Free Markets, Free People

The death knell of establishment politics?

As much as the media would like to cast what’s going on during the GOP presidential nomination process as a “crisis for the GOP”, the Dems have their own establishment crisis problem.  And it is getting very little media coverage.  But Kim Strassel talks about it today in her WSJ piece.  As much as the Democrats (and media) would like voters to believe the right is melting down and heading toward Tea Party land, it seems clear the left is getting ready to “Move On.”

On both sides, frustration with the establishment is the most evident feature:

Some of Mrs. Clinton’s struggles are self-imposed. She’s a real-world, political version of Pig-Pen, trailing along her own cloud of scandal dust. Even Democrats who like her don’t trust her. And a lot of voters are weary or unimpressed by the Clinton name. For all the Democratic establishment’s attempts to anoint Mrs. Clinton—to shield her from debates and ignore her liabilities—the rank and file aren’t content to have their nominee dictated.

Especially because many of those rank and file belong to a rising progressive movement that has no time or interest in the old Clinton mold. Barack Obama’s biggest legacy may prove his dismantling of the Democratic center. He ran as a uniter, but he governed as a divisive ideologue and as a liberal, feeding new fervor in the progressive wing.

These progressives proved more eager than even the Republicans to steadily pick off Democratic moderates—and helped the GOP to decimate their ranks. The Democratic congressional contingent is now at its smallest size since before FDR. But boy is it pure, and it retains an unwavering belief that its path to re-election is to double down on the Obama agenda.

I have to admit loving the characterization of Hillary as “Pig Pen”.  That notwithstanding, you’d think Hillary, who has prepared for this since Bill first stepped into the White House, would be a natural choice of the left.  But then how does one explain the rise of someone who uses the term “socialist” to describe himself because communist would likely be a bridge too far?  It’s because the left and right have drifted further apart over the years and the “establishment” of both parties has been set adrift.  It’s because to more and more Americans (who didn’t live during the Cold War and didn’t see the wreck the Soviet Union was when it imploded) are enamored with the idea of “equality” as the left now describes it.  Equal income, high minimum wage, free this and free that.  When you’re an economic illiterate, those things are appealing.  And when you further believe the government is the instrument of all things good, well, you’re on the road to serfdom.

Just as Donald Trump is busy calling out the GOP pretenders to the throne, the lefty heroes are undermining the chances of the anointed one:

The president insists that financial institutions were entirely to blame for the 2008 crisis, and that government’s role is to transfer more from those greedy capitalist owners to poor Americans. Out of this class warfare came the likes of Occupy Wall Street, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and today a Sanders campaign that describes “wealth and income equality” as the great “moral issue” of our time.

Mrs. Warren, a progressive hero, went out of her way last week to praise the Sanders Wall Street “reform” plan. Even Joe Biden wanted in on the action, lauding Mr. Sanders and suggesting that Mrs. Clinton was still “relatively new” to the income-inequality debate. Hillary is stuck trying to explain why her campaign donations from bankers aren’t a disqualifier.

The usual subjects have also rallied around the Clinton opposition:

These movements and activists (who also embrace the gun debate, and the women’s-rights debate, and socialized health-care debate) are now the beating heart of the Democratic Party. And they are rallying around Mr. Sanders. MoveOn.org has endorsed Bernie. The liberal Nation magazine has endorsed him. Bill McKibben, the head of 350.org, has endorsed him. Jodie Evans, the co-founder of the antiwar group Codepink has endorsed him. Celebrity activists like Susan Sarandon and Mark Ruffalo are feeling the Bern.

Now no one is saying that all that is enough.  But for both parties, if ever they figured out they had missed their wake up call, this is the season that drills that home.  For too long, both establishment parties have taken their voters for granted, essentially merged into a tax and spend entity that no one is satisfied with, and have missed the proverbial boat for government reform.  Of course, reform is defined differently by the right and left, but you get my point.

The party that is in trouble this year isn’t the GOP or the Democrats, per se.  It is the party of establishment politicians who’ve ignored the restless and frustrated voters one election too many.  People are tired of the Obamafication of politics – talk, talk, talk and then do what the hell you want to do.

We’ll see how it all turns out, but it is one of the more interesting political periods of my lifetime – and I’ve been around since Truman.

~McQ

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

5 Responses to The death knell of establishment politics?

  • It’s brewing up the perfect storm,

    again (which as a portent, this close behind the last perfect storm of Obama, is NOT a good omen)

    Hillary with Special Access level documentation on her unsecured ‘personal’ server (that would mean, rather than “Madam Secretary”, her title should be – “Felon”) and no one else on the horizon at this point leaves ‘The Bern’ as the candidate.

    and Trump is shaping up as the likely populist candidate….I hesitate to say the Republican candidate, but I think the wind is very strong from that direction at the moment.

    But while I can see the faux conservative huckster getting into office, is America really going to elect a declared ‘socialist’?
    The progs must think they’re some kind of majority, but that would be because they never actually deign to talk to anyone not in their ‘safe zone’ lest they hear things they don’t want to hear or have to think about things they don’t want to think about.
    No matter who else gets into office, we can expect them to stamp their little feet ‘vewy haaaaahd’ if their candidate doesn’t win.
    I wonder if we’ll have to hear about stolen elections and that sort of thing again.
    Interesting times.

    • “But while I can see the faux conservative huckster getting into office”

      I laugh when I hear a comment like this as if it separates Trump from the pack or something.

      • Good point – I won’t argue with that at all because it’s certainly true these days, and has been for a while now.

        Thanks for the reminder that when I say conservative, and the ruling party says ‘conservative’, we’re using the same word, but we’re not talking about the same thing.

  • I think you’ve made a mistake assuming that for the democrats the center is the establishment. The establishment has been far left since Dean took the top job in the DNC. Your simply witnessed a long coming purge of the moderates.

  • The distinction between T-rump and Cruz is already very apparent in Iowa.

    Duh Donald sold out to the Establishment for a few hoped-for caucus votes. He went full-tilt BIG CORN, and lied about his motives.

    Cruz stood by his free-market guns, in spite of being attacked from the LEFT by T-rump as “big oil”.

    It’s very clear…as the old song goes.