Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Media reports makes up New Foreign Policy
Posted by: Jon Henke on Saturday, April 01, 2006

I'm confused about how, exactly, this could work:
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the U.S. will no longer give explicit support to governments that are not elected, suggesting that spreading democracy now takes priority over maintaining political stability.

``The past 60 years of trying to buy stability at the expense of democracy is now gone,'' Rice said at a press conference in Blackburn, England, that was televised by the British Broadcasting Corp. The policy was one of ``Middle East exceptionalism,'' she said.
I guess it comes down to what "explicit support" means. Obviously, we won't be cutting of China's Most Favored Nation trade status. I mean, we're big fans of democracy, but we're not fanatics about it.

But beyond that, how could we quit giving "explicit support" without serious repercussions? Does this mean we end our mutually beneficial cooperative relationship with the military dictatorship of Pakistan? If we give "explicit support" to Taiwan, will that constitute formal recognition of Taiwanese independence? Will we abjure future intervention on behalf of invaded countries like Kuwait? Of course, those questions all assume the reporter reported accurately. What if he didn't?

Divider


The whole thing sounds a bit too stark — too black and white — for foreign policy, so I looked for the transcript. Oddly, while Secretary Rice does make some remarks about democracy and changes in US foreign policy...
But I would say that probably the most important thing that we've done is to declare for the past 60 years of American policy that in the Middle East, the heart of the problem that we currently face, that the 60 years of trying to buy stability at the expense of democracy is now gone. There was a kind of Middle East exceptionalism in American policy and that policy was both because we were so concerned about stability ... And that premise has been proved wrong time and time again throughout the world ... And so that is the policy change that I would hope would be somehow acknowledged by Muslims, even if they don't agree.
The word "explicit" is never used, and the only mention of "support" comes when Secretary Rice says that people "ought to be supported in that desire for democracy". Nowhere in the transcript can I find support for Bloomberg's "the U.S. will no longer give explicit support to governments that are not elected". Very odd.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Jon - I had this same reaction, but kind of in reverse, in that I found the media piece (and your posting here) after reading the actual transcript while researching a blog post. I thought sheesh, I must have missed this and what the heck does it mean??

IMHO this is another example of what you get with an open-loop, wholly unaccountable press. They have gotten so comfortable reworking and, for the most part, misrepresenting current events that they don’t think twice about (and their editors are oblivious to) changing the story to fit the leftist narrative.

I guess that would explain stuff like this, but while that process takes the time to reach its ultimate conclusion, it’s sure taking it’s toll on the truth.

 
Written By: goy
URL: http://www.agoyandhisblog.com

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider