She tells Ross that she had no journalistic obligation to prove the authenticity of the documents before including them in the "60 Minutes II" report. "I don’t think that’s the standard," she said.
Neither did the editors who allowed the claims of that fake Marine to go unchallenged....see a pattern here? |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
Just like a scientist promulgating a new theory or a prosecutor charging a defendent, the person making the case (or others supporting that theory) needs to prove it for it to be accepted. A theory is false until proven true, a defendent innocent until proven guilty. Her documents needed to be considered suspect until proven authentic. She assumed authenticity and demands others to prove her conclusively wrong. That is simply not how it is done in any field of endeavor. |
| |
Written By:
Kevin
URL:
http://
|
I have been to the moon. And Mars. And Saturn. and I was visited by little green men from outer space who want to all live in peaceful socialist coexistence.
Go ahead and prove me wrong. Noone has been able to prove that these things didnt happen.
Sorry but I have to go and get back to running Planet Earth. I am the supreme high commander after all. Go ahead and prove that I am not.
|
| |
Written By:
retired military
URL:
http://
|
|
Dont mean to be insulting, but Why in the flip should I care what mary Mapes thinks? |
| |
Written By:
Kyle N
URL:
http://
|
Dont mean to be insulting, but Why in the flip should I care what mary Mapes thinks?
It’s instructive, Kyle ... very instructive, and indicative of the serious problems to be found within the MSM. Remember how she thinks the next time you watch something ... and understand, there are people within that profession that agree with her. |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/
|
“She assumed …[the liberal talking points] … and demands others to prove her conclusively wrong.” Hmmmm, Kevin, there is a lot that going on around here.
|
| |
Written By:
notherbob2
URL:
http://
|
Interestingly, however, that is how it’s done in the study of Evolution Theory these days.
However, that’s a digression from the topic at hand. |
| |
Written By:
Nathan
URL:
http://brain.mu.nu/
|
|
Nathan, tell that to the people in Dover, PA. Have you read any of the current court proceedings? You can keep holding on to your faith in what the proponents of creationism have admitted is not scientific under oath, but creationism will never be taught legally in American science classrooms. As far as your belief that evolution is not scientific, I guess you think there must be a grand conspiracy by thousands of scientists and teachers to fool people all over the world since they claim evolution is scientific. Either that or they are so incredibly stupid that they don’t really understand science at all. Which is it? |
| |
Written By:
JWG
URL:
http://
|
|
If she doesn’t think that she needs to prove the memos authentic, then could she at least provide a scintilla of evidence of authenticity? It appears she believes that the evidence of authenticity is that the documents contain some information that "meshes" with known facts about Bush’s National Guard record. But the information that meshed was all part of the public domain. So the meshing evidence does not rule out a fake produced by a reasonably informed forger. Outside of the so-callled meshing analysis, is there any evidence of authenticity? |
| |
Written By:
Paul
URL:
http://
|