tip O’Neill, did either charge the other with being a traitor to his race? Then why is it deemed traitorous when one black disagrees with another, unless you think that all blacks must think alike?

What about these candidates relationship with Tea Parties? Again race is brought into the question:

Many of the candidates are trying to align themselves with the Tea Partiers, insisting that the racial dynamics of that movement have been overblown. Videos taken at some Tea Party rallies show some participants holding up signs with racially inflammatory language.

A recent New York Times/CBS News poll found that 25 percent of self-identified Tea Party supporters think that the Obama administration favors blacks over whites, compared with 11 percent of the general public.

The black candidates interviewed overwhelmingly called the racist narrative a news media fiction. “I have been to these rallies, and there are hot dogs and banjos,” said Mr. West, the candidate in Florida, a retired lieutenant colonel in the Army. “There is no violence or racism there.”

However, the media will continue to try to make them “racist” events despite all evidence to the contrary.

The Obama election was signficiant in many ways, but one of the ways least anticipated was seeing conservative blacks empowered to run as such and be considered serious main-stream candidates. It also demonstrates that the black vote is maturing and becoming both more sophisticated and a more fractured vote – no longer a single bloc that will unquestionably vote for the candidate with a “D” by their name. Again, Walter Williams points out that if any group ought to be distrustful of government and want a smaller and less intrusive one, it should be blacks:

Having recently reached 74 years of age, if one were to ask me what’s my greatest disappointment in life, a top contender would surely be the level of misunderstanding, perhaps contempt, that black Americans have for the principles of personal liberty and their abiding faith in government.

Contempt or misunderstanding of the principles of personal liberty and faith in government by no means make blacks unique among Americans. But the unique history of black Americans should make us, above all other Americans, most suspicious of any encroachment on personal liberty and most distrustful of government.


The most serious injustices suffered by blacks came at the hands of government, at different levels, with its failure to protect personal liberty. Slavery was only the most egregious example of that failure.

Williams points out that government aided and abetted slavery – the Fugitive Slave act of 1850, Dred Scott, Jim Crow Laws, and Plessy v. Ferguson as only the most egregious examples. But, as he further notes, perhaps the biggest and most damaging government failure has been the public schooling blacks have been delivered which, for the most part, has failed to deliver on its promise for decades.

Then there’s the grossly fraudulent education delivered by the government schools that serve most black communities. The average black high school senior has a sixth- or seventh-grade achievement level, and most of those who manage to graduate have what’s no less than a fraudulent diploma, one that certifies a 12th-grade level of achievement when in fact the youngster might not have half that.

If the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan wanted to sabotage black academic excellence, he could not find a more effective means to do so than the government school system in most cities.

This new crop of black political hopefuls represent a change in thinking that black voters should welcome and support. They represent an awakening and a rejection of the situation that past bloc support of blacks has enabled. They represent a group which are saying no to the Democratic plantation and the “government is the answer” crowd. They’re pushing self-reliance and individual liberty over dependence. And let’s face it – that’s the way our of poverty or a disadvantaged situation – not depending on nameless and faceless bureaucrats to lift you out or change your circumstances.

So I see this as an important and welcome change among black voters. Whereas Barack Obama’s election did indeed signal the fact that America can and would look beyond skin color for the highest office in the land, the election of a number of black GOP candidates this year would be similarly significant and help shatter a very carefully crafted and decades old myth about the GOP.



Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

8 Responses to More blacks running as Republicans

  • Barack Obama’s election did indeed signal the fact that America can and would look beyond skin color for the highest office in the land

    I disagree.  Barack Obama is President only because he’s black.  Had he been white, he would never even have made it to the primaries, nevermind winning the general.  Before the election, I had several Dem friends urging me to vote for him  because it would be ‘revolutionary’ or ‘historic’ or similar such rot.  When I asked them if they were seriously suggesting I should support him based on the color of his skin rather the (nonexistent) content of his character, they stammered to a halt — but they still voted for him.
    In a way, it’s a tragedy (above and beyond the damage that  incompetent, egotistical boob is doing to the country).  America’s first black President could have been someone smart and capable, someone who’d go down in history as worthy of respect and admiration.  Instead we’ll be looking back forever on a failure of an affirmative action hire.

    • The hype was ridiculous. The reality unreported.

      But beyond those mechanics and what they suggest merely about process, there is something profoundly and deeply wrong about how this man became president. And I don’t think that the full picture has emerged.

      I’ve characterized this entire event of Obama becoming president as a KGB thought experiment becoming reality. It starts at catastrophe and the failure of American democracy. We’ll see where it goes from there.

    • Don’t get you teat in a wringer.
      I see this “Obama signaled ..” stuff as just the usual election year fluff.
      Hey .. I mean .. they do hope to get some Black votes and this is what it takes to blow smoke up …

      • … and I guess selling yourself as …

        with the Blackness of Obama and more sense than any 5 White House employees

        … may seem a sure thing, but with a little nuance, you might get those 5 White House employees to vote for you.

  • “In 1994 and 2000, there were 24 black G.O.P. nominees,” said Donna Brazile, a Democratic political strategist who ran Al Gore’s presidential campaign and who is black. “And you didn’t see many of them win their elections.”

    >>>> Um……so if they were the GOPs nominees, it’s not the GOPs fault they didn’t get elected.  It stands to reason that the same GOP voters who nominated them also voted for them in the general. So who are the people who voted against these qualified black candidates? Hmmm….

    • She’s implying that those Neanderthal Republicans won’t vote for a black candidate, even if he’s in their own party.

      But, as you point out, Republicans are not the only voters out there.

  • I do wish we could get past skin color in this country.  Voting for or against a person because of his skin color is bloody stupid.

    I’m sorry to say that identity politics has become mainstream in our country, however, thanks in no small part to MiniTru and the dems who, lacking an constructive policies, have to have SOME reason to get people to vote for them.  Back in the days of Jim Crow, it was the bloody shirt and fear of the savage Negro.  Now, it’s the bloody coat hanger and fear of racist whitey.  Unfortunately, the GOP has bought into it, too, and hence the party is saddled with that damned fool Steele as chairman.

  • I agree that the election of Obama was in some ways a great watershed for race relations in the USA.  But with his track record, it might be another 230 years before we have another black president. (that’s a joke son)