Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
QandO has Moved
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Maybe we should reconsider that whole "universal sufferage" deal
Posted by: Dale Franks on Friday, October 15, 2004

Cathy Siepp writes in the Wall Street Journal that, just maybe, trying to get idiots to vote is a waste of time.
"I am not disengaged, I'm worn out," a Michigan State University senior named Traci E. Carpenter wrote in a Newsweek essay explaining why she and her peers are "not necessarily available Nov. 2." Traci had won a contest for college journalists sponsored by Newsweek and MTV's college channel, MTVU. MTV also sponsors the Choose or Lose youth-vote campaign; thus the topic of the winning essay.

"Sometimes I feel that no matter how I vote, there will still be war, crime and poverty," Traci continued in what read like a dead-on parody of adolescent cluelessness and self-absorption, except she wasn't kidding. "And I have other things on my mind. I am worried about skin cancer, drunken drivers, eating disorders . . ."

I saw the dimmest minds of Traci Carpenter's generation, destroyed by watching too much MTV, nodding their heads and thinking: "Dude, like, I know! They tell us to vote, but when we do, it still doesn't stop war and skin cancer and eating disorders. That's so totally harsh!"
Here's some advice, on 2 Nov, just relax, and take a few more hits off that bong.

If you are too apathetic to inform yourself about the issues, then why, precisely, is it that we want you voting, anyway? Aren't those of us who do think about this stuff better off if you just stay home, and watch Oprah while us adults go about the business of selecting a government? I mean, we don't expect you pop round to local trauma center and give the Med/Surg staff tips on Neurosurgery, so why do we expect you to vote on things about which you are similarly clueless?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
This was a college journalist? A senior? And she's bothered because "no matter how she votes there will always be war!?!?

Wake the f*ck up already!

Who the hell told her that this was U-freakin'-topia?

My God, how incredibly mind-numbingly ignorant.
 
Written By: W
URL: http://
and how incredibly, mind-numbingly, self absorbed and sheltered.

Insanity - "my vote doesn't make war go away, so why vote? Besides, I'm busy worrying about drunk drivers and eating disorders".

It tells you how many troubles she has in her life if she's got time to be agonizing over drunk drivers and eating disorders.

Good, she shouldn't vote, but I do want her to show up at the voting booth and sign the new form I'm demanding the government implement that says "I didn't vote this time around, so I promise under penalty of severe monetary fine that I will not bitch about the President, or his policies, for the next 4 years".
 
Written By: looker
URL: http://
Corbett, well, that's one way of looking at things.

But over what time frame do you expect these dire things to happen? And do consider the war to be an important thing or just, you know, a nuisance?

Which candidate is more likely to appoint Supreme Court Justices who respect the Constitution?
 
Written By: Bostonian
URL: http://
Corbett, I can't say I disagree with your assessment.

But Ms. Carpenter seems to not want to vote - not because the candidates aren't acceptable (by rational measure) - but because... well, because no candidate is Santa Claus.
 
Written By: W
URL: http://
W,

My problem is that the politicians believe they ARE Santa Claus.
 
Written By: Corbett
URL: http://
Unconstitutional war? BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

Congress gave the go-ahead, the President went.
That's all the Constitution requires. Have a nice day.

Armed populace - Bwhahahahahaah - yeah that's a sure stopper for a suitcase bomb or a fuel laden L10-11.
(and I'm for citizens owning weapons).

terrorists - tell ya what Corbie, let's send your address to Al-Queda and ask them to drop an jetliner specifcally your house, first, and we'll see if you still want to talk about how more people die on US highways every year than died on 9/11. Shouldn't be a problem, you'll be armed of course, and that'll stop em I'm sure.

And let's pretend the rest of the big bad world isn't there...yeah, that'll be entertaining and practical.

You're even more entertaining than MKUltra.

 
Written By: looker
URL: http://
"The ONLY reason that Saddam was our enemy is because we fought another war against Iraq when they hadn't attacked us. (And the only reason that Saddam attacked Kuwait to begin with is because our ambassador to Iraq gave him the green light.) Hell, Saddam was our ally."

Could we please stop using 15 year old bogus assertions in our arguments?

"Who do you think supplied all those chemical weapons that he used on the Iranians? "

Almost exclusively France and the USSR.
 
Written By: Lance Jonn Romanoff
URL: http://www.ljonn.com/
W,

My problem is that the politicians believe they ARE Santa Claus.
And they always will be as long as they control the taxing authority and the subsequent disbursement of the funds. Its much easier to buy your way into power, and its a much more sure way of maintaining it. The culture in America, for whatever reason, has changed from saying to government, `stay the hell out of my life`, to "what can you get for me". As long as that culture persists, Santa Claus is going to be much more popular, in terms of how the government is viewed, than the guys who prefer to be nighwatchmen and protect lives, liberty and property.
 
Written By: McQ
URL: Unknown

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider