Free Markets, Free People

Daily Archives: May 24, 2011


Israel’s bottom line

If President Obama is actually serious about an Israeli/Palestinian accord, he better review the speech Benjamin Netanyahu gave before a joint session of Congress today.

He said that to reach a deal, Palestinians must agree to live with a Jewish state that would include areas in the suburbs of Jerusalem and around Tel Aviv.

Jerusalem, he said, “will never be divided,” and Israel’s army would remain along the Jordan River.

While some land where Israelis have settled would lie outside its final borders, he said, the borders would not be identical to those of 1967 and before, which he once again called indefensible. Palestinian refugees and their descendants, he said, would have to find their homes outside these borders, limiting their right of return to old homelands — long a sticking point.

That’s the Israeli bottom line and it isn’t going to change much even if Netanyahu is no longer the Prime Minister.  This is it – this is what that state, after years of fighting for its life, has determined is the minimum conditions it must insist on for its self-defense.  Essentially, these particular positions aren’t negotiable.

Obama claims his policy and position isn’t new.  Obviously the Israelis disagree.  There, laid out for everyone to see is Israel’s position.  In the meantime, I’d also add, were I Netanyahu, that until Hamas and the Palestinians recognize Israel’s right to exist and renounce violence against Israel, that Israel has no interest in any process.  That’s such a basic requirement I’m surprised it has to repeated endlessly.

Netanyahu says he is willing to make painful concessions on behalf of Israel – including some settlements in occupied lands.  But he’s not willing to concede any of the above – and it it time for this administration to get a clue if it is serious about the peace process.  I simply don’t think it is, and the new conditions laid out by Obama are a way of putting the onus and blame on Israel for being “intransigent” in the face of decades of Palestinian intransigence.  This is Obama’s way of saying “not my fault that the peace process I so highly touted fell apart”.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO


More of the ObamaCare false flag operation

Rick Ungar is the latest flag bearer:

Recent data provided by the nation’s largest health insurance companies reveals that a provision of the Affordable Care Act – or Obamacare – is bringing big numbers of the uninsured into the health care insurance system.

And they are precisely the uninsured that we want– the young people who tend not to get sick.

The provision of the law that permits young adults under 26, long the largest uninsured demographic in the country, to remain on their parents’ health insurance program resulted in at least 600,000 newly insured Americans during the first quarter of 2011.

Of course, most will  be gone at 27 for any number of reasons – unless they’re forced by law to buy it on their own.

But again, the problem going in isn’t necessarily “uninsured” as the left continues to insist.   Surprise, the ERs didn’t magically empty as promised under RomneyCare in MA as promised, but became even more crowded – with insured.

Why?  Because there’s a shortage of Doctors and health care providers willing to take on new patients, especially those on Medicaid.  In fact, there’s a shortage of doctors, period.

But the fantasy lives:

For starters, every one of the young immortals we add to the rolls of the insured is one less young adult who will turn to the emergency room to fix a broken leg and then find themselves unable to pay the bill – leaving it to the rest of us to pay the tab.

See, false flag.  It isn’t about being “stuck with the bill” – the mythical “free rider” problem.  It is about being seen and receiving care in other than an ER, and that’s just not going to happen under this law unless doctors are forced to do so.  Our problem isn’t that we’re going broke because of ER costs.  Our problem is that government insurance has made those who hold it so unattractive to doctors that most don’t want too many of them in their patient mix.

Doctors most likely take this “young blood” as Ungar calls them as they’ll rarely if ever see them, and besides they’ve most likely been seeing them under their parents insurance for years. 

And I’m sure the insurance companies are very happy with the result of the new law which extends coverage to family members up to age 26.  More profit, little payout.  Those that are under the age of 26 probably are fine with it too since they’re most likely not paying the bill.

We can insure everyone in America, and I’m sure that’s the eventual goal.  But unless we increase the size of the health care force exponentially, it won’t mean a thing.  It isn’t an insurance problem, folks, it’s the usual problem of supply and demand.   And government intrusion in the market has made the market less attractive to those who would be the suppliers – as usual.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO


Wee’eer baaaack! (update)

I have no idea what happened but we were lights out since last night.  I think it may have been a problem with our service provider because all the Monday posts have disappeared.  That says to me that they may have had to recover from a known point – like Sunday night.

I’ll pop the Monday posts back up here (life in the semi-fast lane I guess) and QandO is back on the air.  Thank you for your patience.

UPDATE: OK so I won’t be posting Monday’s blog posts.  Apparently I forgot to save local drafts soooo .. welcome to Tuesday which feels like a Monday.

~McQ