Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
QandO has Moved
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
The Nuclear Option
Posted by: Dale Franks on Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Richard Bond writes that Robert Byrd (D-WV) condemning limitations on the use of the filibuster by Republicans is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
What do the deregulation of natural gas, the attachment of legislative amendments to appropriations bills, a defense authorization bill and the nomination of a U.S. ambassador to El Salvador have in common?

Answer: They all were resolved by a simple majority vote in the U.S. Senate under procedures altered by then-Majority Leader Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.

And now the crafty Byrd is rewriting history. He recently denounced Republican consideration of a parliamentary maneuver designed to clear the way for a simple majority vote on President George W. Bush's judicial nominees.

In blasting the GOP's so-called "nuclear option," Byrd invoked Hitler, Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy — drawing condemnation from Jewish leaders.

Beyond Byrd's rhetoric, now a staple among the Howard Dean-led Democrats, it is worth noting that Byrd is condemning Republicans for considering using a tactic that he himself used four times during his tenure as majority leader.
Someone in Washington just needs to slap Trent Lott for ever calling this the "Nuclear Option". Can we all agree that Trent Lott shouldn't be allowed to name things anymore? in fact, there should be a checklist of things Trent Lott can no longer do, and right at the top, it should say "Name things", right above where it says "Talk about the Segregation Era".

Anyway, the point is that, when they were in the majority, the Dems were perfectly comfortable shutting off the filibuster when it was in their interests to do so. So we can all stop pretending the filibuster is a revered tradition handed down from the mount, written by the finger of God on stone tablets.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Since the original meaning of filibuster was to invade a country with a private army, I suggest the filibuster be renamed "Doginthemangering".
 
Written By: Walter E. Wallis
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider