Free Markets, Free People

Communism kills–always has, always will

I know – once again I’ve managed to shock you haven’t I?


All that’s really happened is there is now proof that is hard to ignore or deny. Communism (simply a brand of "totalitarianism") kills and China is – I was going to say "living proof" but that would be inappropriate – is proof.

Remember the Mao inspired "Great Leap Forward" launched in 1958 Communist China? It was the forced "communization" of the population which had resisted it up until then. I.e. the people were pushed into communes where, they were told, life would be infinitely better because, well, because Mao said so.

Now it appears some initial estimates may have been a little low about the number of lives that forced move cost.

Historians have known for some time that the Great Leap Forward resulted in one of the world’s worst famines. Demographers have used official census figures to estimate that some 20 to 30 million people died. But inside the archives is an abundance of evidence, from the minutes of emergency committees to secret police reports and public security investigations, that show these estimates to be woefully inadequate.

Yes, I agree, that’s criminal. It is monstrously criminal.  Why?  Well obviously the force used to make people do what the state decided to do makes it criminal.  What makes it monstrously criminal?  Well the number of people that died from it and this:

In all, the records I studied suggest that the Great Leap Forward was responsible for at least 45 million deaths.

Between 2 and 3 million of these victims were tortured to death or summarily executed, often for the slightest infraction. People accused of not working hard enough were hung and beaten; sometimes they were bound and thrown into ponds. Punishments for the least violations included mutilation and forcing people to eat excrement.

They were tortured to death or summarily executed because they disagreed with who should run their lives or for doing something that those who had assumed control of their lives (by force) decided was deserving of capital punishment.

Like these:

One report dated Nov. 30, 1960, and circulated to the top leadership — most likely including Mao — tells how a man named Wang Ziyou had one of his ears chopped off, his legs tied up with iron wire and a 10-kilo stone dropped on his back before he was branded with a sizzling tool. His crime: digging up a potato.

When a boy stole a handful of grain in a Hunan village, the local boss, Xiong Dechang, forced his father to bury his son alive on the spot. The report of the investigative team sent by the provincial leadership in 1969 to interview survivors of the famine records that the man died of grief three weeks later.

Yes, these are the brutal and criminal acts of a ideology that holds the “rights” of the state far above any rights for individuals.  An ideology that many collectivist fellow travelers right here in the US used to defend as the humane answer to capitalism and the “cult” of the individual.  And make no mistake the USSR was no better.  It too resorted to forced collectivization.  In the Ukraine alone, it is estimated that 3.1 to 7 million died from the famine the forced collectivization induced.  In the Soviet Union, almost 2 million kulaks – probably what we would describe as “middle class farmers” were transported to the Gulags or executed.  All their land was confiscated and collectivized.  It wasn’t hard to become an “enemy of the people” just by being born to the wrong people or having worked hard to get ahead.

And as the artificial shortage they call “famine” worsened, what do you suppose those who represented the state did in China (and most likely the USSR)?  They used it to continue the oppression of the people and extend their control.  It became of tool of dominance and it cost many, many people their lives:

Starvation was the punishment of first resort. As report after report shows, food was distributed by the spoonful according to merit and used to force people to obey the party. One inspector in Sichuan wrote that “commune members too sick to work are deprived of food. It hastens their death.”

Imagine that – purposely starving people to death if they wouldn’t cooperate or were too sick to work.   Any guess as to what that drove some too?

One police investigation from Feb. 25, 1960, details some 50 cases in Yaohejia village in Gansu: “Name of culprit: Yang Zhongsheng. Name of victim: Yang Ecshun. Relationship with Culprit: Younger Brother. Manner of Crime: Killed and Eaten. Reason: Livelihood Issues.”

‘”Livelihood issues?  Good lord.  And what did the icon of the collectivist fellow travelers have to say about all of this?

At a secret meeting in Shanghai on March 25, 1959, he ordered the party to procure up to one-third of all the available grain — much more than ever before. The minutes of the meeting reveal a chairman [Mao] insensitive to human loss: “When there is not enough to eat people starve to death. It is better to let half of the people die so that the other half can eat their fill.”

Freakin’ amazing.  For those who continue to wear their Mao T’s there’s your hero and his accomplishments in spades.  And he’s absolutely no different than Che or Fidel or any of the rest of the murdering scum that brought the collectivist, murderous totalitarian socialism known as communism to power.

They should forever be relegated to the same status as Adolf Hitler because in every way they were as bad, if not worse, than he was.



Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

20 Responses to Communism kills–always has, always will

  • And, always remember, Fidel and Che would have…if they COULD have…done the same.
    History awaits the exact numbers in North Korea.

  • I wonder if we will ever see the Chinese equivalent of The Gulag Archipelago.

  • Don’t forget that Bill Ayers and those lovely folks from the Weather Underground figured that after the revolution 25 million Americans would have to be “eliminated” in the reeducation centers.

  • This is why the elite must be isolated in an enclave, where they can make remotely decisions for the good of the nation away from the suffering that some of their decisions might inevitably, and regrettably (of course) cause.
    Sounds like DC.

  • Guess what’s taught in our schools by “Union” teachers?
    They teach how terrible Capitalism is, coupled with a total white wash of Communism.
    What’s the message?  De-facto  approval of Communism!

  • Oh guys, just remember, it would be different here.
    We wouldn’t make those mistakes, we wouldn’t DO those kinds of things.
    The moon ponies and care bears would stop us from being bad and everything would be wonderful and everyone would be nice to one another.

    • Well except for the 25 million that we’d have to kill in order to allow the moon ponies and care bears to take over. And note – it’s just 25 million. Not 45.

      • Wull, yeah
        But that was THEN.  Our population has increased…so the numbers would…with regret…be higher now.
        But you can’t make an omelet…

      • I thought for a moment about pointing out to the care bear crowd that is all for socialism that at some point they’d have to come out of their safe coastal/liberal enclaves and ‘administrate’ here in the hinterlands.  The unwashed  corrupt republican democracy clingers will need to be instructed in how to feed the moon ponies and hug the care bears of social progress properly.   No doubt that job might otherwise fall to less Care Bearish minions from the hinterlands who aren’t quite as socially progressive, and who might decide that their unwashed redneck brethren in fly over country needed to learn a lesson in caring about their fellow man through sacrifice.  They might have to, uh, do some things that would upset the more tender hearted members of the coastal bastions of social liberalism and progressive thought in order to reach our goals of hugs for all under socialism.
        No doubt something of that nature happened in Russia and China you know, benighted bad people middle man types caused those problems, the leaders, never.  After all Stalin was known for his kindness and openness, as was Lenin, and while I haven’t read a lot about Dear Leader Mao other than the capitalistic propaganda taught to me as a child, I suspect he was also a kind, benevolent and wonderful man too.

        • I remember Garry Trudeau’s Donnesbury tribute to Mao when Uncle Duke comforts Honey, his Chinese companion, who is distraught after Mao’s death. Fairly sickening to look back upon.

  • I wonder where the anguish of that many people being murdered goes. The chill of the Holocaust remains with us sixty years later, as it should, in part because as Americans, Europeans and Jews it happened to us. We know people who were related to those who died in the camps and those who liberated the camps. Plus, of course, that facts of the camps have been documented in print and in movies voluminously.

    But the holocausts under communism remain largely unknown in the West and I wonder how they are remembered in East Europe and Asia. Aside from Solzhenitsyn, I have no idea.

    I wish I could agree.  Facts on the ground tell me otherwise.
    Now we are being told that a nuclear attack by terrorists is quite survivable.

    • Oh, take heart Rags, more than likely the persons telling you it can be survived are in the areas where it will occur. 

      Who would want to blow up Houston or Dallas(although I’m told our ‘gentlemen’s clubs’ are top notch, a sure draw for fundamentalist Islamic martyrs when the glitter of Broadway calls and the chic of Rodeo Drive beckons.

      • Actually, Houston is a prime target.  It is certainly one that would be high on my list from a strategic point of view.  I won’t go into why that is true, just that it is.

        • Ah, yes, but YOU’RE rational Rags.
          Houston isn’t much on the world vision “where I want to go in America!” city list.  New York, Washington, LA, maybe Chicago.
          I have friends in Boston who think you have to lift the cuffs of your rawhide pants over your cowboy boots when crossing the dirt streets here in the average Texas big city.
          When you go to Allah, and tell him you martyred yourself at the “Hobby Center for Performing Arts” he’s NOT going to be properly impressed with your efforts, and no doubt your virgin allocation will reflect his disdain.   He will probably sarcastically  ask you if you killed more horses than unbelievers.

          • I’m not so sure.  I think it might be more like, “Wow!  You managed to kill a Texan before he got you first???  Gold star for you, young man!”

            Then again, it might be more like, “Oh, SH*T!!!  Abdul, you fool, don’t you know what you’ve done???  THOSE PEOPLE SHOOT BACK!!!!”