Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
House Republican Leadership: insurgent libertarians
Posted by: Jon Henke on Friday, January 13, 2006

We QandO bloggers have signed onto the NZ Bear, Glenn Reynolds and Hugh Hewitt led effort to warn the GOP that....
The new leadership in the House of Representatives needs to be thoroughly and transparently free of the taint of the Jack Abramoff scandals, and beyond that, of undue influence of K Street.
Most importantly, I think, "we call for major changes to increase openness, transparency and accountability in Congressional operations and in the appropriations process."

The entry of Congressman John Shadegg into the race for Majority Leader is, I think, a notable moment. Notable, because, as Below the Beltway notes, Shadegg is a member of the Republican Liberty Caucus. [RLC]

The RLC is, essentially, the group of libertarians who choose to work within the Republican Party to "to elect pro-liberty individuals to office". More information about the RLC can be found here, and you can join the RLC here.

It seems to me that the ascension of a Republican Liberty Caucus member to the leadership of the House of Representatives — combined with the good work being done by Rep. Mike Pence in the Republican Study Committee — would mark a remarkable shift in the balance of power within the Republican Party away from the religious right and toward the limited government faction.

Please, blog this, speak out and make sure the GOP recognizes the importance of this moment. And the price they may pay if they fail.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
1. One of your links ("Below the Beltway") is wrong.
2. How come you guys aren’t on the RLC’s reading list?
 
Written By: Crank
URL: http://www.baseballcrank.com
Anything to stop the big spending dinosaurs...
 
Written By: aclay
URL: http://
I have tried to sign on, even though I have been inexplicably blacklisted from the Ecosystem and have a bone to pick with the Bear. This is more important than my petty complaints.
 
Written By: Random Numbers
URL: http://randomnumbers.us
Hey does anyone know anything about Blognation? My blog has disappeared and now I got no way to even contact them. What is more I think someone stole my blog account. Man, this sucks
 
Written By: Kyle N
URL: http://
The pro-life folk in the Reps will continue to be very strong, if not dominant. They represent the actual voters who give victories.


Look at 3 election issues: Iraq War; Tax Cuts/ economy; Moral Values, based on Pew surveys of what is most important.

21 mil for Bush; 21 mil for Kerry on Iraq/ Terrorism.
8 mil for Bush; 30 mil for Kerry on Tax Cuts.
27 mil for Bush; 4 mil for Kerry on Moral Values.

Libertarian type tax-cutting Reps with 8 mil voters ain’t gonna run the Rep party from an honest strength.

I wish big gov’t spending wasn’t as important to Dems; but it is. However, more Libs, with more Liberatarian kinda thinking, is most likely to be better.

I’m now a pro-life Libertarian Paternalist; registered Rep.

 
Written By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad
URL: http://tomgrey.motime.com
1. One of your links ("Below the Beltway") is wrong.
2. How come you guys aren’t on the RLC’s reading list?
1) Thanks, fixed it.
2) Reading list?
The pro-life folk in the Reps will continue to be very strong, if not dominant. They represent the actual voters who give victories.
The problem, as I see it, is that libertarians have never formed a political coalition. Really, they’ve never done anything but proselytize and balkinize; they beg people to be libertarian, following which they excommunicate them for being insufficiently libertarian.

The movement needs organization. An actual, elected caucus of influential members sharing our goals of limited government would be a remarkable first step.
 
Written By: Jon Henke
URL: http://www.QandO.net
you hit the nail on the head, henke.
 
Written By: marcia rice
URL: http://
Hey, Jon!

A little premature navel-gazing on my part: First, EU rumblings about bringing Iran before the UNSC, and now a "liberty" candidate for the GOP House leadership - are my ’06 predictions coming true? Could a Lib-caucus be rearing its "insurgent" head - finally?

If the GOP votes for this Liberty candidate, rather than fuel the creation of a separate Lib-faction, the party could effectively co-opt the "Libertarian" platform and market it under the GOP party label.

Either outcome - an organized "Lib-caucus", or a reformed, Libertarian GOP - will contest the veracity of the Democrats’ tactical civil-libertarianism.
-Steve


 
Written By: Steve
URL: http://
Book, I think you have to be a GOP house member to pick a horse in this race.

Birthing a cohesive Libertarian movement will take "organization." "Limited Government" is a catch-phase for the Libertarian ideal of low-taxes, limited governmental intervention in the free economy, and the assertion of all private individuals’ responsibility for their own lot in life.

I don’t always agree with Jon, but I’m wondering exactly what it is that you find "pithy" about his comment.

Or were you being sarcastic?
-Steve
 
Written By: Steve
URL: http://
While I have signed my blog on to this document, it’s neither a full support nor a blind one. My concern is the last time we had a "reformer" within the the GOP, it ended up being John McCain. that some experience in pain I’d just as soon not repeat. I see indications in John Shadegg’s past that suggest another McCain in the offing. (Shudder)
 
Written By: Bithead
URL: http://bitheads.blogspot.com
"I see indications in John Shadegg’s past that suggest another McCain in the offing. (Shudder)"

Interesting, could you list a few?

Yours, TDP, ml, msl, & pfpp
 
Written By: Tom Perkins
URL: http://
NRO is officially endorsing Shadegg. Right on the top of their page.
 
Written By: OrneryWP
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider