QandOQuestions and Observations |
||
|
||
| Comments | ||
|
Everything with these douchebags is Nazi, nazi, nazi, Hitler. Get these fuckwads down to the Holocaust Museum and let them learn what Nazi and Hitler REAALLY mean. Ignorant fuckwits... Posted by: shark at April 12, 2004 01:09 PM |
||
|
Isn't it about time we had Godwin's Law codified at the UN? Posted by: Jon Henke at April 12, 2004 01:13 PM |
||
|
Amritsar, the Black Hole of Calcutta, Long Kesh, Posted by: NARCISO at April 12, 2004 01:51 PM |
||
|
"Godwin's Law" was utterly idiotic by the time it first hit Usenet, Jon. There really are sometimes valid comparisons to be made between Hitler and others, and this ridiculous "law" is most often simply an excuse to dodge the necessary implications of principles. The answer to your question is: no. There is no arbitrary "law" to be applied to something so dependent on context. Generally, when I see someone invoke this, I know I'm in the presence of a person who finds thought strenuous, and who should not bother to try. Posted by: Billy Beck at April 12, 2004 02:09 PM |
||
|
If this is true, they don't make Brit generals the way they used to -- and I've encountered at least one in my life. The more typical British officer is like a Royal Navy captain who was giving a talk in Newmarket, Suffolk, on why they -- and we Yanks -- were opposing the Soviet Union and its allies. I'll call him Captain Jack. After his presentation, some Brit matron asked in an imperious tone, "when is all this madness going to end?" Without hesitation, Captain Jack dropped into his best John Cleese persona, clapped his hands together and said, "Right! When is all the madness going to end?" Then he proceeded to apply a few irrefutable facts to the stuffy matron. They still make them like that, don't they? Posted by: George at April 12, 2004 04:55 PM |
||
|
Unclench, Billy. It was a joke. I don't think Godwin's Law should really be a law. In fact, I don't think the UN makes "laws" in the first place. I think "Godwin's Law" has a place when it comes to hyperbole, though there are certainly instances where Hitler is a good comparison. He is, after all, a perfect archetype for a great many evils. I like you, and I think you're an intelligent fellow...but it's quite annoying to have somebody suggest I find "thought strenuous" when they merely disagree with me. Or fail to understand my comment. Posted by: Jon Henke at April 12, 2004 05:07 PM |
||
|
Jon -- See that word, "generally"? There is a reason for that. I was not talking about you. If I had been, I would have said so. Posted by: Billy Beck at April 13, 2004 12:16 AM |
||
|
In that case, I apologize for my last paragraph. Posted by: Jon Henke at April 13, 2004 05:44 AM |
||
|
Nothin' to it. It can take a while to get to know each other like this. Posted by: Billy Beck at April 13, 2004 05:53 PM |
||
|
Heh....text is an amazingly limited means of communication, isn't it? Posted by: Jon Henke at April 13, 2004 06:05 PM |
||
|
You know what? I find it nearly completely the reverse. As long as everyone understands and attends the precision that the medium demands, it really works for me. It has been my experience, however, that fairly few people are disciplined to that aspect of it. It's as if they grow up taking written words for granted all their lives, and all the bolt-holes get sloppy, over time. I'll tell you what, though: a decade of intense activity online will either sharpen one's edges or drive him straight to heroin. Posted by: Billy Beck at April 13, 2004 10:20 PM |
||