Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Ammo

Divider

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks
Click HERE for Kindle version

Divider

Posts By Date
May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
Old QandO
Facebook

Politics Top Blogs

Free Markets, Free People

 


Harry Reid: Good For Me, But Not Thee

 

Democrats have become rather adept at including things in bills which the Republicans don’t support but because of the overall bill in which they’re included, can’t vote against.   The hate crime legislation is a good example – it was included in a bill which authorized defense spending.

Apparently Republicans are trying to play the same game now:

Senate leaders remained at an impasse Wednesday over adding tax provisions to a bill that would extend unemployment insurance benefits to millions of jobless workers.

The impasse:

But Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., remained at loggerheads on what other amendments the chamber might consider. Republicans have been pushing for amendments on the community group ACORN and on the E-Verify system that checks potential employees’ immigration status.

Turnabout is fair play in politics, but Harry Reid finds this all to be just a terrible bother:

Reid called those amendments “vexatious,” “argumentative,” and “not relevant.”

Of course when Reid is adding hate crime legislation to a defense appropriation bill, it isn’t at all vexatious, argumentative or “not relevant”. It was simply business as usual.

~McQ

Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks

5 Responses to Harry Reid: Good For Me, But Not Thee

  • shark says:

    Reid’s time is running short. He’s merely keeping his Senate seat warm for the next guy at this point.

  • docjim505 says:

    MiniTru has been celebrating the hate crimes legislation (i.e. the “Some Americans Are More Equal Than Others Under Law Than Others Act of 2009″).  But I have to wonder:

    If the legislation is that good and that vital, why wasn’t it passed as a stand-alone bill?  Why was it tagged onto a DEFENSE bill, fer cryin’ out loud?  Why did the dems have to resort to trickery?

    I think we all know the answer.

    At any rate, this business of tagging one bill onto another, huge, unrelated bill is ridiculous and needs to stop.

    Fat chance.

  • Pingback: Harry Reid: Good For Me, But Not Thee | Financial and Economic news

  • Terry says:

    Why did the dems have to resort to trickery?

    I think we all know the answer.

    Obviously because of the huge Republican majority in the . . .

    wait…

  • Mark David Burns says:

    Harry Reid definitely suffers from “Chronic Cerebral Flatulence”!—-Coney