Free Markets, Free People

What difference does it make!?

It’s a really good question, given we were apparently purposely lied too by the President and Secretary of State as to the “why” of Benghazi:

New documents obtained by Judicial Watch and made public Monday show that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other senior officials under President Obama were given intelligence within hours of the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack describing how it had been planned at least 10 days in advance “to kill as many Americans as possible.”

A heavily redacted copy of a Sept. 12, 2012, Defense Intelligence Agency memo to Clinton, then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, the White House National Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of Staff said “the attack was planned 10 or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for U.S. killing of Aboyahiye ((ALALIBY)) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 atacks on the World Trade Center buildings.”

The attack “was planned and executed by the Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman (BCOAR). BCOAR is also responsible for past attacks on the Red Cross in Benghazi and the attack on the British Ambassador, they have approximately 120 members.” Rahman is serving a life sentence in a federal prison for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center which killed six people in New York.

The memo was labeled: “Information Report, Not Finally Evaluated Intelligence.”

“Not finally evaluated” but certainly much more plausible than some video made by some clown in CA.  And per the memo, both Obama and Clinton knew this within hours of the attack.

So, what difference does it make?  Well, quite a bit to anyone with an sense of morality about them. It points to blatant dishonesty to hide their incompetence.  But to partisan hacks and the left, it probably doesn’t mean much that they stood by the coffins of the 4 slain in Benghazi and spun a web of lies.

Has that sunk in yet? Your former Secretary of State told you a bald-faced lie and now would like to be your President.

Tell me how she’ll be truthful about everything from now on, won’t you?

Oh, wait … emails …

~McQ

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

24 Responses to What difference does it make!?

  • And lots of donations to her fund that they forgot to mention….

    Yeah, if Hillary lies, after six (plus, considering they lied about him all through the 1st campaign) years of Obama lies doesn’t demonstrate they don’t care as long as they win, then nothing ever will.

    We should just be grateful that the various gangs who had their “spontaneous” fight in Waco didn’t have the foresight to bring mortar tubes and rounds like the Libyans did on 9/11/2012

    • We really have to ask just who comes out a winner if the Clintons are destroyed.
      Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe that an enemy of my enemy is my friend, but rather another foe.
      So, who comes out of this, I do mean another Democrat, if the Clintons are destroyed ?
      I suggest you take a look at who didn’t jump to support the Democratic nominee apparent so far ? .. like Mr Obama for instance, but don’t stop there.

      • I’m not normally conspiracy minded, but I have begun to wonder if Obama/Jarrett are trying to arrange things so that they get to select the Democratic nominee. It would fit their infinite thirst for power.

        If we find out they have been pimping in the shadows for a non-obvious candidate between now and year end, we’ll know.

        • I’ve been saying for many months that we need to watch MoooOOOooochele. But after the Tuskegee speech, I think she’s out of the running. She went full Rev. Wright. You NEVER go full Rev. Wright, man.

        • That’s a good bet.
          Makes you wonder if the whole Fauxcohauntas resists Obama on the trade agreement is kabuki.

          However – consider another angle.
          Big Ears intends to live in the US after his reign ends. An yet we’re now a super power which he has worked hard to destroy and destabilize.
          It may be that he is the sort of personality who will almost literally cut his nose off to spite his face.
          And I’m sure “he would have been getting us coffee” and “Three AM Phone Call” and the other comments about race and inexperience with regards to ‘The anointed One’ have neither been forgotten or forgiven.
          Obama is a spiteful petty little bugger if there ever was one.

          We’re thinking there has to be a purpose in the destruction that supersedes revenge and satisfaction because we’re looking and thinking long game.
          We may be giving him, again, way more credit than he is due.

          • Your last two sentences are bang on.

            Remember, in 1960/1970s Hawaii the pecking order was:

            1. Native Hawaiian;
            2. Asian
            3. White
            4. Black
            5. Mixed white/black? The lowest of the low. Utter contempt.

  • They knew “the day after,” did they? But the White House opted for “the video did it” explanation, which has long struck me as something that was ready in advance. The DIA memo says the plan was concocted ten days in advance, raising the question that if you can know there was a plan the day after the attack, when confusion was in the air, why it wouldn’t have been known in advance? It would seem to be much more difficult to squeeze a source that quickly as opposed to having sources who were coming to you with the goods before an attack. Am I being clear?

    Anyway, Stevens was very specifically targeted and the knowledge of the facility by the attackers was detailed. Almost like the “terrorists” were trained by professionals, or were led by professionals.

    And the White House went with “the video did it,” and used that repeatedly through several news cycles, while it had this other report.

    And Stevens was the objective within the objective. No help was available. The scene was left for pickers for what was it, ten days, before the FBI showed up.

    Yeah, it all makes sense.

    • Yeah, it all makes sense.

      Yeah, to escapees from the Funny Farm…

  • Just like it made sense to pull a crack security team protecting our diplomats while there were requests pending for more security.

    It might all add up if you recall that Stevens was flapping his jaws (actually sending emails) about how Libya was a falling apart mess. During an election year when Libya was a “great foreign policy achievement.”

  • You know there’s another aspects of this that aren’t played up and lost in the haze now that we’re no longer in the moment.

    It happened on the anniversary of 9/11, it happened in a trashed out Islamic state courtesy of the US ‘leading from behind’ during the ‘Arab Spring’.
    The latest data indicates those of us crazy enough to think we were there to facilitate moving weapons from Libya to Syria weren’t whacko conspiracy theorists after all.

    The dust of time are covering up information that combines to make it all even worse than an attack on a US consulate/embassy.
    When you ask yourself again, why the hell weren’t they on highest alert in an Islamic disaster area like Libya on the freaking anniversary of 9/11?
    And then to lie about it for weeks on end and hang it on a YouTube video.

    But “what difference does it make” is really has been the Clinton MO all along – they’re so very good when it comes to making sure they’ve buried Habeas F. Corpus.

  • Yeahbut BUSH…..

    The right has issues, but the left is, top to bottom and side to side, entirely made up of infantile whores. And these are the primitive thugs that would rule (not govern) us.

    The fallout and the aftermath will make the Dark Ages look and feel like a trip to Disneyland.

  • The lie- in front of the coffins of the dead, to the face of a grieving mother- was bad enough, but can we PLEASE remember the worst part- these cretins had the filmmaker hauled out of his house and jailed. To be sure they had a charge as pretext to hsul him in, but make no mistake what Obama and Hillary did here.

    • Given the number of laws and regulations that we’re completely unaware of – exactly how hard would they have to work to haul any one of us out of our houses and have us jailed?

      Yeah.

  • Well, the legendary, lengthening legion litany of lies jus’ keepa gettin’ lengthier…

    http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/18/nyt-banned-from-state-dept-clinton-foundation-crony-advised-hillary-on-libya-while-trying-to-drum-up-business-there/

    Sid “Vicious” Blumenthal is a notorious, flaming anti-Semite, among lots of other nasty things. This is really uuuuuugly.

  • “… it had been planned at least 10 days in advance “to kill as many Americans as possible.”

    This was a video, I suppose ?

  • Let’s face it gents – Hillary could lop off Obama’s head on live TV and she’d still get 30% of the vote.

    Wait a minute…

    Oh, never mind.

  • The problem is that we could do worse. We did last time. If anything, the unwillingness to oppose, alone, has made it worse.

  • About those deleted emails… Michael Morell in “The Great War of Our Times” said in a recent interview with Hugh Hulett that SoS Clinton’s non-classified email server(s) was, with certainty, hacked. The bad players have the ability to hack any non-secured private servers with ease. Ex-Deputy Morell feels certain Clinton’s non-secured server(s) were compromised.

    If Judicial Watch really wants those emails, they should contact the Chinese/Russian/Koreans and pay them for the emails. They would certainly get a better response than a FoIA request with the treacherous regime now in office.
    Now it turns out, according to Matt Drudge, SoS Clinton had multiple non-secured email servers for foreign bad players to freely hack. Maybe we could get a fund-raiser going to bribe the hackers for the documents?

    • Considering it was e-mail from those folks, they already had copies. But revealing where they sent the checks may make things interesting. If you were one of those folks, would you interfere with Ms. Clinton’s assent?

      • Nah, you don’t kill the goose for them golden eggs when you can blackmail her into handing you a few gratis.
        Is it still okay to use the word black in this context, or should I have posted a dog whistle trigger warning first?

        • The fact you said ‘male’ even if only via homonym, is a bigger trigger. Racism is so last year, this year its misogyny.

  • The most discouraging aspect of moon-bat, liberal-left-lunacy is Clinton could stomp puppies on-stage and her low-information voters would rush to her defense to suggest why stomping puppies was not only necessary, but a good thing.

    • Middle Eastern evil dictator Qaddafi puppies, they needed stompin!
      This demonstrated that America loves the young upcoming non-dictator cell phone using middle eastern islamic puppies who were going to bring about puppy spring and doggie democracy!

      Do YOU support evil dictator Qaddafi puppies you sexist!

  • This explains a lot …

    In Memo, Blumenthal Initially Blames Demonstrators for Attacks

    The day after the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on American outposts in Benghazi that killed Mr. Stevens and three other Americans, Mr. Blumenthal sent Mrs. Clinton a memo with his intelligence about what had occurred. The memo said the attacks were by “demonstrators” who “were inspired by what many devout Libyan viewed as a sacrilegious internet video on the prophet Mohammed originating in America.” Mrs. Clinton forwarded the memo to Mr. Sullivan, saying “More info.” (Pages 193-195)

    …. looks like ‘Mrs. Clinton’ believed Blumenthal over the CIA