Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Iran: Carrots and sticks
Posted by: McQ on Monday, March 06, 2006

If you listen to John Bolton, all the carrots are being left to the EU-3. Bolton, in a series of statements, is making it clear that a military response to Iran's nuclear intransigence is not off the table:
The US ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, has told British MPs that military action could bring Iran's nuclear programme to a halt if all diplomatic efforts fail. The warning came ahead of a meeting today of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which will forward a report on Iran's nuclear activities to the UN security council.
Today's IAEA will end the month of grace to find a diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear question and report Iran to the Security Council of the UN. Although it may be difficult to pass, the SC could impose sanctions on Iran. That, as mentioned, doesn't mean a military option doesn't still exist. Bolton addressed that point to a British parliamentary delegation recently:
According to Eric Illsley, a Labour committee member, the envoy told the MPs: "They must know everything is on the table and they must understand what that means. We can hit different points along the line. You only have to take out one part of their nuclear operation to take the whole thing down."

It is unusual for an administration official to go into detail about possible military action against Iran. To produce significant amounts of enriched uranium, Iran would have to set up a self-sustaining cycle of processes. Mr Bolton appeared to be suggesting that cycle could be hit at its most vulnerable point.
Sounds simple, but it wouldn't be as simple as taking out a part, especially if Iran has built redundant systems. However, given Iran's bad faith negotiations, the military option, regardless of its viability, must remain on the table. Bolton does make a good point though: you don't have to take all of the facilites out to cripple the program if, and that's a big "if", you have good intelligence about the sites of particularly key elements in that program.
Some believe Iran has secret facilities that are buried so deep underground as to be impenetrable. They argue that the US could never be certain whether or not it had destroyed Iran's "capability".
Which brought me back to a remembrance of the Bush administration's desire to continue to develop nuclear bunker busters and the critics saying they were "dangerous, ineffective and unneeded". That would be irony, eh? Stop a nuclear program with a nuclear weapon?

UPDATE: What Bolton wants the Security Council to pass is a "Chapter 7" resolution.
He told the MPs that he wanted a “Chapter 7 resolution” under which the UN would authorise military action, such as air strikes, against Iran.
In the UN, a Chapter 7 resolution is more serious than a Chapter 5 resolution. Under Chapter 7, action to include military action, can be authorized. It would be similar to UNSC 687 against Iraq.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

In the UN, a Chapter 7 resolution is more serious than a Chapter 5 resolution.
If the UN was really serious, they’d make it go up to 11.
[/spinal tap]
Written By: JWG
URL: http://

That is the most bankrupt argument I have seen yet...
Written By: D
URL: http://
Argggggggghhhh! ;)
Written By: McQ
hi dear
i am student of university from iran. i interest subjects politic. i help to award people iranian about ambition nuke of regime mullah.
Written By: Pouya Arjmand

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks