If radical Islamic bombers ever become competent, the West could have a problem
Some wackado Islamic radical blew himself up in Stockholm Sweden. He was the only fatality although he injured two others and now has a nation in the grip of fear.
Of course my title is simply a statement of how inept this particular bomber was in this particular case. And yes, it is a bit sarcastic as well. But as we saw with the NYC bomber, it is indeed amateur hour among the radical recruits. And that doesn’t count the Portland wannabe bomber and the other joker who was the victim of a sting as he tried to blow up a recruiting station.
For the most part, they’re young, they’re radical and – unfortunately – they already live in the country they target. In fact, in some cases, they’re citizens of the country they target, although mostly naturalized citizens.
Of course the object of any such bombing is terror. And the desired tactical outcome is mass casualties. The desired strategic outcome, however, is fear and over-reaction. A bit of making those attacked dance to the attacker’s tune. It’s about getting into the minds of those they wish to terrorize and make them more amenable to meeting the demands of the terrorists.
In the case of Sweden, it turns out the reason for this attack was Sweden’s claimed “silence” about the cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad years ago. Additionally, there was criticism of Swedish participation in NATO’s Afghan mission (500 Swedish troops in the northern part of the country).
So while the tactical outcome wasn’t accomplished, it appears that the strategic aim may end up being achieved.
The Stockholm blasts seemed certain to cause widespread shock in Sweden. The country has long prided itself on having created a stable and peaceful society at home, and on having avoided involvement in the upheavals that have ravaged much of the rest of Europe in modern times, including World War II.
It’ll be interesting how Sweden reacts to this in the coming weeks. But perhaps every time they think about capitulating to the strategic aim of the terrorists they should review and think about the message they received from compatriots of the bomber:
“Now, your children — daughters and sisters — will die like our brothers and sisters and children die,” it continued. “Our actions will speak for themselves. As long as you do not end your war against Islam and the insult against the prophet and your stupid support for that pig Vilks.”
You can’t vote “present” in this sort of a situation. As is obvious, people are out to kill Swedes and they don’t much care who it is that’s unlucky enough to be around the next bombing attempt (of course, the probability of being killed in a terror attack in the West is probably akin to the probability of being struck by lightning as it is – but it still scares people excessively.).
So … they can roll over, give up their liberty and freedom and someday see their children grow up in an oppressive culture that doesn’t value anything the Swedes value today. Or Sweden can take a deep breath, hitch up its courage, declare real war on radical Islam and the killers it creates and sweep them from their country. By doing so they can also serve notice that the dominant culture – Swedish culture – will remain as such and that those who’ve immigrated from other lands and other cultures can adapt to that culture or leave. Here’s a basic truth that needs to be heeded: You cannot be tolerant with the intolerant.
When those who would kill you declare war on you as these killers have, you have two choices – fight the war or surrender. You can’t decide not to participate. It doesn’t work that way. Hopefully Sweden will understand that and choose the former over the latter.
~McQ













I suppose that any individual who embraces suicide bombing as a primary action, might arguably be less than mentally competent anyway, and on that basis, you’re by definition scraping the barrel bottom.
As for Sweden and their reaction, one can only hope the old adage about a conservative being a liberal who has been mugged, is true… both for their sake and ours.
Stockholm Syndrome is a high possibility.
I couldn’t resist the pun, but I’m serious. The ‘capitulaters’ will see this as a result of insufficient capitulation and dig their heels in deeper in their attitudes.
Pingback: Tweets that mention If radical Islamic bombers ever become competent, the West could have a problem -- Topsy.com
It’s really hard to gain any competency when your busy trying to be a suicide bomber.
It’s sort of a one-off kind of profession … making it hard to get any aid from somebody with experience.
Don’t think this VW ad helps
I’m far from an expert on Sweden, but I think it’s reasonably likely that the islamonuts have picked on the wrong people. Yes, the Swedes are big on the whole neutrality thing, but its a pretty fiercely defended neutrality. I don’t think that they have fully embraced the multiculturalist “our society and history are so deplorable that we must embrace everybody else’s as completely equal if not outright better” ideal that inflicts many Western lefties. I suggest, rather, that they are more like the French: they will not respond well to this direct attack.
We shall see.
From admittedly limited and anecdotal experience, I wouldn’t get my hopes up. So far the Swedes I know, read, or have come across via other sites are so set on ignoring the possibility of a threat from militant Islamists that most are trying to deny that this suicide bombing had any political or religious motivation at all. “It was probably just some guy depressed during the holidays who lost his job or something, a freak isolated incident, seized upon by our right wing elements for fear-mongering and the smearing of an entirely and utterly innocent religious minority” and so on and so forth.
Pingback: Swedish PM: Don’t bother me with facts when I’m being tolerant « Public Secrets
Pingback: Swedish PM: Don’t bother me with facts when I’m being tolerant « Sister Toldjah
Pingback: Terrorism joins democracy as one of Britain’s major exports | Full Comment | National Post
Pingback: Swedish PM: Don’t bother me with facts when I’m being tolerant | Conservatives for America
I wouldn’t put too much stock in ‘values’ the Swedes don’t want to give up. Personal freedom isn’t one. Families and marriage – not. Perhaps they don’t have anything to really ‘fight’ for?