McQ, our blog the other day to an NPR story (here) in which Adam Davidson notes that none of the senators with whom he spoke were able to put him in contact with a single port security expert who backed their position. Not one. If you haven’t heard it, I think it is worth a listen.
We all know that port security is not as tight as it could be, but that is totally separate and apparently unaffected by whether or not this deal goes through. The posturing and rationalizing and the straw-grasping has been an embarrassment - it is pseudo-isolationism and, as you say, Islamophobia. The USCG memo was a dead end. The boycott of Israel is a dead end. None of these things materialize into a legitimate reason for stopping the deal. The only thing that seems to have been a real issue is whether the deal needed 30 days or 45 days of people noting that it is not a threat to national security. |
| |
Written By:
Wulf
URL:
http://www.atlasblogged.com
|
|
I object to playing “the race card” regardless of the facts. Even if one is convinced that the port deal is kosher, that is not a good enough reason to see opponents as driven by base motives. The debate has degenerated into what I call bigotry baiting. And this only harms a calm rational discussion. Let’s leave out suspicions of other’s intensions and deal with the merits of the issue. People can honestly disagree and on this issue one finds strange bedfellows, indeed. |
| |
Written By:
Jason Pappas
URL:
http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com
|
|
Actually, it’s more "Bushophobia" where Democrats see a chance to score points against the administration even if they have to act like ignorant hypocrites, and where Republicans suddenly get scared and also run away... |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
By the way, Hillary needs to STFU, since Chinese-owned companies had a real sweet ride in this area when her hubby was in office... |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|