Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Congressional Democrats: Ignorance or do they just not care? (Update)
Posted by: McQ on Tuesday, April 03, 2007

I want to spend a couple of minutes on a statement a commenter made the other day when I was pointing out that this refusal of the Democrats to finalize the supplemental spending bill prior to going on "spring break" will adversely effect the troops they claim to support. My point is that when you have to shift money from one area to fund another there are unintended consequences which, in the end, will hurt those fighting the war, those preparing for war, those wounded in war and military dependents.

Said the commenter: "The troops will be "suffering"? Please. No one is going to notice any difference."

Don't you just love that sentiment? Real support from someone who obviously doesn't have a clue. Let me lay some things out here for you. As you recall (and if you don't, go to the link above) the Congressional Research Service said that if the Army began shifting funds from other areas to the Operations and Maintenance budget (i.e. the warfighting budget), it could continue its warfighting until the middle of July before it ran completely out of money. That was supposed to justify Democratic dallying with finalizing the supplemental to send to the President.

One of the many areas (facilities repair and upkeep, training, etc) that the CRS said would be effected is "depot maintenance". Now for those who don't know what that entails, that doesn't mean a whole bunch. So what is depot maintenence?

Well here's a short answer:
Army Depot Maintenance provides the Army with the industrial capability to repair, overhaul, and upgrade weapon systems and equipment; store and distribute ammunition, war reserve material, and other selected items; and provide tenant support to Army and other DoD Activities. Depot Maintenance Activities both compete and partner with private industry to deliver goods and services efficiently and effectively.
Got that? "Repair, overhaul and upgrade weapons systems and equipment; store and distribute ammunition, war reserve material and other selected items ..."

Anniston Army Depot, a 24/7 operation repairs, overhauls and upgrades Abrams tanks and Bradleys. Those are items critical to our warfighting ability. Shut down Anniston even briefly, or severely curtail their ability to function and you've just stopped the flow of that war material.

Corpus Christi Army Depot is also a 24/7 operation which repairs, overhauls and upgrades Apache, Blackhawk and Chinook helicopters for the Army. Imagine a helicopter going down for whatever reason in Iraq. Float helicopters, most likely kept in Kuwait, replace that helicopter. Say it's a Blackhawk. Imagine curtailing or shutting down CCAD even briefly. The flow is stopped. The Blackhawk isn't replaced, and the next medivac call in Iraq goes unanswered.

And, of course the other three depots are doing Humvees, electronics, etc ... 24/7 in support of the war effort.

Another area which obviously will be impacted by shifting funds away from it is the Army Supply Management system.
Army Supply Management, under the command of Army Materiel Command (AMC), buys and maintains assigned stocks of materiel for sale to various customers, primarily Army operating units. The Army's equipment and operational readiness and its combat capability are directly linked to the availability of this materiel.
Do you understand that last line? What it says is that unless this system can procure "stocks of materials" vital to Army units, their "equipment and operational readiness" as well as their "combat capability" are directly effected.

Again, any stoppage or slow down in the ability to procure and distribute these materials has a direct impact on our units in the field and their combat capability.

Of course the denier's answer is to take materials from those here in CONUS if necessary and shift it to Iraq.

But many of those CONUS units are training for deployment into Iraq. So with the critical equipment shortages this will cause, how do they effectively train? If, as Democrats claim, they want units deploying to be fully combat capable, why in the world are they claiming that the Army has enough money to fight its war until mid-July.

Do they just not understand how this all works?

Or do they just not care?

UPDATE: Peter Fenn is one who doesn't get it:
And now Bush thinks he can blame Democrats for not providing the funding? The Congress has voted for everything the president has asked for, every time he has asked for it. In some cases they have added more than he requested for veterans and body armor. Congress, with these supplementals, will have authorized a grand total of $564 billion for the war. We are now spending $8.4 billion in Iraq every month — that’s $194,444 every minute.
Well that's nice, Peter, but as noted above, voting for something doesn't put the money necessary where it needs to be until it is signed into law. And that doesn't happen until a final bill is hammered out and signed. But the funding ball (or lack thereof) is in the Democrat's court until they do so. Once they do so, and Bush vetoes it, that's another matter altogether.

Until then it is perfectly correct to tag them with the responsibility of not funding the troops.

Then Fenn says:
And now the non-partisan Congressional Research Service tells Congress that with funds already appropriated we have until July before we have funding difficulties. So Bush will have his escalation, no matter what the Congress or the people have to say. And, oh yes, by the way, last year Bush waited to sign the supplemental until June 16.
Well that's right. That's because the bill wasn't passed until around then due to the usual Democratic shennanigans in the Senate, such as the Levin (Levin Amdt. No. 4320; To state the sense of Congress on United States policy on Iraq.) and Kerry amendments (Kerry Amdt. No. 4442; To require the redeployment of United States Armed Forces from Iraq in order to further a political solution in Iraq, encourage the people of Iraq to provide for their own security, and achieve victory in the war on terror.) etc. And, of course the bill didn't make it through the House before 5/25/06, and hadn't even been to committee yet.

Last, but certainly most important, in the meantime as surge has been planned and implemented. Last year the funds were adequate for a short delay. This year, because of the new tactics and additional troops, funds aren't adequate for a short delay.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Do they just not understand how this all works?

Or do they just not care?
A little from column A, a little from column B...
 
Written By: Scott
URL: http://
I can’t speak for this particular commenter, but with some of the folks I talk to in person, they understand exactly what they need to understand to blame Bush and exonerate Democrats. They are willfully blind to anything else.
 
Written By: Billy Hollis
URL: http://
Logistical note: I’m returning today from a ten day trip. So I might actually be pack to posting something in the next couple of days.
 
Written By: Billy Hollis
URL: http://
If the army wasn’t broken before, the Dem’s look like they’re doing their damnedest to make sure it will be come june.
 
Written By: ChrisB
URL: http://
If the army wasn’t broken before, the Dem’s look like they’re doing their damnedest to make sure it will be come june.
Which is good, see Glasnost and the Left’s focus on the "Broken Military" see they CREATE the Broken Military and then they BLAME BUSH for it...
 
Written By: Joe
URL: http://
Do they just not understand how this all works?

Or do they just not care?
They care alright....just not about winning.

Well, they do care about winning, but the enemy they’re fighting is Bush.

Not a single one of them cares about the nation
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
"Shut down Anniston even briefly, or severely curtail their ability to function and you’ve just stopped the flow of that war material."

And of course when you shut down a facility, the employees, outside contractors and suppliers are laid off, but perhaps this kind of collateral damage is acceptable.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
Mr. Fenn’s biopage at "The Hill" indicates much admirable work in media, but none, naturally, in running a lemonade stand. There has been comment that the Pentagon can forestall the effects of delayed funding by moving and re-prioritizing pools of operating cash. You think frictional costs are tough to handle (and swallow) in the private sector? Think about when you’ve got an army of government Dilberts trying to make field changes, allocations, justify variances, etc., etc., etc...
 
Written By: stevesh
URL: http://
timactual: "And of course when you shut down a facility, the employees, outside contractors and suppliers are laid off, but perhaps this kind of collateral damage is acceptable."

Casualties of the Bush economy, sadly...

Or haven’t you read your Democrat Spin Manual this week?
 
Written By: Brad Warbiany
URL: http://unrepentantindividual.com/
You mention that the depots work on Humvees, but to elaborate on that, ANAD does a LOT of Humvee uparmoring. I guess somehow these folks that saw the lack of armor on humvees as malfeasence by the Bush Administration suddenly don’t think that it’s important anymore.

ANAD also holds the permit for the Anniston Chemical Demilitarization Facility (ANCDF). That is the facility that is responsible for complying with the CW Treaty by destroying the portion of the US chemical weapons inventory stored on the depot. THAT seems like a really, really good place to cut corners because the funding had to be diverted to the troops in the field( :-P ). They are currently working on VX weapons.
 
Written By: Terry
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider