Wow.
As for that sexual harassment thing:Remember, nothing says ’good job’ like a firm, open-palm slap on the behind. - Family Guy |
| |
Written By:
OrneryWP
URL:
http://
|
I heard a pundit on the radio talk about Honor Based societies vs. Right & Wrong Based societies. For example, pre-WWII Japan followed its Emperor into war because its honorable to follow the Emporer and serve the nation. Whether the war was right or wrong didn’t matter. The discussion laid the groundwork for a contrast between Western nations and Islamic nations. The furor over the cartoons is because the honor of Mohammad and Islam has been insulted. A measured response doesn’t matter since their honor has been impuned. This is why in some areas of the Middle East fathers will kill their daughters if they’ve been caught having premarrital sex. Honor supercedes Right & Wrong. And by honor, I mean it more in the pride/status sense.
I think Honor based society was in effect in the West up until the Renaissance where we only began to move away from it. Galileo & the scientific method showed that we started to care more about "just the facts" and less about the popular beliefs of society. To me Right & Wrong is based on the facts while Honor is based on emotion.
The Honor vs. Right & Wrong thing explains why we’ve stopped having religious "Crusades" while Islam seems still interested in expanding. Many of the fault attributed to Christianity in the West’s history really belong to the culture. If it wasn’t Christianity, it would be the King’s honor.
Anyway, I’ve been applying this concept to understand why behavior differs in our part of the world. And by far the West isn’t completely free of the "honor" thing. However it seems the further East you go, the greater the "honor" component seems to play in a society.
Looking at this case specifically we see that since the girl’s honor is not of adequate standing, the acts against her are not considered as grave. |
| |
Written By:
John
URL:
http://
|
|
Oral sex is rape? |
| |
Written By:
The Owner’s Manual
URL:
http://gcruse.typepad.com
|
Well, oral sex is forcible sodomy, which is more or less equivalent to rape most of the time.
I agree ’in theory’ that the damage to the victim is less if he/she is not a virgin. However, the crime itself is the same. I’m not sure about Italian law, but in the US, criminal law is supposed to be based on the crime, not its negative effects. The theory is that breaking the law harms the state, hence "The State of Texas v. Tom, Dick and Harry." Mitigating factors are things that affect the perpetrator, not the victim. |
| |
Written By:
Effeminem
URL:
http://ethermind.blogspot.com
|
I wonder would the discussion work the same if she had crept in the next night and "sodomized" him with a Genoa salami. Would he consider that a lesser crime? because, after all, he’s not a virgin ya know.
And I suppose if ya buy the Clintonian argument that oral sex isn’t intercourse, I guess it’s not "rape" either....ahhhh, the wonders of nuance in language and how it’s used to rape human dignity in a legal fashion.
|
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Zex Drugs un ROCKY Road c r e d i t b y m i l a n . c o m wfhm.com/milan-thakkar
m i l a n . t h a k k a r @ g m a i l . c o m |
| |
Written By:
Marco Hraksem
URL:
http://creditbymilan.com
|