The Nuclear Option Posted by: Dale Franks
on Wednesday, April 13, 2005
Richard Bond writes that Robert Byrd (D-WV) condemning limitations on the use of the filibuster by Republicans is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
What do the deregulation of natural gas, the attachment of legislative amendments to appropriations bills, a defense authorization bill and the nomination of a U.S. ambassador to El Salvador have in common?
Answer: They all were resolved by a simple majority vote in the U.S. Senate under procedures altered by then-Majority Leader Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.
And now the crafty Byrd is rewriting history. He recently denounced Republican consideration of a parliamentary maneuver designed to clear the way for a simple majority vote on President George W. Bush's judicial nominees.
In blasting the GOP's so-called "nuclear option," Byrd invoked Hitler, Nazi Germany and Mussolini's Italy — drawing condemnation from Jewish leaders.
Beyond Byrd's rhetoric, now a staple among the Howard Dean-led Democrats, it is worth noting that Byrd is condemning Republicans for considering using a tactic that he himself used four times during his tenure as majority leader.
Someone in Washington just needs to slap Trent Lott for ever calling this the "Nuclear Option". Can we all agree that Trent Lott shouldn't be allowed to name things anymore? in fact, there should be a checklist of things Trent Lott can no longer do, and right at the top, it should say "Name things", right above where it says "Talk about the Segregation Era".
Anyway, the point is that, when they were in the majority, the Dems were perfectly comfortable shutting off the filibuster when it was in their interests to do so. So we can all stop pretending the filibuster is a revered tradition handed down from the mount, written by the finger of God on stone tablets.