<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Questions and Observations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qando.net/index.php?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qando.net</link>
	<description>Free Markets, Free People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:52:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134555</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134555</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t go all mysterious on us.
We all know the way.  It&#039;s simple.  They resurrect Ted Kennedy from the grave.
Any God who can bring back Ted Kennedy (and obviously then must like Democrats) is not to be messed with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t go all mysterious on us.<br />
We all know the way.  It&#8217;s simple.  They resurrect Ted Kennedy from the grave.<br />
Any God who can bring back Ted Kennedy (and obviously then must like Democrats) is not to be messed with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? &#124; Liberal Whoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134553</link>
		<dc:creator>How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? &#124; Liberal Whoppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134553</guid>
		<description>[...] this link: How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this link: How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Statistics for 16 May 12 by Economic Statistics for 16 May 12 &#124; Liberal Whoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13028&#038;cpage=1#comment-134550</link>
		<dc:creator>Economic Statistics for 16 May 12 &#124; Liberal Whoppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13028#comment-134550</guid>
		<description>[...] original here: Economic Statistics for 16 May 12 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original here: Economic Statistics for 16 May 12 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? &#124; Liberal Whoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134549</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? &#124; Liberal Whoppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134549</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post: Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post: Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by QQQ - Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134548</link>
		<dc:creator>QQQ - Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134548</guid>
		<description>[...] Q&amp;O   Posted by Bird Dog in Quotidian Quotable Quote (QQQ) at 15:13 &#124; Comments (0) &#124; Trackbacks (0)                       Trackbacks  Trackback specific URI for this entry   No Trackbacks     Comments Display comments as (Linear &#124; Threaded)   No comments    Add Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Q&amp;O   Posted by Bird Dog in Quotidian Quotable Quote (QQQ) at 15:13 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)                       Trackbacks  Trackback specific URI for this entry   No Trackbacks     Comments Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)   No comments    Add Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My goodness &#8230;. this is just pitiful by Harun</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13024&#038;cpage=1#comment-134547</link>
		<dc:creator>Harun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13024#comment-134547</guid>
		<description>Maybe this is the effect of Wikipedia. Some young staffer thinks its okay to go in add some Obama stuff to older entries. I do note that Carter is mentioned in the except above - who put that in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is the effect of Wikipedia. Some young staffer thinks its okay to go in add some Obama stuff to older entries. I do note that Carter is mentioned in the except above &#8211; who put that in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Martin McPhillips</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134546</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McPhillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134546</guid>
		<description>Dale, if you haven&#039;t read it, try Daniel J. Flynn&#039;s &quot;A Conservative History of the American Left.&quot;

Some books I recommend as thumb-throughs, for skimming, have on the shelf for reference sorts of books. This one I like as a cover-to-cover read. It starts with the original communes circa 1825 and is like a map of a state of mind. In fact, when I&#039;m done with this latest from Goldberg and re-read &quot;1984,&quot; I&#039;m going to run through it again myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale, if you haven&#8217;t read it, try Daniel J. Flynn&#8217;s &#8220;A Conservative History of the American Left.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some books I recommend as thumb-throughs, for skimming, have on the shelf for reference sorts of books. This one I like as a cover-to-cover read. It starts with the original communes circa 1825 and is like a map of a state of mind. In fact, when I&#8217;m done with this latest from Goldberg and re-read &#8220;1984,&#8221; I&#8217;m going to run through it again myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134545</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134545</guid>
		<description>You have to ask the question, &lt;strong&gt;&quot;How would law enforcement respond if their communications were cut off ?&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
Jamming communications, even spread-spectrum communications aren&#039;t really that hard to jam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to ask the question, <strong>&#8220;How would law enforcement respond if their communications were cut off ?&#8221;</strong><br />
Jamming communications, even spread-spectrum communications aren&#8217;t really that hard to jam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by Martin McPhillips</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134543</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McPhillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134543</guid>
		<description>It *probably* followed along this pathway:

The gay mafia and the major gay advocacy groups had given it up for Obama in &#039;08 and have awaited the major paybacks: they got the repeal of Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell and they got Holder and the Justice Department doing nothing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. They also got the usual sympathetic gay appointments and gay friendly this and that. The trinkets of power.

Then came the marriage referendum in North Carolina, and the mafia et al. were pumping a lot of money in there, but they probably knew two-three weeks out that they were going to get clobbered. They were angry, as they always are, but they turned the anger on Obama. They wanted something that would blunt the big loss in North Carolina. They were probably also starting to worry that the whisper to &quot;wait until he is re-elected&quot; meant that all the money would be for nothing because his numbers suggested that he could very well lose. They demanded action.

Obama sent out Arne Duncan and Joe Biden to test the waters and things looked pretty clear, so after the North Carolina measure passed, Obama came out and blunted the effect by saying he supported &quot;gay marriage&quot; and that made everything wonderful again.

But I think it was the one real true mistake he has made (not counting the health care thing which he knew would hurt him but was too important to gaining more power over Americans to let it fail). It crossed through the national political discourse at the wrong time, in the wrong way, and he looked bad. It was transparently cheesy and this time there was no &quot;watch my hands&quot; effect where people simply yawned and took the post-hypnotic suggestion.

The way November stands now is that uncommitted or voters who are only leaning one way or the other are now looking for reasons not to vote for Obama and reasons to vote for Romney. This is already and old election, five and a half months before it happens. We could know by Labor Day who is going to win. People are sick of politics. They&#039;re getting sick of Obama. I know the *one* way that the Democrats, who I have taken to calling the human sacrifice and sodomy cult, could make a big comeback between Labor Day and the election, but I&#039;m not talking. (Remind me to tell you what it is after the election.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It *probably* followed along this pathway:</p>
<p>The gay mafia and the major gay advocacy groups had given it up for Obama in &#8217;08 and have awaited the major paybacks: they got the repeal of Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell and they got Holder and the Justice Department doing nothing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. They also got the usual sympathetic gay appointments and gay friendly this and that. The trinkets of power.</p>
<p>Then came the marriage referendum in North Carolina, and the mafia et al. were pumping a lot of money in there, but they probably knew two-three weeks out that they were going to get clobbered. They were angry, as they always are, but they turned the anger on Obama. They wanted something that would blunt the big loss in North Carolina. They were probably also starting to worry that the whisper to &#8220;wait until he is re-elected&#8221; meant that all the money would be for nothing because his numbers suggested that he could very well lose. They demanded action.</p>
<p>Obama sent out Arne Duncan and Joe Biden to test the waters and things looked pretty clear, so after the North Carolina measure passed, Obama came out and blunted the effect by saying he supported &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; and that made everything wonderful again.</p>
<p>But I think it was the one real true mistake he has made (not counting the health care thing which he knew would hurt him but was too important to gaining more power over Americans to let it fail). It crossed through the national political discourse at the wrong time, in the wrong way, and he looked bad. It was transparently cheesy and this time there was no &#8220;watch my hands&#8221; effect where people simply yawned and took the post-hypnotic suggestion.</p>
<p>The way November stands now is that uncommitted or voters who are only leaning one way or the other are now looking for reasons not to vote for Obama and reasons to vote for Romney. This is already and old election, five and a half months before it happens. We could know by Labor Day who is going to win. People are sick of politics. They&#8217;re getting sick of Obama. I know the *one* way that the Democrats, who I have taken to calling the human sacrifice and sodomy cult, could make a big comeback between Labor Day and the election, but I&#8217;m not talking. (Remind me to tell you what it is after the election.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by tkc</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134538</link>
		<dc:creator>tkc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134538</guid>
		<description>The media did do something about it.  The Washington Post ran a hit piece on Romney that maybe he bullied a kid maybe because he was gay and that one of the guys regrets that he took part in it all this time or at least until the Post reminded him of it a few weeks ago.
Case closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media did do something about it.  The Washington Post ran a hit piece on Romney that maybe he bullied a kid maybe because he was gay and that one of the guys regrets that he took part in it all this time or at least until the Post reminded him of it a few weeks ago.<br />
Case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134536</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134536</guid>
		<description>How do I know? Because he doesn&#039;t do anything without a political motive ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I know? Because he doesn&#8217;t do anything without a political motive ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by Neo</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134534</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134534</guid>
		<description>How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only?
 
Because nothing has changed, except the &lt;strong&gt;&quot;wink, wink, nudge, nudge, know what I mean .. say no more&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; is gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only?<br />
<br />
Because nothing has changed, except the <strong>&#8220;wink, wink, nudge, nudge, know what I mean .. say no more&#8221;</strong> is gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by looker</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134533</link>
		<dc:creator>looker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134533</guid>
		<description>Course it&#039;s political, and not just political, intended to work with other things they had in the pipeline.  Joe got ahead of himself on what probably HAD been discussed, and being fresh on what limited mind he has, he blurted it out well ahead of schedule leaving Obama and their planned attacks on Romney in a pickle.
 
Look at the timing - The Post&#039;s Gay Bullying story, right AFTER the declaration?  Really?  I mean, obviously they were putting that story together for a while, you don&#039;t just dig that up and roll with it in 2 days, the guy who the story claimed spent his life regretting the anti-gay hair cutting, who then claimed he&#039;d never even heard of it until a couple weeks/months (we&#039;ll use Holder time here....) FROM the Post reporter indicates THAT was in the works.  So, this was intended to go off later, and the White House village idiot let it loose too soon.   And Obama, figuring he could get away with it, as he ALWAYS has before, ran with it.
 
Tell me it didn&#039;t work to shake the money loose.  But it&#039;s NOT so good in other areas, and I&#039;m betting they counted on the bullying gays narrative to have gotten enough traction by the planned time to discourage people to boldly come out against what Obama said.
 
Now, I think they miscalculated on THAT all along, but I do think they figured it would be something people would hesitate to do since it makes you, sort of, a &#039;racist&#039; if you don&#039;t believe in same sex marriage, AND you say so.
 
He had to go with this, and he wasn&#039;t ready for any executive mandates to go into place, but he HAD to respond because the same sex base was suddenly in a furor thanks to Joe.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Course it&#8217;s political, and not just political, intended to work with other things they had in the pipeline.  Joe got ahead of himself on what probably HAD been discussed, and being fresh on what limited mind he has, he blurted it out well ahead of schedule leaving Obama and their planned attacks on Romney in a pickle.<br />
<br />
Look at the timing &#8211; The Post&#8217;s Gay Bullying story, right AFTER the declaration?  Really?  I mean, obviously they were putting that story together for a while, you don&#8217;t just dig that up and roll with it in 2 days, the guy who the story claimed spent his life regretting the anti-gay hair cutting, who then claimed he&#8217;d never even heard of it until a couple weeks/months (we&#8217;ll use Holder time here&#8230;.) FROM the Post reporter indicates THAT was in the works.  So, this was intended to go off later, and the White House village idiot let it loose too soon.   And Obama, figuring he could get away with it, as he ALWAYS has before, ran with it.<br />
<br />
Tell me it didn&#8217;t work to shake the money loose.  But it&#8217;s NOT so good in other areas, and I&#8217;m betting they counted on the bullying gays narrative to have gotten enough traction by the planned time to discourage people to boldly come out against what Obama said.<br />
<br />
Now, I think they miscalculated on THAT all along, but I do think they figured it would be something people would hesitate to do since it makes you, sort of, a &#8216;racist&#8217; if you don&#8217;t believe in same sex marriage, AND you say so.<br />
<br />
He had to go with this, and he wasn&#8217;t ready for any executive mandates to go into place, but he HAD to respond because the same sex base was suddenly in a furor thanks to Joe.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by alanstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134531</link>
		<dc:creator>alanstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134531</guid>
		<description>How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only?
 
That&#039;s easy. Obama said it.  Thus, it was said for political advantage.
 
Any more questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know Obama’s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only?<br />
<br />
That&#8217;s easy. Obama said it.  Thus, it was said for political advantage.<br />
<br />
Any more questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Bruce McQuain</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134528</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McQuain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134528</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t care.  On my radar screen now.  Not good ... unacceptable.  To broad in its implementation, breaches private contracts and can and will put innocent people in jeopardy.  No go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t care.  On my radar screen now.  Not good &#8230; unacceptable.  To broad in its implementation, breaches private contracts and can and will put innocent people in jeopardy.  No go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do you know Obama&#8217;s gay marriage declaration was for political purposes only? by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13031&#038;cpage=1#comment-134527</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13031#comment-134527</guid>
		<description>Classic Alinsky.  Cover all sides of an issue by declaration...contradiction is GOOD.  It FOSTERS confusion, and allows Pres. Dog Breath to pwn the donors who heard their particular pitch on the dog whistle.
(See how I worked &quot;dog&quot; into that...?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic Alinsky.  Cover all sides of an issue by declaration&#8230;contradiction is GOOD.  It FOSTERS confusion, and allows Pres. Dog Breath to pwn the donors who heard their particular pitch on the dog whistle.<br />
(See how I worked &#8220;dog&#8221; into that&#8230;?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My goodness &#8230;. this is just pitiful by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13024&#038;cpage=1#comment-134525</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13024#comment-134525</guid>
		<description>May it be so.  I look for him to set up at the UN.  MULTIPLES worse than a super-Sharpton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May it be so.  I look for him to set up at the UN.  MULTIPLES worse than a super-Sharpton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Harun</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134524</link>
		<dc:creator>Harun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134524</guid>
		<description>And Gov. Moonbeam has done some decent stuff, but its all nibbling around the edge and hoping for growth to come back. These statists are like the people in Idiocracy watering the fields with Brawndo - &quot;Taxes and Regulations - its what growth craves&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Gov. Moonbeam has done some decent stuff, but its all nibbling around the edge and hoping for growth to come back. These statists are like the people in Idiocracy watering the fields with Brawndo &#8211; &#8220;Taxes and Regulations &#8211; its what growth craves&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Harun</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134523</link>
		<dc:creator>Harun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134523</guid>
		<description>You will see elections in Europe swing back and forth with no real solutions until the collapse. That&#039;s because politicians still claim there are easy ways out.
I recently had some back and forth with people on a Gov. Brown google plus post. They are not living in reality at all. They think California is doing great! Obviously they are state workers - no one else would believe that.
Its also amazing how fast these supposedly sympathetic liberals are to throw &quot;red parts&quot; of the state under the bus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will see elections in Europe swing back and forth with no real solutions until the collapse. That&#8217;s because politicians still claim there are easy ways out.<br />
I recently had some back and forth with people on a Gov. Brown google plus post. They are not living in reality at all. They think California is doing great! Obviously they are state workers &#8211; no one else would believe that.<br />
Its also amazing how fast these supposedly sympathetic liberals are to throw &#8220;red parts&#8221; of the state under the bus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134521</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134521</guid>
		<description>They could do it with Ma Bell and your land lines, too.  LONG ago.
This isn&#039;t a new thing under the sun.  Not at all.  And my right to chat AT ALL MOMENTS IN TIME with Gladys about her fruit salad really would not stand against stopping a Mumbai event in the pantheon of rights.
I figure most rational people agree.  As we would agree that this is an emergency power...like forcing you off the streets...that CANNOT be allowed to propagate OUTSIDE an emergency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could do it with Ma Bell and your land lines, too.  LONG ago.<br />
This isn&#8217;t a new thing under the sun.  Not at all.  And my right to chat AT ALL MOMENTS IN TIME with Gladys about her fruit salad really would not stand against stopping a Mumbai event in the pantheon of rights.<br />
I figure most rational people agree.  As we would agree that this is an emergency power&#8230;like forcing you off the streets&#8230;that CANNOT be allowed to propagate OUTSIDE an emergency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My goodness &#8230;. this is just pitiful by Transterrestrial Musings - Obama&#8217;s Glory Was Inevitable</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13024&#038;cpage=1#comment-134519</link>
		<dc:creator>Transterrestrial Musings - Obama&#8217;s Glory Was Inevitable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13024#comment-134519</guid>
		<description>[...] really is a personality disorder: Examination of the symptoms should give pause. I’m not saying he might be the only politician [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really is a personality disorder: Examination of the symptoms should give pause. I’m not saying he might be the only politician [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Bruce McQuain</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134518</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McQuain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134518</guid>
		<description>New enough I don&#039;t like it or support it.  Different enough that &quot;cops keeping me off the streets&quot; doesn&#039;t even begin to compare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New enough I don&#8217;t like it or support it.  Different enough that &#8220;cops keeping me off the streets&#8221; doesn&#8217;t even begin to compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cell phone jamming: violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic? by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13027&#038;cpage=1#comment-134517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13027#comment-134517</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yes.  As usual.  And as ALWAYS.
 
You&#039;re a little Chicken Little here, McQ.  The cops can keep you off the streets, too.  They can do lots of things in an extremity they do not think of doing otherwise.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
“It’s the nature of law enforcement to push the envelope,” said Eugene O’Donnell
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wul, yah...  And it&#039;s the nature of civil libertarians to push back.  Always has been since the Founding.  Really NOTHING new here, McQ
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
violation of civil rights or good law enforcement tactic?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.  As usual.  And as ALWAYS.<br />
<br />
You&#8217;re a little Chicken Little here, McQ.  The cops can keep you off the streets, too.  They can do lots of things in an extremity they do not think of doing otherwise.</p>
<blockquote><p>
“It’s the nature of law enforcement to push the envelope,” said Eugene O’Donnell
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wul, yah&#8230;  And it&#8217;s the nature of civil libertarians to push back.  Always has been since the Founding.  Really NOTHING new here, McQ<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by looker</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134515</link>
		<dc:creator>looker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134515</guid>
		<description>So long as you can implement your life style via taking, all good right?  Except now they have to take more and, well, funny thing about that, they&#039;ve encountered Thatcher&#039;s theorem on socialism.
 
It isn&#039;t totally that some people believe they can continue this life style, the problem is the people in CHARGE believe it, and encourage the common idiots in their beliefs.   Governor MoonBeam is demonstrating that even as we type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long as you can implement your life style via taking, all good right?  Except now they have to take more and, well, funny thing about that, they&#8217;ve encountered Thatcher&#8217;s theorem on socialism.<br />
<br />
It isn&#8217;t totally that some people believe they can continue this life style, the problem is the people in CHARGE believe it, and encourage the common idiots in their beliefs.   Governor MoonBeam is demonstrating that even as we type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Quote of the Day &#124; The Thinker</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134513</link>
		<dc:creator>Quote of the Day &#124; The Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134513</guid>
		<description>[...] Dale Franks (on QandO), on the subject of looting the economy: The problem with reality is that it doesn’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dale Franks (on QandO), on the subject of looting the economy: The problem with reality is that it doesn’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134511</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134511</guid>
		<description>Up to a point, I think we always know what we are doing/using that is self-destructive.  Do we really &quot;want&quot; it?  Surely, part of us does, but up to that point I mentioned, part of us doesn&#039;t.
 
But then we can cross that point where all doubt...and most chance of redemption...is gone.
 
There are Collectivists who read this blog who we&#039;ve seen are pretty far across that Rubicon.  Others, perhaps not...yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up to a point, I think we always know what we are doing/using that is self-destructive.  Do we really &#8220;want&#8221; it?  Surely, part of us does, but up to that point I mentioned, part of us doesn&#8217;t.<br />
<br />
But then we can cross that point where all doubt&#8230;and most chance of redemption&#8230;is gone.<br />
<br />
There are Collectivists who read this blog who we&#8217;ve seen are pretty far across that Rubicon.  Others, perhaps not&#8230;yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My goodness &#8230;. this is just pitiful by Billy Hollis</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13024&#038;cpage=1#comment-134507</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13024#comment-134507</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve said before, I believe he will be the next generation&#039;s Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton rolled together. He&#039;ll be a race-baiting poverty pimp like them. He&#039;ll combine that with the sanctimonious unction and obligatory press coverage of Jimmy Carter. And we&#039;ll have to put up with that noxious combination for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I believe he will be the next generation&#8217;s Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton rolled together. He&#8217;ll be a race-baiting poverty pimp like them. He&#8217;ll combine that with the sanctimonious unction and obligatory press coverage of Jimmy Carter. And we&#8217;ll have to put up with that noxious combination for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Billy Hollis</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134506</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134506</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
You don’t really want those, anyhow.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Oh, yes, they do. They need them desperately, and cannot imagine what life would be without them. Those delusions define who they are as people: brilliant, caring, virtuous - both able and willing to boss the rest of us around because of their goodness and smarts.
They may not *need* them, and the rest of us certainly wish they could get out from under that warm blanket of delusion they occupy. But they *want* those delusions because without them, they would actually have to look in the mirror and face the reality of who they are as a person. That might mean, for example, facing the reality that someone who is convinced of his brilliance and superiority would have to admit that he&#039;s wrong about everything and is nothing more than a mediocre professor in a mediocre rural college. As I said a few weeks ago, &lt;a href=&quot;?p=12906&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they don&#039;t have the psychic strength&lt;/a&gt; to face it. 

I echoed Dale in that entry, though: &quot;OK, let them live in their fantasy world. In the end, reality always wins.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
You don’t really want those, anyhow.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, yes, they do. They need them desperately, and cannot imagine what life would be without them. Those delusions define who they are as people: brilliant, caring, virtuous &#8211; both able and willing to boss the rest of us around because of their goodness and smarts.<br />
They may not *need* them, and the rest of us certainly wish they could get out from under that warm blanket of delusion they occupy. But they *want* those delusions because without them, they would actually have to look in the mirror and face the reality of who they are as a person. That might mean, for example, facing the reality that someone who is convinced of his brilliance and superiority would have to admit that he&#8217;s wrong about everything and is nothing more than a mediocre professor in a mediocre rural college. As I said a few weeks ago, <a href="?p=12906" rel="nofollow">they don&#8217;t have the psychic strength</a> to face it. </p>
<p>I echoed Dale in that entry, though: &#8220;OK, let them live in their fantasy world. In the end, reality always wins.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Ragspierre</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134505</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragspierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134505</guid>
		<description>Realityville is a good place to live.  I recommend it to all the Collective.  C&#039;mon over...there&#039;s plenty of room, and all it will cost is your delusions.  You don&#039;t really want those, anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Realityville is a good place to live.  I recommend it to all the Collective.  C&#8217;mon over&#8230;there&#8217;s plenty of room, and all it will cost is your delusions.  You don&#8217;t really want those, anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Things that should be obvious by Things that should be obvious &#124; Liberal Whoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.qando.net/?p=13026&#038;cpage=1#comment-134500</link>
		<dc:creator>Things that should be obvious &#124; Liberal Whoppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qando.net/?p=13026#comment-134500</guid>
		<description>[...] original post here: Things that should be obvious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] original post here: Things that should be obvious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

