Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Pitching AGW To An Ignorant Crowd, Hansen’s Hysteria Could Cost Us Dearly
Posted by: McQ on Sunday, January 18, 2009

If Al Gore is AGW's "Hysteric-in-Chief", James Hansen has to be the VHIC. And he's out with the newest doomsday "runaway greenhouse effect" prediction in one of coldest winters in a few decades:
Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that action will have to be taken within Obama's first administration, he added.

Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding, widespread species loss and major disruptions of weather patterns in the near future. "We cannot afford to put off change any longer," said Hansen. "We have to get on a new path within this new administration. We have only four years left for Obama to set an example to the rest of the world. America must take the lead."
That's right, folks, only 4 years. Convenient, wouldn't you say? A perfect save at the end of his term if Obama acts now to counteract those effects. Pay no attention to the economy, it's in the tank anyway. Instead, damn the deniers and a lot of science, full speed ahead.

And Hansen's science? Well not so hot, no pun intended.
Hansen's institute monitors temperature fluctuations at thousands of sites round the world, data that has led him to conclude that most estimates of sea level rises triggered by rising atmospheric temperatures are too low and too conservative.
But his published temperatures have been proven, multiple times, to contain the wrong data. In one case, Russian temperature data for September was copied on to the following month's data thereby making the month appear much warmer than it was.
The error not only affected October data, but due to the complex algorithm GISS uses to convert actual temperature readings into their output results, altered the previously published values for several other months as well. The values for August 2008, for instance, changed by 0.11C and the global anomaly as far back as 2005 increased by a hundredth of a degree.
NOAA blows off the mistake by saying they are only responsible for the temperature data in the US. However they have had no reticence at all for using the data provided (without, obviously, checking it) to push their AGW alarmism.

But that doesn't stop Hansen:
However, Hansen said feedbacks in the climate system are already accelerating ice melt and are threatening to lead to the collapse of ice sheets.
The ice sheet collapses he discusses are completely normal events having more to do with physics than any warming trend. And despite Hansen's hysteria about such collapses leading to raised ocean levels, scientists (real ones) say that's not the case. Ice shelves are floating to begin with, that's how they eventually break off and floating ice does not raise sea levels when it melts.

Speaking of trends, ice growth at both polls is the ongoing trend. And Alaska's glaciers have shown growth for the first time in 250 years.

But the VHIC has an audience including those who decided quite some time ago that all the science is in and all that can be learned about the climate is known. These "flat earthers" (hey, give me a better analogy and I'll use it) are unfortunately in political power right now and are convinced they must do something to stop these natural cycles, even as it appears we may now be heading into a cooling period.

So this is another among many battles shaping up in the coming few years along with healthcare, massive government deficit spending, expansion of entitlements and the nanny state, plus, I'm sure a few surprises. All are economy cripplers. Taken together they're economy killers. And as it's shaping up now in Washington DC, it appears you can begin writing our economy's obituary on Tuesday when a certain newly minted president's pen becomes functional.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Well, yeah, of course he has only 4 years to save the world. Because the world’s going to end on December 22nd, 2012. Sheesh, everybody knows that.
Written By: Steverino
URL: http://
Maybe it’s just me, but as time marches onward it’s really starting to seem like the whole AGW thing is little more than a gigantic bonfire of the vanities and Hansen is the principal fire-starter.

Written By: peter jackson
These "flat earthers" (hey, give me a better analogy and I’ll use it) ...
I call them ’hot earthers’ — which has, at least, put a stop to my brother spouting his AGW nonsense in my house.
Written By: Achillea
URL: http://
Hansen is recognizing that the window is closing and he’s making a desperate attempt. The shorter he pushes his doomsday predictions, the more foolish he looks and the sooner he will be dismissed entirely.
Written By: Grimshaw
URL: http://
Kids get this BS rammed down there throats in school. Since most of the ice on the north pole floats on the Arctic Ocean, my 10 year old grandson and I did a little experiment with melting ice and resulting water levels. We took a large glass, filled it with ice cubes and then added water until the ice floated. We then marked the water level with electrical tape. (To speed things up, I used warm water.) When all the ice had melted, guess where the water level was! Right on the tape. But then, Archimedes discovered that 2400 years ago.
Written By: Arch
URL: http://
A more cynical reading is that Hansen knows the window for action is closing because AGW will soon be fully discredited by reality. He is hoping that Obama and the Dems will fully cave and put extreme measures in place, then in 4 years the AGW crowd will take credit for saving the earth and insist that these measures will have to remain in place to keep AGW from re-starting.
Written By: mprell
URL: http://
Arch, it’s places like Greenland you need to be concerned about.

IF (note, caps...cause it ain’t happenin THIS winter...heh heh) Greenland were to melt the water level would rise.

But this is all panic at this point, they need to stir up as much panic as possible, get the laws in place before Mother Nature whacks them with a dose of "shut the F*** up" cooling temperatures over the next decade.

Of all my biggest fears of what the Dems can do with their two years (yeah, TomD, that’s ALL they’re going to get...) climate related legislations is nearly at the top of the list.
Written By: looker
URL: http://
Isn’t Hansen the Muppet guy?
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
Yeah, he’s Al Gore’s muppet. I think you are thinking of Jim Henson.
Written By: McQ
Since it is known that Greenland had farms much further north than now possible, why isn’t England’s history full of the great floods of 1200-1500 AD. And why didn’t the 100,000 year old animal species of polar bear die out then unless only in Greenland and east were so warm. But northern Canada was also warm from core drilling samples in recent years. Ah, Alaska must have remained cold just for the polar bear as the rest of the Northern Hemisphere warmed; that is the answer, no doubt one would hear.
Written By: amr
This AGW is really making things hard for students.
Written By: capt joe
URL: http://
I think you are thinking of Jim Henson.
Written By: Is
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks