Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Al-Qaeda’s strategy and struggles
Posted by: mcq on Thursday, February 16, 2006

Documents released by Special Operations Command through West Point's Combating Terrorism Center reveal some of the struggles of post 9/11 al-Qaeda. Also revealed is the strategic goal, or "end game" for al-Queda:
The documents show al-Qaeda is committed to waging a holy war against "dictators of the Earth and secular groups" that will end only when "everyone believes in Allah."
Well, there you go. And of course, that means "by any means necessary". It also means that those who refuse to "believe" will be summarily killed. Fairly simple, fairly straight forward, and something which should remove all doubt as to what the west faces in the WoT.

Al-Qaeda also has minimum requirements for being a terrorist training camp supervisor:
An al-Qaeda planning document that lays out the structure of the organization says the qualifications for being a supervisor at a terrorist training camp include two years of service in a jihadi struggle, a high school degree, some scientific and military knowledge and "sobriety."
Of course the latter requirement leaves me out, but resumes are being accepted. Interestingly it fits much of our military. I guess the "Allah" thing is optional? Just kidding.

If you think the Bush White House has a PR problem, they're not alone:
Many documents show al-Qaeda leaders discussing the need for a successful public relations strategy. In June 2000, an operative named Abu Huthaifa writes a mentor that al-Qaeda needs to fix problems in its "informational and political efforts," failings that are "killers of the movement."
Yeah, they haven't found a successful way to make car bombing other muslims a "positive" thus far. Go figure.

Last, but not least, leadership, and especially Osama bin Laden, comes in for some criticism:
Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is also criticized in some documents. One letter by operative Abd-al-Halim Adl in June 2002 challenges bin Laden's leadership and blames him for the "misfortune and disaster" brought on by post-9/11 U.S. military actions.

Adl asks the recipient, identified only as Mukhtar, to urge bin Laden to change course and "stop all foreign actions, stop sending people to captivity, stop devising new operations."
In other words, "stop!" Adl's point seems to be "with leaders like this, who needs enemies".

An interesting peek inside the world's foremost terror organization. But with all the difficulties and set-backs, it's important to remember that a) they are the enemy, b) they declared war on us and c) their intent isn't to quit until we all "believe in Allah".

That brings us to d) they all need to be killed or captured. They're serious about their goals, and we need to be equally as serious about ours. We also need to remember we're at war (something which a certain segement of our population seems more than willing to conveniently forget if there's political gains to be made by doing so), it's going to be a long war and winning depends on our willingness to see it through. Patience is not one of our virtues as a nation, but it is one which is critical to winning this war.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Good post. Two points, however:

1. We need to drop the term "War on Terror." It is an Orwellian term that is ultimately meaningless. War cannot be waged against an abstract noun, whether it be Drugs, Poverty, Injustice, etc. War can only be waged against a group of people, and in this case, as you correctly point out, it is al-Qaeda. Words matter.

2. This may very well be a long war, but once the perpetuators of 9/11 have been caught or killed, this war will be over, as per the AUMF:

"the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."

Otherwise Congress will need to declare a new one.
 
Written By: cllam
URL: http://
or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons."
Read the res... and tell me it’ll be over when they’re caught. "They" is very broadly defined.
 
Written By: Joe
URL: http://
Remember this Blog Posting.
 
Written By: newc
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider