March 17, 2004

Reality begins to dawn in Europe
Posted by McQ

It looks like a new awareness is beginning to dawn in Europe:

The Islamist forces behind the Madrid bombings "confirmed that they can choose the moment and the target with a frightening precision," says the French daily Le Figaro (in French).

"The bombs of Madrid have shown us how much we are without defense and how much our knowledge of the terrorists is insufficient," says Le Figaro. "Each country can be hit, whether or not it has participated, like Spain, in the Iraq war, whether or not it has decided, like France, to forbid Islamic headscarves in the schools."

So, per Le Figero, Iraq is really irrelevant to the jihadists. Its all about the west.

March 11, said the Milan daily Corriere della Sera (in Italian), "is going to be more important than 11 September" for Europe. The Madrid attacks they say, mark the beginning of "a European war that the [European] Union is going to have to fight from now on with a far greater degree of unity and solidarity than it has shown over the past few months."

Actually it doesn't mark the "beginning" of a European war, it simpy has awakened those that have been denying the war's existance on for some time now.

In London, the Guardian says "emergency security meetings across Europe yesterday signaled the deepening recognition that the 200 deaths in four trains blown up in Madrid on Thursday probably constitute more than just a domestic Spanish terrorist event." The leftist London daily says no European nation will be spared, no matter what its past stance on the war on terror or Iraq.

Which is what the US has been trying to point out to the naysayers since 9/11.

"Only a dreamer would believe that Germany will not be attacked," say the editors of Bild, Germany's best-selling tabloid. "Islamic terrorists are waging a war against the West, not just against individual countries."

Welcome to the real world, Germany. You of all countries should understand what aggressors do to appeasers.

Sociologist Emilio Lamo de Espinosa says Europeans have been dreaming. Writing in Le Monde (in French), Lamo says Europeans have thought they would be spared because they haven't supported the Bush administration's policies.

And were quite smug about it as well, weren't they? Crow, I understand, is best eaten warm.

"When the Americans declared war on terrorism, many of us thought they exaggerated. Many thought terrorism was not likely to occur on our premises, [inhabited by] peaceful and civilized Europeans who speak no evil of anybody, who dialogue, who are the first [to] send assistance and offer cooperation. We are pacifists, they are warmongers. . . . . Don't we defend the Palestinians? Are we not pro-Arab and anti-Israeli?"

Yes. And it has bought you NOTHING. You're as much a target as any "infidel".

Wake up calls come in various forms and fashions. This one came in the blood and lives of 200 Spaniards. It should have come with the 3,000 lives in New York. But much of Europe was too smug and arrogant to consider they might be next. It tut-tutted when the cowboy Americans went after the terrorists. It shook its ancient finger at the upstart and explained, condecendingly, why America was wrong. It banked on appeasment being the coin that would sway terror to look elsewhere for its victims.

They were wrong. Madrid's atrocity says it IS finally time to wake up to the reality of Islamic terrorism ... isn't it, Europe?


TrackBack

Comments

So, a few newspaper articles that are relatively sane, and suddenly Europe "gets it"? Nawww, I don't think so. Most Europeans still think George Bush is a greater threat to the world then terrorism -- until THAT changes, Europe is still stuck in la-la land. It will take more large attacks to wake them up to reality.

Posted by: bob at March 18, 2004 07:30 AM

I don't believe I said anything about Europe finally "getting it" Bob ... I said the reality of the situation is finally beginning to DAWN on Europe as indicated by these articles.

An important first step.

Posted by: McQ at March 18, 2004 08:06 AM

McQ-
I believe the election results in Spain tell us that the exact opposite of your hypothesis is actually occurring. By voting in a party that seeks only to appease the perpetrators of the bombings, it is clear that Spain, at least is quite happy to stick it’s collective head further into the sand.

Posted by: Curt Mitchell at March 18, 2004 08:45 AM

Curt - I think, based on what I've read, that the Spanish vote was composed of both anger and emotion. Anger at the sitting government for its poor attempt to blame it on ETA (this simply did not fit the ETA profile by any stretch) instead of another group. Politically it was to the advantage of the government to blame ETA. It was to its disadvantage to blame AQ or another entity. I believe that anger and emotion snowballed into the vote you saw. The sitting government was the easiest target for the populace to lash out against.

What I've read since says there may be a lot of regret among a significant portion of the electorate for having done what they did electorially. And the incoming PM isn't making it easier for them to be comfy with their vote.

So I'd say that's still a developing story ... with the socialists coming into a very difficult situation as pertains to governance (they're still going to have to form a coalition to rule).

Couple that with the threats France has received concerning its "headscarf" law (France being a decidedly pro-Arab, anti-Iraq war country) and the "dawning" has begun.

As they're suddenly discovering, this isn't about Iraq. Its about a clash of cultures. The feudal Islamic world against the "degenerate" but modern and technological west.

It always has been.

Posted by: McQ at March 18, 2004 09:07 AM