Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The Chinese Economic Miracle?
Posted by: Jon Henke on Friday, February 03, 2006

Stratfor has a fascinating analysis of the incredible growth that China has experienced in recent years. [alt: free link] China's remarkable growth, Stratfor argues, has not been entirely real. What's more...
Western markets have been at least subconsciously aware of this for a decade. More than half of the $1.1 trillion in foreign direct investment that has flowed into China since 1995 has not been foreign at all, but money recirculated through tax havens by various local businessmen and governing officials looking to avoid taxation. Of the remainder, Western investment into China has remained startlingly constant at about $7 billion annually. Only Asian investors whose systems are often plagued (like Japan's) by similar problems of profitability or (like Indonesia's) outright collapse have been increasing their exposure in China.

The Chinese capital market, in short, has been the beneficiary of onerous tax policies, as well as a generally weak Asian investment market. Their growth, however, "does not equal health". China may have capital, but it remains in many ways a command economy, with the concomitant "inability to allocate capital efficiently".

As Stratfor describes the long-standing Chinese model...


But in an increasingly connected world economy, can China keep this up? Not without sacrificing their position in the global economy. So, China is making an effort to reform, including some financial sector rehabilitation and increased transparency to encourage foreign investment.

Of course, from our perspective, this is a healthy development, too. After all, increased connectivity means increased co-depencence, increased leverage and decreased chance of a destabilizing Chinese foreign policy. The more diverse the vested interests, the less likely China will be to take risks.

Still, Stratfor wonders, what of the "existence of a few hundred billion dollars in dud loans — linked to tens of thousands of dud firms for which the central government is now directly responsible"? Both apparent Chinese solutions retain strong components of the command economy. They may forestall social turmoil, but they do not necessarily constitute sustainable, long-term wealth creation. At some point, the inherent contradictions and paper tigers in the Chinese system will collapse. Though, with what effect, we can't tell yet.

In the meantime — and since China's domestic financial policies are largely out of our hands — I think this is all the more reason to support even the limited entry of Google into China. As Michael Stickings at The Reaction notes, "Google's censored presence in China may yet be the thin end of a wedge that is essential to opening up China to alternatives to its brutal totalitarianism". If major changes are coming, we'll be much better off if the Chinese understand and identify with the Western world to some extent.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Stratfor touches a nerve.

If Enron, Global Crossing or the Arthur Anderson accounting scandals were "economic disasters," then what should we call the opaque accounting rules, government intervention in the economy, and monopoly CCP leadership of China, Inc.?

If Clinton’s boom was a "bubble," I wonder just how much "air" is in the Chinese economy. And how far back should I stand to be safe when it pops?
Written By: Steve
URL: http://
Asian investment in China will of course exceed Western investment. Say you owned a factory in Taiwan that exported for many years to America...of course you see the value of moving to China and recreating your glory years of cheap labor and big volumes.

US manufacturing firms might invest in China, but those that are left from the previous migrations of factories to HK/Taiwan/Korea are in high volume consumer goods (toothpaste) or high tech and mainly looking at the local or regional market. The US importer of textiles, toys, or TV’s won’t be investing in a China factory.

Same with real estate, where Taiwanese who experienced a similar boom economy in a similar culture know what to invest in and with greater gusto.

Yep, a lot of the money is being recirculated to get better tax deals. Or even to be allowed to import product under preferential deals.

Yep, a lot of loans have been made to a staggering number of local people to open massive factories on the "if you build it, they will come" philosophy. That’s gotta hit a wall eventually.

In the meantime enjoy your "China price" products.
Written By: Harun
URL: http://
But without some fairly severe adjustments, this shift would swiftly suck the capital out of the Chinese banking system. After all, if you are a Chinese depositor, who would you put your money with — a foreign bank offering 2 percent interest and a passbook that means something, or a local state bank that can (probably) be counted on to give your money back (without interest)?
The banks don’t have the peoples money, they have loaned it out and the loans are not being paid off and wont be paid off. When people go to the bank to withdrawal money and the money is not there, the word spreads, you get a run on the banks and the start of a good old fashion financial panic.

No economy in the world has ever industrialized without going through multiple recessions/depressions/panics. It is not a question of if but when and how the China bubble will pop. Large numbers of newly unemployed people who have recently moved from the country to the city are going to cause a real political crisis. To avoid this, my guess is that China will recapitalize the state run banks by printing money. Not sure what that will look like. Massive inflation? Or will China sell off all those US government bonds they are holding to recapitalize the banks?
Written By: Lighthouse
URL: http://
I think Lighthouse nailed it. Looking at a chart of Chinese GDP growth rates, the trend stabilizes between roughly 7% and 9% beginning in 1997. Prior to that, it had the tendency to swing wildly from 15% to 4% and back to 15%. Either the government has figured out how to manage the economy quite consistently or there’s something else going on. I’m not a big believer in conspiracy theories, but I wouldn’t put much money in the MSCI China index personally.
Written By: Tom
URL: http://
Is anybody really surprised that the statistics from the Chinese government are, shall we say, somewhat more favourable than one would expect from a tyrannical and corrupt socialist paradise? Please.
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
I am sure these statistics have been verified by the same people who analyzed the former Soviet Union’s economic condition and overrated it.
Written By: timactual
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks