Free Markets, Free People


Are Dems closing the enthusiasm gap?

There has been a lot of assertion flying around the net about how Democrats are “closing the enthusiasm” gap.  The question, of course, is whether or not that’s actually true.  Certainly any number or races are tightening as should be expected with 8 days to go before an election.  And both sides are ginning up their Get Out The Vote drives – critical to a win.  You also have the President and VP hitting the road for  any number of at-risk candidates thereby punching up the visibility of those candidates and stirring up the base (although the level of enthusiasm among some base groups lags 2008’s).

But are the Democrats really closing the enthusiasm gap?

POLITICO seems to think the latest information from early voting says “no”.

POLITICO surveyed early voting through Saturday in 20 states, and in 14 of the 15 that have voter registration by party, the GOP’s early turnout percentage is running ahead of the party’s share of statewide voter registration — whether measured against 2006 or 2008, when President Barack Obama’s campaign led to a surge in Democratic voter registration. As a result, Republicans say they’re turning the tables on the Democratic dominance of early voting that paved the way for Obama’s victory in 2008 — and that independents’ lean toward the GOP this year will do the rest.

Two important points there.  A) GOP turnout is running ahead of the party’s share of state wide voter registration.  That’s a very important indicator of where the enthusiasm lies.  When that sort of an advantage gained, history shows the results are usually favorable for the party that does so.  B) Independents are more pro-GOP than pro-Democrat this time around.  Each of the parties command about 30 to 35% brand loyalty in any election.  It may go higher in some as the early voting indicates it is for the GOP this time.  However, everyone understands that the party faithful alone can’t swing an election.  It takes persuading independents to sign on and vote for the party to close the deal.   Independents have shown consistently in polls that they’re favoring the GOP this time around.

Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight has taken a look at the early voting as well, and comes to pretty much the same conclusion as does POLITICO:

So, the various estimates of early voting data each show an edge for Republicans: their voters have been slightly more inclined that Democrats in most states thus far. Under the most favorable set of assumptions for them, their advantage is around 9 points; by the least favorable set of assumptions, it is more like a 4-point edge.

These figures ought to seem familiar to regular readers of this blog. How come? Because they are very close to the enthusiasm gap as inferred by the consensus of pollsters — who, on average, show Republican candidates performing about 6 points better among likely voters than among registered voters — although their advantage varies from state to state and from polling firm to polling firm.

Take a look at Silver’s full analysis – probably one of the most exhaustive you’ll find.  It holds up pretty well and it underlines the fact that the reports of a Democratic comeback – a closing of the “enthusiasm gap” – is founded more in “hope” than reality.  He concludes:

Overall, however, the early voting data does not provide compelling reason to reject the consensus among pollsters, which is that the enthusiasm gap is most likely to manifest itself in a mid-to-high single digit turnout advantage for Republicans. When coupled with the edge that Republican candidates have among independent voters in most races, this suggests that they are liable to have a pretty good year [emphasis mine].

That seems to me to be a reasonable conclusion despite a rising tide of media stories implying that Democrats are coming back.  There’s little reason to believe independents will begin to reverse their trend away from Democrats at this late date.  There has been absolutely nothing happen that would trigger such a reverse. 

Keep all this in mind as you read more stories that I’d put in the “whistling past the graveyard” category about Democrats keeping the House, etc.  While I don’t believe the dire predictions of 70 or 80 seats there switching sides, I do believe more than enough will turn over to give the GOP a majority.

~McQ

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Print
  • Google Bookmarks

12 Responses to Are Dems closing the enthusiasm gap?

  • Have you ever noticed the Cheerleaders of a football team losing by a score of 63-0 early in the 3rd quarter?  They are still out there calling out their cheers:  “Hold That Line” to a team that hasn’t held much for the whole game unless it garnered a penalty; “Push ‘Em Back” has by this time reached wishful thinking status; “Two bit, Four Bits, Six Bits a Quarter” is about all this team is worth by this time; and the rest goes on and on.  Eternal Optimism?  Not hardly – in reality it is simply what Cheerleaders do!  They just Lead Cheers!

  • “Are Dems Closing The Enthusiasm Gap?”
    No.
    With what would they close it, dear Liza, dear Liza…?

  • But the Democrats task is hard …

    “I was amazed at the amount of money, this $200 billion of money that is — where there’s no accountability,” he [Joe Biden] said.

    … now that’s just not right.

  • Remember how Palin’s intellect or lack thereof was a danger to civilization? Funny how MSM ignores Biden.

    • They have done that from the start.  Couric has been lauded for her tough interview with Palin, but she got pretty much no grief for allowing Biden to slide, particularly on his “President FDR went on TV in ’29” crack.

  • Ragspierre: with voter fraud, dear Henry, dear Henry…

    • Ah, but that is not enthusiasm, dear Liza, dear Liza.  That’s just thuggery.
      And even THAT requires some degree of motivation.  I think even voter fraud is running low this year…

  • Let’s not forget the horse race aspect of political reporting. These people need a race. The trajectory of the current story is not very exciting for a reporter. The Democrats, behind by six furlongs are putting on more speed in a valiant attempt at reclaiming the lead from the Republicans. All signs point to the potential for a photo finish, which is very exciting!
    That’s the story they want to write, so they sort through the entrails of as many polls and early voting reports as they can to find evidence to support their preferred story. Who would watch the news or read a paper if the headline was “Same story as yesterday”.

    • Yes, indeed. Plus the fact that for many in the legacy media, their own internal sympathies are with the Democrats. So much of their “silver lining” reporting has an element of wish fulfillment in it. As you pointed out, they see what they need and want to see.


  • Do you follow political leaders on Twitter? If you want to be part of a short, academic survey on how and why people follow political leaders on Twitter, please click here: https://survey.unf.edu/survey/se.ashx?s=5A1E27D26911EC6E

  • THIS JUST IN !  Polls always narrow close to the election.

  • I have followed Bruce’s prognostications since at least 2004. He had a pretty good record in that election and in most since then.  He doesn’t get too carried away with conventional wisdom, and understands and can explain the subtleties of polling.