Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Ammo

Divider

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks
Click HERE for Kindle version

Divider

Posts By Date
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Old QandO
Facebook

Politics Top Blogs

Free Markets, Free People

 


Egypt, “Arab Spring” and International Women’s Day

 

Gotta love it (he said sarcastically):

The Freedom and Justice Party, political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, says it does not endorse gender discrimination, although the Brotherhood argues women should not be allowed to rule the country.

The party is the dominant bloc in both houses of parliament after a sweeping victory in a multi-phase general election that began in November. Women hold just two percent of the seats in parliament.

Because, you know, not allowing women to rule the country isn’t “gender discrimination” as the Muslim Brotherhood sees it (they too are adept at redefining words apparently).

A women’s conference organized by the dominant Islamist bloc in the Egyptian parliament has called for a council for families to replace the existing National Council for Women, a state-owned daily reported on Friday.

The conference, held Thursday on International Women’s Day, also condemned the 1978 U.N. convention against gender discrimination saying it was “incompatible with the values of Islamic sharia” law, the Al-Ahram newspaper reported.

Remember, the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate organization, or so say our apologists in the West.  And, as all can see, it is taking a very moderate position by making women 2nd class citizens in their own country again.

But *cough, cough* they don’t “endorse” gender discrimination.  Got it?

~McQ

Twitter: @McQandO

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks

27 Responses to Egypt, “Arab Spring” and International Women’s Day

  • Ragspierre says:

    Hey….all “good and necessary”. So we must “watch and learn”. Oh, and….uh…Facebook!

    • looker says:

      @Ragspierre “Oh, and….uh…Facebook!” To be followed in a few years by Face-Palm when women rise to the lofty level of property again in Egypt, reminding their daughters it’s “good and necessary” to be chattel under sharia and they must “watch and learn” if they don’t want their brothers or fathers to be forced to kill them for the sake of the family honor.

      • Ragspierre says:

        @looker Yeah, well…you know…eggs…broken…the future will be different…blah, blah…

        • looker says:

          @Ragspierre They probably deserve it, clinging to outmoded 20th century dogma and all.

    • DocD says:

      @Ragspierre Ahhh the Hairspray view of history. Yes, watched it last night (the 2007 remake). New technology will inevitably make things right, the kids are OK, progress is inevitable, turn on… tune in… drop out, etc etc etc. The only thing correct about this view is, ummm, let me see… Amanda Bynes is damn cute?

  • martinmcphillips says:

    Despite being banned and hounded for decades by the ruling military regime, the MB and the military regime have one very important thing in commone They’re both socialist. The Brotherhood will eventually prevail with all things Sharia and the military itself will be increasinly Islamicized. But given that Egypt is already in end-stage socialism, the Sharia-intensive Brotherhood will be a big help. As the Egyptian economy gets worse, the Brotherhood will play a key role in keeping the lid on the Egyptian public. They will usher in a new era of repression that will make the old era of repression look like fun. “It’s Springtime for the Brotherhood in E-E-gypt. The Nile land is happy once again.”

    • Ragspierre says:

      @martinmcphillips Libya was socialist, too, as was Iraq under Sad’em. What’s up with that? I would’ve figured is was enimical to Islam…being all “sciency” an’ stuff…

      • martinmcphillips says:

        @Ragspierre I don’t know the exact provenance of Qaddaffi’s socialism, but he was a Soviet client, so perhaps that’s where he got his inspiration. Ba’athism in Iraq and Syria was national socialism cooked up by two Arab intellectuals living in France during WWII who admired Nazism. It was an easy fit.

      • looker says:

        @Ragspierre Since Socialism as instituted by most socialists has invariably been more or less monarchy “socialism” is pretty much whatever the monarchs declare it to be. I don’t think Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Saddam, Mohammar or Kim had any shortage of cash or were stinted much in being treated as royalty. If the people want to think they’re living in a socialist paradise, fine. Even the Roman government (Republican and Imperial) subsidized the purchase of grain to make sure the populace ate, which is certainly a populist/socialist position. So you tell the average Libyan or Saddam Iraqi he’s living in a socialist state, he knows what’s really going on, and if he wants to go on living, he doesn’t say much by way of disagreement.

        • DocD says:

          @looker Yeah but you see Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Saddam, Kim and Mohammar never went to school in Frankfurt to learn *real* socialism.

        • Ragspierre says:

          @DocD I’m often put in mind of the “patented Ed Asner response” to the question of, “Are you a Communist”. He smiled and said, “What’s a Communist?”, meaning, “How do you define that?”. In my case, I don’t care about their pedigree. I watch what they do. Obama is a radical Collectivist thug.

        • DocD says:

          @Ragspierre Well I passed through Frankfurt last week and didn’t see Ed about. But as we have been lectured, Frankfurters don’t like commies (too much competition) so no surprise there. I suppose we will soon be told there are no true socialists, when you get right down to it.

        • Ragspierre says:

          @DocD Ah, like the “no true Scot” fallacy. Actually, I expect that. And all other fallacies.

        • DocD says:

          @Ragspierre “no true Scot” … is that a Maineish pun? ;) But yes, I had the Scotsmen in mind.

  • Neo_ says:

    It’s not discrimination when it’s just not allowed.

  • Ragspierre says:

    Just heard Steyn talking about a ruling in Egypt exonerating an Egyptian doc for performing “virginity tests” on protesting women in army custody. Rape is institutional now in Egypt, and made clinical. So, that happened.

  • The Shark says:

    Nevermind this run the country crap…..will they pay for contraception? Everyone knows those are TRUE women’s rights!

    • looker says:

      @The Shark Right, Girls just want to have fun.

    • DocD says:

      @The Shark How can women possibly run the country when they are, on average, getting laid 3 times a day?

      • looker says:

        @DocD Now, consider the fact that there are fewer men than women…..someone is working overtime.

    • Harun says:

      @The Shark Just as an aside, I asked my wife if Taiwan’s national healthcare covered contraception. The answer shocked me “No, that’s your own personal stuff.”

      • looker says:

        @Harun They’re mad, mad! Clearly contraception is an inalienable right!

        • Harun says:

          @looker All my lefty expat friends in Taiwan who were screaming on Facebook never answered when I sweetly inquired if this was true. Because they all love the state healthcare.

  • Pingback: Egypt, “Arab Spring” and International Women’s Day | Liberal Whoppers

  • Harun says:

    Does Facebook have a better chance of making Egypt democratic or taking out Kony?

    I vote Kony.