Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Let the games begin ...
Posted by: McQ on Friday, July 01, 2005

Sandra Day O'Conner has announced her retirement from the US Supreme Court:
"This is to inform you of my decision to retire from my position as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, effective upon the nomination and confirmation of my successor," she said in a one-paragraph letter to Bush.

UPDATE (Dale): You realize, of course, that this means war.

Justice O'Connor has long been a centrist member of the court, providing innumerable swing votes in closely-held 5-4 decisions. With a more originalist jurist, all of those decisions are now up for grabs.

About the only judge on the shortlist for the Supreme Court who might come close to filling O'Connors role, in terms of likely decisions, is Michael McConnel. He's quite the originalist himself, but he has a lot of respect for precedent, too, and would presumably be less interested in revisiting some of the issues on which Ms. O'Connor has provided the swing vote. Any of the other shortlist jurists, however, like Luttig or Alito, gets us firmly into the Scalia-Thomas type of justice.

So, if you though the rancor over judicial nominations to the appellate bench was ugly, you ain't seen nothing yet. If Bush puts forward Michael Luttig as her replacement, the Democrats will go full goose loony in trying to prevent his appointment.

Frankly, I'm not sure what the results will be. It's one thing to object to judicial nominees when some obscure (in the public's mind) Circuit Appeals Bench is up for grabs. The Supreme Court, however, has a completely different level of visibility and public interest.

This has all the appearance of a looming train wreck: ugly, vicious, yet, too fascinating not to watch.

 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Possibly. But the Horserace Blogger reckons Bush might be wise to let this go through easily.
 
Written By: Kankean
URL: http://spaces.msn.com/members/kankean/

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider