Free Markets, Free People

“ISIS is contained”

Those words were uttered by President Obama prior to the Paris massacre by ISIS.  Politico argues that the words were in response to a specific question about territory ISIS controlled.  And, frankly, if that’s the argument I think it has some credibility.  However, in the same interview, Obama said:

Until Assad is no longer a lightning rod for Sunnis in Syria and the entire region is no longer a proxy war for Shia-Sunni conflict, we’re gunna continue to have problems. … with making sure that ISIL continues to shrink in its scope of operations until it no longer poses the kind of threat that it does, not just primarily to us, but to neighbors in the region[.]”

Just as clearly, that’s a claim that the administration and it’s allies in the region will keep up their operations to ensure that “ISIL continues to shrink its scope of operations” until it is no longer a threat.  While it may not specifically state that “ISIL is contained”, it certainly implies success in “continuing” to “shrink” ISIL/ISIS’s “scope of operations”.  To me, its pretty much the same claim as “ISIS is contained”.

However, as usual, reality trumps fantasy:

Since October 10, ISIS and its sympathizers around the world have killed at least 525 people in six attacks in six countries outside its so-called caliphate.

American counterterrorism officials say that of the six attacks, three were directed by ISIS from its territory in Syria and Iraq and another two were so-called “announcement” attacks — local ISIS elements revealing their existence in dramatic fashion.

Yes, that’s right, friends and neighbors, since October 10th, 525 people around the world have died as a result of this “shrinking” of ISIL/ISIS’s “scope of operations”.  525 in 6 separate attacks.  And the fact is, our “leader” was trying to peddle the notion that ISIL/ISIS was being controlled.

Does it sound like success in “shrinking” the “scope of operations” of this terrorist group?  Does it look like ISIL/ISIS is being controlled?

Most people would read it as a very large expansion of operations by a group largely out of anyone’s control on the opposition side.

But then, most people aren’t in “denial” (and if you’re wondering, remember the correct answer is “gun control”).


Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

8 Responses to “ISIS is contained”

  • “Mission Accomplished” – there is actual validity to story about the narrow scope of that banner. I guess it all depends who side the media is on.

  • I keep looking for Erp to show up and elaborate on his claim that ISIS could be easily defeated.

    Would part of that involve using the term “Islamic terrorism”? I kind of think it would have to, but maybe Erp could explain.


  • Hey, no muslim terrorists have killed anyone from the White House in these attacks, so the problem is ‘contained’.
    Even fundamentalist raving lunatics know you try not to kill off the people who support you.

    Meanwhile we’re going to pass laws to make it more illegal to do illegal things illegally.

    What WE need is a law that makes it illegal to break the law! We need to DOOOOOO SOMETHINGGGGGGG!

    Just remember though, don’t pop off about fixing this unless you have some ideas before you go spouting off!

    And I’ve taken that warning to heart. I’ve given it some thought, just like the President and his advisers.

    So, I will fix this problem by working harder to fix this problem!
    We will do our best! We will triumph by being better than the bad guys! We will win more by winning more!

  • OT on Benghazi …

    The Sept. 11, 2012, email was sent at 7:19 p.m. by then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash. The text reads:
    “After consulting with General Dempsey, General Ham and the Joint Staff, we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include a [REDACTED].

    • And they’ll be held to account for these lies by?

      If your first answer is Congress, you’ll get two other chances to say ‘no one’

  • ISIS and its sympathizers around the world have killed at least 525 people in six attacks in six countries outside its so-called caliphate.

    Don’t those six coutries have gun control?