Free Markets, Free People


Don’t ever call Buzz Aldrin a “liar and a coward”

Buzz Aldrin is 72 years old.  He’s also a national hero.

Watch this this  moon landing denying D-bag harass Aldrin (and tell me that jerk doesn’t remind you of a cleaned up Michael Moore).  Watch him get in Aldrin’s face and call him a “liar” and a “coward”.

Finally, watch the result:

 

Consider it your "feel good" vid of the day.

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks

16 Responses to Don’t ever call Buzz Aldrin a “liar and a coward”

  • Pretty good right hand, too!!!

  • Nice form, Buzz.

  • Another example of why they are “The Greatest Generation”.

    • Oh please, it has nothing to do with his generation, there were nuts like that SOB in Aldrin’s time and there are good, upstanding men like Aldrin around now as well. @Constitution First

  • Nice right. What the hell is that rotten slob pestering him all about? Is he a lone nut or some sort of Larouche bot?

    • @martinmcphillips Reckon he’s one of those guys who maintian the moon landing was done on a sound-stage in Pasadena.

      One notch from the Truthers. A curious form of “lunacy”…heh…

  • We once had Scott Carpenter call the house while we were out.
    We save the message on the answering machine for about 18 months, when a power outage lost it.

  • Buzz is 82. Those decades fly by, don’t they.

  • When I first saw this video years ago, I visted Sibrel’s website to leave a message via his “contact” form. I asked Sibrel if Aldrin’s fist ever recovered from that severe beating administered to it by Sibrel’s face.

    —Tom Nally, New Orleans

  • How did this whole wacky “faked landing” thing take hold? An Andy Koffman publicity stunt? Critical and informed observation disputes any deception. Watch the behavior of the way the talcum-like dust as it settles in a vacuum as the astronauts and the rover move around, you can only come to the conclusion that there was no way back then to fake that dust behavior without CGI, a filming technique still decades away, same with the movement of the fabric of the flag. Those events in my youth had a direct affect, leading me to my current career in aerospace R&D. From my vantage point, I’ve seen what goes into making space flight a reality, it is real, difficult, dangerous and extraordinarily expensive. That said, most of what we call high-tech (i.e. microchips, fuel cells and exotic materials) is a direct result of aerospace R&D. We got back far more than we invested as a nation, which is why I can’t understand why we aren’t preparing a Mars landing. The technology development required to get us there and back, would put America back in the industrial drivers seat, just like it did in the early 1960′s.

  • How did this whole wacky “faked landing” thing take hold? An Andy Koffman publicity stunt? Critical and informed observation disputes any deception. Watch the behavior of the way the talcum-like dust as it settles in a vacuum as the astronauts and the rover move around, you can only come to the conclusion that there was no way back then to fake that dust behavior without CGI, a filming technique still decades away, same with the movement of the fabric of the flag. Those events in my youth had a direct affect, leading me to my current career in aerospace R&D. From my vantage point, I’ve seen what goes into making space flight a reality, it is real, difficult, dangerous and extraordinarily expensive. That said, most of what we call high-tech (i.e. microchips, fuel cells and exotic materials) is a direct result of aerospace R&D. We got back far more than we invested as a nation, which is why I can’t understand why we aren’t preparing a Mars landing. The technology development required to get us there and back, would put America back in the industrial drivers seat, just like it did in the early 1960′s.

michael kors outlet michael kors handbags outlet michael kors factory outlet