Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
"a triumph for the idea of freedom and democracy"
Posted by: Jon Henke on Monday, December 19, 2005

The War on Terror has often been compared to other various historical conflicts—e.g., the Barbary Coast War, WWII, Vietnam, etc—with varying degrees of accuracy. It's also been compared, in terms of geopolitical strategy, length and scope, to the Cold War.

Interestingly, the War on Terror is being waged on some of the same grounds—the superiority of democracy and of our values—on which we waged the Cold War.

All these years later, it's easy to forget the fundamental rationale for our policies during the Cold War, but—as we go into another major, potentially generation-long struggle against a competing value system—we ought to recall some of the defining principles of our previous victory. They are best encapsulated in two seminal documents from the beginning of the Cold War.

NSC-68 laid out the National Security Strategy and ideology of the United States going into the Cold War...
  1. Thus we must make ourselves strong, both in the way in which we affirm our values in the conduct of our national life, and in the development of our military and economic strength.

  2. We must lead in building a successfully functioning political and economic system in the free world. It is only by practical affirmation, abroad as well as at home, of our essential values, that we can preserve our own integrity, in which lies the real frustration of the Kremlin design. ...


In a shrinking world, which now faces the threat of atomic warfare, it is not an adequate objective merely to seek to check the Kremlin design, for the absence of order among nations is becoming less and less tolerable. This fact imposes on us, in our own interests, the responsibility of world leadership. It demands that we make the attempt, and accept the risks inherent in it, to bring about order and justice by means consistent with the principles of freedom and democracy.
George Kennan's Long Telegram put it succinctly...
Finally we must have courage and self-confidence to cling to our own methods and conceptions of human society. [After all], the greatest danger that can befall us in coping with this problem of Soviet communism, is that we shall allow ourselves to become like those with whom we are coping.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
And we should also remind ourselves that all to often, the government bent the rules in pursuit of defending those principles.
 
Written By: Keith, Indy
URL: http://
I think the Cold War/War on Terror analogy is quite valid, both are defensive strategies.
1 - Thus we must make ourselves strong, both in the way in which we affirm our values in the conduct of our national life, and in the development of our military and economic strength.

2 - We must lead in building a successfully functioning political and economic system in the free world. It is only by practical affirmation, abroad as well as at home, of our essential values, that we can preserve our own integrity, in which lies the real frustration of the Kremlin design. ...
Those two points of defensive strategy were forced upon the USA by the parity of American/Russian forces. An aggressive strategy could have decided the outcome of the Cold War much quicker, but would have likely destroyed both countries.

A semi-defensive posture has been devoloped in this War on Terror that is similar to the Cold War - the USA does not attack the theocracies of Iran and Saudi directly, just like it did not attack Russia or China. The current enemy is mostly harmless (completely unarmed compared to the USSR) and so could be crushed easily, but why bother? The Cold War strategy worked (in the end) and when economic hardship becomes unbearable & an educated class forms in Saudi & Iran those regimes the strategy will work again (when the oil runs out...in 2070).
 
Written By: Unaha-closp
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider