Free Markets, Free People


Eric Holder acknowledges homegrown threat but can’t bring himself to name it

Seriously, this sort of nonsense has to stop:

"What I am trying to do in this interview is to make people aware of the fact that the threat is real, the threat is different, the threat is constant," he said.

And the threat is from?

What was uppermost on his mind, however, is the alarming rise in the number of Americans who are more than willing to attack and kill their fellow citizens.

Yes?  And who are these Americans? What do they have in common?

"It is one of the things that keeps me up at night," Holder said. "You didn’t worry about this even two years ago — about individuals, about Americans, to the extent that we now do. And — that is of — of great concern."

"The threat has changed from simply worrying about foreigners coming here, to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens — raised here, born here, and who for whatever reason, have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take up arms against the nation in which they were born," he said.

Hello – what else have they in common?  What has “radicalized” them?

In the last 24 months, Holder said, 126 people have been indicted on terrorist-related charges, Fifty of those people are American citizens.

"I think that what is most alarming to me is the totality of what we see, the attorney general said. "Whether it is an attempt to bomb the New York City subway system, an attempt to bring down an airplane over Detroit, an attempt to set off a bomb in Times Square … I think that gives us a sense of the breadth of the challenges that we face, and the kinds of things that our enemy is trying to do."

Holder says many of these converts to al Qaeda have something in common: a link to radical cleric Anwar Al Awlaki, an American citizen himself.

And Al Awlaki and al Qaeda are both driven by what?  Al Awlaki is what sort of cleric?

"He’s an extremely dangerous man. He has shown a desire to harm the United States, a desire to strike the homeland of the United States," Holder said. "He is a person who — as an American citizen — is familiar with this country and he brings a dimension, because of that American familiarity, that others do not."

Holder said that as a threat to the United States, Awlaki ranks right up there with Osama bin Laden.

"He would be on the same list with bin Laden," the attorney general said. "He’s up there. I don’t know whether he’s one, two, three, four — I don’t know. But he’s certainly on the list of the people who worry me the most."

Yes, yes and what is the common thread between Awlaki, bin Laden, al Qaeda and the people who keep Holder up at night?

"I have to have all those tools available to me to try to keep the American people safe, and to do the job that I’m supposed to do as a 21st century attorney general," Holder said.

Holder said the United States has made great strides in improving its ability to detect and block attacks, which is shown by the number of would-be terrorists who have been stopped before they could kill Americans. The intelligence community is working around the clock, he said, with little time off.

Well acknowledging that every single one of the “terrorists” or “radicals” among the 50 or so apprehended this year was Muslim or a convert to Islam might go a long way in identifying the threat.  Osama bin Laden, Al Awlaki and the 50 Americans all have in common their brand of radical Islam.  Al Qaeda didn’t just pop up because it thought it would be fun to target and kill Americans, it exists because its followers believe in a radical brand of Islam that instructs them to make war against infidels.  And America is considered the infidel of infidel nations.  Ergo, it is their primary target.

Without the underlying thread of their radical beliefs, they have no real reason to attack us.  But, acknowledging that all 50 of the “Americans” were Muslim and the fact that all 126 arrested shared that same radical faith would mean acknowledging that Muslims are 100% of the problem.  Can’t do that and search granny at the airport (in the name of fairness)can we?  Can’t do that and risk the charge of “profiling” – something we absolutely ought to be doing until circumstance or evidence lead us to do otherwise.

Why is it we’ll subject our own citizens to degrading, humiliating and intrusive searches of their person at airports and yet we won’t do the logical thing necessary to actually protect our citizenry?  Profiling is done everyday in law enforcement – just ask about how serial killers are identified.  When a description of a perpetrator is circulated, it will have the perp’s gender, race and age.  That is profiling data which helps narrow the search.

To this point we haven’t had a non-Muslim attacker try to blow any of us up.  Why are we so shy about saying that “radical Islam” is the problem, and until they prove otherwise, the larger set of Muslims in the US are a potential threat?   How do you argue otherwise given the evidence?

Does that mean we should go on a witch hunt within the American Muslim community?  Of course not – but, we shouldn’t avoid the fact that the threat has consistently and exclusively come from that community and that until it stops, they’ll be views suspiciously, watched closely and receive the most scrutiny.

But we won’t.  Just as Eric Holder spent an entire interview avoiding the use of the words “Muslim” or “Islam”, we’ll continue to eschew the obvious and doing what is logical for the appearance of being “fair”.  Apparently fairness, not security, is our nation’s highest priority – at least for now.

~McQ

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks

25 Responses to Eric Holder acknowledges homegrown threat but can’t bring himself to name it

  • This reminds me of my time at college. Whenever there was a crime committed on campus and the police were looking for a suspect, they would always list identifying factors like clothing, but they would never list the race of the suspect.

  • Gee, why am I constantly reminded of the scenes in Harry Potter where people are terrified to say “Voldemort”.    It seems Islam is the new “he who must not be named”.
    It is sometimes almost humorous to watch public officials twist themselves into pretzels trying to avoid equating Islam of muslims with terrorism or threats to the USA.  Too bad it is way to serious to be a laughing matter.
    When we begin to actively and publicly profile muslims at airports I will begin to believe we are taking things more seriously.
     

  • “Islamist” works every time you use it.  It is a nice, delineated term that reflects the distinction between radical outlaws and the rest of the Muslim world.  Why is that so hard to adopt?

    • We constantly get this ditribe from this administration that we shouldn’t upset the Muslims (we had the Fed telling a bank to take down Christian stuff last week).
      I suggest a different approach.  Bitchslap them till they snap. 

      If it becomes intolerable, they will move to Afghanistan or something.
      The notion that becoming good dhimmis will make us safe is just plain stupid.

      • Well, hell…  SURE you can offend Christians.  OF COURSE you can offend Joooos.  Hindus are fair game.  Buddhists?  Who’s worried about Buddhists?
        No, we only have to be sensitive to IslamISTS.  ‘Cuz, you know…being reasonable and sensitive WILL pay dividends with those guys…

  • This must have something to do with the separation of church and state. No mention of either Christianity or Islamism. They are, of course, equivalent, both being religions. 

    • Oh bull. The Christians might create a theocracy. They hate gays and women’s rights.

      The Muslims are just another underprivleged diversity group.

      • Right, and Iranian Muslims, for example,  don’t hate gays, they hang them.
        Hanging, not Hate.

  • The problem MUST come from those radical Christianists!  And Palin…..she’s mixed up in this somehow I’d bet

  • He is a person who — as an American citizen — is familiar with this country and he brings a dimension, because of that American familiarity, that others do not.

    Color me paranoid, but my immediate thought when I read this was that Holder is laying the groundwork for tossing US citizens into places like Gitmo.

    Holder said the United States has made great strides in improving its ability to detect and block attacks, which is shown by the number of would-be terrorists who have been stopped before they could kill Americans. The intelligence community is working around the clock, he said, with little time off.

    Would that be “would-be terrorists” like those who can’t build a bomb that works?  So far as I can tell, we haven’t really “stopped” any terrorists: they’ve simply been too incompetent to hurt anybody.

    And what’s with the bit about “working around the clock… with little time off?”  Are the intelligence agencies and FBI shutting down for a day or two every month?  Or are we supposed to be impressed by the fact that, like police departments across the country, the feds work 24/7?

    • Maybe we’re back to laying the ground work for assassination squads punching their ticket on the first train to Paradise.  Damn that George W. Bush for making them violate the Constitutional rights of American citizens.

    • You know this whole thing about not recognizing the “Islamists” might just be one big “head-fake”

  • What do they have in common?  What has “radicalized” them?

    If you check the “progressive” web sites, the obvious answer would be Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.

    • To this point we haven’t had a non-Muslim attacker try to blow any of us up.

      We had that loon at the Dicovery Channel and that guy who kamikazed the IRS in Texas, but both of these guys were just plain crazy.   The IRS guy was probably going broken, but if that’s the criteria for monitoring Americans, we are about to become a “police state.”

      • If you cast a wider net you get the OK city bombing, and even the biggest school killing ever, a car bomb back in the 30′s IIRC. And you can find others.

        Of course there was some indication of an Islamic connection in the OK city thing. I’m not sure what the full story on that aspect is (is there real evidence others were involved)?

        Then there was the Weather Underground (etc).

        The pattern in the 70s was leftist radicals. The pattern now is Islamic radicals. When these groups were not active, it was mostly lone nutters. The lone nutters are the background noise of terrorism.

        • Note I’m talking about the US. If you cast your net wider geographically you get a long term Islamic threat as well as a bunch of other groups. The basic pattern remains mostly Muslim or leftist, however.

          • Well, that finally explains the connection between Leftists (i.e. FARC, Weather Underground, et al ) and the fundalmentalists Islamists (I mean aren’t these guys supposed to be hard line Righties ?).

          • Oh.  I forgot.   The Islamists aren’t on the spectrum of Right-Left. 
            You see they don’t discriminate … they hate everybody.

        • “Then there was the Weather Underground (etc).”

          Don’t be silly Don, if you’re a member of the Weather Underground, you become a respected educational professional, friend of the President of the United States, and possibly ghost writer of his autobiography.

  • Incompetent…
    Pitiful…
    Malfeasant…
    Unqualified…
    Clueless…

    Words Simply Fail.

  • When it comes to security techniques, especially for companies, I need to agree with what you’ve said entirely. You’ll find so numerous options in the marketplace, it’s important for a expert to be aware what is very bestfor their situation and additionally particular construction. The information you’re presenting can be a great support to businesses along with security professionals similarly. Thank you once more!

  • A little bit pregnant? A moderate Muslim? I don’t think so.

michael kors outlet michael kors handbags outlet michael kors factory outlet