Free Markets, Free People

Stray Voltage

Heather Mac Donald explodes the “Black Lives Matter” myth – the myth the Democratic presidential candidates have decided to embrace:

For starters, fatal police shootings make up a much larger proportion of white and Hispanic homicide deaths than black homicide deaths. According to the Post database, in 2015 officers killed 662 whites and Hispanics, and 258 blacks. (The overwhelming majority of all those police-shooting victims were attacking the officer, often with a gun.) Using the 2014 homicide numbers as an approximation of 2015’s, those 662 white and Hispanic victims of police shootings would make up 12% of all white and Hispanic homicide deaths. That is three times the proportion of black deaths that result from police shootings.

The lower proportion of black deaths due to police shootings can be attributed to the lamentable black-on-black homicide rate. There were 6,095 black homicide deaths in 2014—the most recent year for which such data are available—compared with 5,397 homicide deaths for whites and Hispanics combined. Almost all of those black homicide victims had black killers.

Police officers—of all races—are also disproportionately endangered by black assailants. Over the past decade, according to FBI data, 40% of cop killers have been black. Officers are killed by blacks at a rate 2.5 times higher than the rate at which blacks are killed by police.

Read the whole thing.  Again, as with global warming, the facts don’t fit the theory.  And, as usual, the facts don’t matter when they bump up against election year rhetoric, ideology and the need to pander for votes.

The Washington Post’s Catherine Rampell has apparently noticed what’s going on at colleges and universities these days and has noticed a number of surveys which conclude:

Today’s students are indeed both more left wing and more openly hostile to free speech than earlier generations of collegians.

She notes that the surveys are mostly taken among incoming freshman and makes and interesting observation:

One parting observation: Remember that these survey questions were asked of newly matriculated college freshmen. That is, students are setting foot on campus already more liberal, more protest-happy and more amenable to speech restrictions than their predecessors.

Which suggests that colleges themselves are not wholly responsible for rising liberal and illiberal tendencies on campus — even if they do sometimes aid and abet both trends.

 Interesting point.

As for sources of indoctrination, how about this:

From the University of California, Irvine, “Teaching Climate and Sustainability: A Faculty Skills-Sharing Workshop”:

This workshop aims to engage, inspire, and support faculty members from across disciplines who are interested in voluntarily infusing relevant climate change and/or sustainability concepts into their courses. The overall goal of this curriculum program is to boost climate change/sustainability education at UCI, especially targeting those students for whom climate and sustainability may not be a focus.

Any guess as to what “theory” they’re pushing in terms of “climate change?”

Oh, and an incentive to indoctrinate.  You bet:

Incentive: Participating faculty members receive $1000 for completing the workshop and subsequent course revision. Faculty will also receive an additional $200 for attending a follow up Faculty Networking Event on Friday, November 4, 2016 to showcase their revised course material (note: revised courses do not need to be taught by November 4, 2016, however, course materials will need to be updated to include sustainability by this time).

Never mind that at a minimum, the AGW theory is controversial at best, here we have a ideological pressure group paying teachers to revise their courses and insert this controversial and obviously deeply flawed theory as “truth”.  It doesn’t get any more blatant than that.

In the “LOL, BS talks and money walks” department, the DNC comes through again … for Hillary.

The Democratic National Committee has rolled back restrictions introduced by presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008 that banned donations from federal lobbyists and political action committees.

The decision, which may provide an advantage to Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, was viewed with disappointment Friday morning by good government activists who saw it as a step backward in the effort to limit special interest influence in Washington.

With that and the Super Delegate game, they can now pretty much rig the game anyway they want too, can’t they?

Meanwhile, the war against CO2 is going … badly:

A new report by the oil giant BP shows CO2 emissions significantly growing, despite huge gains in energy efficiency and countries forcing more green energy onto the grid. It looks like economic growth in developing countries, like China and India, will overshadow global warming regulations in rich countries. “Despite the slowdown in emissions growth, the level of carbon emissions continues to grow, increasing by 20% between 2014 and 2035,” BP reported in its latest energy outlook.

That’s one reason these drastic rules in the US against CO2 are a fool’s game (yes, the one’s the Supreme Court issued a stay on).  Developing countries aren’t playing, and with them not playing, the desired result – less CO2 – isn’t happening.  What will happen though is economy strangling regulation if we allow it.

Have a great weekend!

~McQ

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditPin on PinterestEmail this to someone

4 Responses to Stray Voltage

  • In another interesting “we know exactly how this works!” demonstration of Global Warming cultism.

    NASA discovers “earth” absorbs water!
    In this case literally the earth that makes up Earth.
    They credit this odd unusual unexpected and surprising spongy effect with slowing the rise of the oceans – because otherwise their predictions would appear to be wrong.
    It would seem they think announcing this discovery means their prediction was right, sorta, but since the earth did something they didn’t expect their predictions are STILL right and they obviously know EXACTLY what they’re talking about darn it!

    I’m sure that spongy earth variable was factored into those models predicting that any minute now coastal America would find itself under water from all the melted ice caps and glaciers, they probably just assigned the wrong constants values.

  • Developing countries aren’t playing …

    But President Barack Obama got an agreement form the Chinese … to reduce CO2 emission when their economy cools down in 2020.

    • And meanwhile the American military will be developing horses for transport that don’t fart methane as part of their effort to focus on the imminent threat to National Security posed by Global Warming.