Free Markets, Free People

Our society of victims

Anyone who has read QandO for any time at all knows I am fascinated by these sorts of topics.  This comes out of Reason’s “Hit & Run” blog.  It offers an explanation concerning what we’ve been watching happen over the last 20 to 30 years.  The change from a more self-reliant people who tried to be better to a growing culture of “victimhood”.

Some background first:

In honor cultures, people (men) maintained their honor by responding to insults, slights, violations of rights by self-help violence. Generally honor cultures exist where the rule of law is weak. In honor cultures, people protected themselves, their families, and property through having a reputation for swift violence. During the 19th century, most Western societies began the moral transition toward dignity cultures in which all citizens were legally endowed with equal rights. In such societies, persons, property, and rights are defended by recourse to third parties, usually courts, police, and so forth, that, if necessary, wield violence on their behalf. Dignity cultures practice tolerance and are much more peaceful than honor cultures.


Sociologists Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning are arguing that the U.S. is now transitioning to a victimhood culture that combines both the honor culture’s quickness to take offense with the dignity culture’s use of third parties to police and punish transgressions. The result is people are encouraged to think of themselves as weak, marginalized, and oppressed. This is nothing less than demoralizing and polarizing as everybody seeks to become a “victim.”

Indeed.  I’ve seen it any number of times personally over the years.  And, as you might imagine, this transition into the victimhood culture is becoming both extensive and actually supported by, well “victims” and those with some sort of pseudo-guilt.  The “white privilege” nonsense is a perfect example.  Cultural “appropriation” is another victimhood scam.

With that background, this is a very interesting explanation of what we have going on and where it is likely to lead (and, of course, note where the impact, at this moment in time, is the strongest and how well that’s going):

A) Microaggression as Overstratification
According to Black (2011), as noted above, changes in stratification, intimacy, and diversity cause conflict. Microaggression complaints are largely about changes in stratification. They document actions said to increase the level of inequality in a social relationship – actions Black refers to as “overstratification.” Overstratification offenses occur whenever anyone rises above or falls below others in status. [Therefore…] a morality that privileges equality and condemns oppression is most likely to arise precisely in settings that already have relatively high degrees of equality… In modern Western societies, egalitarian ethics have developed alongside actual political and economic equality.As women moved into the workforce in large numbers, became increasingly educated, made inroads into highly paid professions such as law and medicine, and became increasingly prominent in local, state, and national politics, sexism became increasingly deviant. The taboo has grown so strong that making racist statements, even in private, might jeopardize the careers of celebrities or the assets of businessmen (e.g., Fenno, Christensen, and Rainey 2014; Lynch 2013). [p.706-707] [In other words, as progress is made toward a more equal and humane society, it takes a smaller and smaller offense to trigger a high level of outrage. The goalposts shift, allowing participants to maintain a constant level of anger and constant level of perceived victimization.]

B) Microaggression as underdiversity
Microaggression offenses also tend to involve what Black calls “underdiversity” – the rejection of a culture. Large acts of underdiversity include things like genocide or political oppression, while smaller acts include ethnic jokes or insults. The publicizers of microaggressions are concerned with the latter, as well as more subtle, perhaps inadvertent, cultural slights…. Just as overstratification conflict varies inversely with stratification, underdiversity conflict varies directly with diversity (Black 2011:139). Attempts to increase stratification, we saw, are more deviant where stratification is at a minimum; likewise, attempts to decrease diversity are more deviant where diversity is at a maximum. In modern Western societies, an ethic of cultural tolerance – and often incompatibly, intolerance of intolerance – has developed in tandem with increasing diversity. Since microaggression offenses normally involve overstratification and underdiversity, intense concern about such offenses occurs at the intersection of the social conditions conducive to the seriousness of each. It is in egalitarian and diverse settings – such as at modern American universities – that equality and diversity are most valued, and it is in these settings that perceived offenses against these values are most deviant. [p.707]. [Again, the paradox: places that make the most progress toward equality and diversity can expect to have the “lowest bar” for what counts as an offense against equality and inclusivity. Some colleges have lowered the bar so far that an innocent question, motivated by curiosity, such as “where are you from” is now branded as an act of aggression.]

C) Victimhood as Virtue
When the victims publicize microaggressions they call attention to what they see as the deviant behavior of the offenders. In doing so they also call attention to their own victimization. Indeed, many ways of attracting the attention and sympathy of third parties emphasize or exacerbate the low status of the aggrieved. People portray themselves as oppressed by the powerful – as damaged, disadvantaged, and needy. [They describe such practices going back to ancient Rome and India] … But why emphasize one’s victimization? Certainly the distinction between offender and victim always has moral significance, lowering the offender’s moral status. In the settings such as those that generate microaggression catalogs, though, where offenders are oppressors and victims are the oppressed, it also raises the moral status of the victims. This only increases the incentive to publicize grievances, and it means aggrieved parties are especially likely to highlight their identity as victims, emphasizing their own suffering and innocence. Their adversaries are privileged and blameworthy, but they themselves are pitiable and blameless. [p.707-708] [This is the great tragedy: the culture of victimization rewards people for taking on a personal identity as one who is damaged, weak, and aggrieved. This is a recipe for failure — and constant litigation — after students graduate from college and attempt to enter the workforce].

Fascinating, frightning and enlightening.




Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

14 Responses to Our society of victims

  • More commentary on this over here.

  • This would seem to apply nicely to the Roanoke killer, who just made the transition BACK into the ‘honor culture’ from the ‘victimhood culture’. Not really much of a step…

    And it’s one that a lot of Collectivists would make, judging by what they say they would like to do.

  • I’m not sure but I think seeing Trump rise in the polls in an indication that a victimhood trainwreck is going to happen sooner than the victim practioneers would like.

    People are fast losing patience for the race card and claims of victimhood.
    This will surely become a case of “oh social death, where is thy sting”.
    If you have enough people embracing their SJW classified ‘evil’, like Trump did with the ‘anchor babies’ phrasing the sting is going to go out of it.
    When you’re told you’re a racist by virtue of your skin color assignment at birth, that is going to fail to be a useful weapon against you eventually.

  • Funny this goes to one of my …

    Questions we need to ask Presidential candidates:

    Are you a “victim” ? If so, why should anybody ever elect a “victim” as President and Leader of the Free World ?

    Explain how President Obama’s “Iran Deal” doesn’t undermine the fundamental soundness of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by having the Security Council allow a signing state to ignore the provisions and continue to enrich.

    How important are “renewables”, such as ethanol and bio-mass, to “sustainability” in your administration’s climate policy ?
    (This is a trick question because most sustainability efforts involve continued use of carbon-based energy whose production and use have an even larger carbon footprint)

    Explain the difference between Quds and Scuds.

    What is your plan to deal with a Higgs Boson disaster ?

    • Higgs Boson disaster.

      Is that like dealing with the anticipated capsizing of Guam?

      • Sort of … except most possible disaster scenarios involving Higgs Boson would happen so fast that there wouldn’t be enough time to assign blame (i.e. politically useless)

        • That’s one of those Churchill speeches – “We shall go on to the en…..(poof)”.

          “so fast that there wouldn’t be enough time to assign blame (i.e. politically useless)”
          Trust me, these clowns would still want to “do something” about it.

    • Interestingly enough the site Thales linked to had a link to that demonstration, with a rant about how there were already people ranting about it 🙂

    • Dear SJWs… sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Unless you’re a Clinton. But that wasn’t really exploitation, unlike using a pretty girl’s face for a demonstration.