Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
E&P Editor: "Crisis almost without equal"
Posted by: McQ on Friday, April 21, 2006

Would someone get Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor & Publisher, a cold glass of something to drink? In an editorial ominously entitled "A Crisis Almost Without Equal" he says:
Our president, in a time of war, terrorism and nuclear intrigue, will likely remain in office for another 33 months, with crushingly low approval ratings that are still inching lower. Facing a similar problem, voters had a chance to quickly toss Jimmy Carter out of office, and did so. With a similar lengthy period left on his White House lease, Richard Nixon quit, facing impeachment. Neither outcome is at hand this time.
Good grief. You'd think that this was the lowest approval rating any president has had ever had.

Well sit back and relax Greg. If you want ratings in time of war, check out Nixon and Johnson. And, well, if you want ratings, at some time or another, lower than Bush's present rating, check out just about any past president at some time in his presidency:
Those ratings include Lyndon Johnson's 35%, Richard Nixon's 24%, Gerald Ford's 37%, Jimmy Carter's 28%, Ronald Reagan's 35%, the elder George Bush's 29% and Bill Clinton's 37%.
Bush has a higher rating than all but Clinton and Ford (and if you go with the RCP poll average, he has both by .1%)

Clinton left office with a 65% approval rating. Reagan with a 64%. Carter, otoh, only managed a 34%.

Look, "approval ratings" are simply the temperature of the public at a given time. And they can turn around on a dime. All this angst and ink about "low approval ratings" 7 months before an off-year election and 33 months before the next presidential election (in which, Greg, Bush isn't participating) is silly. And it's even sillier when you see a editor of a trade publication for, well, editors, having this sort of a crack up.

Chill out, Greg. Take a vacation. Do a little navel-gazing. When you get back tell me again how important that approval rating thing really is, in context this time, in the big scheme of things. And if you want to talk about it some more, let's do it when it actually may be important - like 33 months from now.

(HT: James Taranto)
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Taranto says:
"For journalists of a certain age, Vietnam and Watergate were triumphs that they are eager to repeat. It doesn’t look as though that’s going to happen. Our advice to newsmen? Pray. "Lord, grant me the courage to change what I can, the serenity to accept what I cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference."

Amen. Now stop crusading and report the damn news."
Oh Lordy, the King of Kerfuffle, Glenn Greenwald, will be on this like a bee on a honey, er, a bee on a honey. Anyway, he will take this as Revealed Truth and pump it up into the Crisis of the Century. Can’t wait to read it. Geez. The Angry Left is such an embarrassment. Oh well, it is better than reading his demagoguing about the scandal, that the NSA Scandal, wasn’t a scandal. Let me guess: "Unimaginable !! Crisis Without Equal - No "Almost" About It!". Ho-hum. Wonder what Neo-neocon has to say today?
 
Written By: Notherbob2
URL: http://
Don’t mean to hijack your thread; I am just riffing on your theme of crazies over-reacting to liberal media provocations. After my prediction above, I slipped over to Mr. Greenwald’s blog to see if he had fulfilled my expectations and I see him quoting Scott Ritter under the title of "Proven Wisdom" [!!]:
"We created the perception of a noncompliant Iraq, and we stuck with that perception, selling that perception until we achieved our ultimate objective, which was invasion that got rid of Saddam. With Iran, we are creating the perception of a noncompliant Iran, a threatening Iran. It doesn’t matter what the facts are."
Well, it seems to me that someone must believe that it doesn’t matter what the facts are if they are positing that Saddam’s noncompliance was a "created perception".
Wow. The stuff they can sell in the liberal cocoon.
Can’t wait for MK to avow that, indeed, there is a crisis. Why is the left so predictable?
 
Written By: Notherbob2
URL: http://
Crisis almost without equal

Oh, for a minute I thought he was talking about the media’s crisis- facing declining revenues, readerships, and public trust.
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
I’m with you, shark. I thought that magazine was supposed to be about the publishing industry. Talk about the log in their own eye...
 
Written By: Billy Hollis
URL: http://
Speaking about ratings...
Why don’t we establish ratings for everything?
As an Internet user you, probably, have already tried to find ratings on some things which you consider to buy, use or get more information on. It may be services (hosting, design or movie rentals), public figures, consumer goods, articles or books, news, movies, beer, hotels, websites and much more.
You have, perhaps, seen thousands of fragmented websites, discussion forums, which force you to dig for the information even more.
With Ratingo you got one-stop shop, where you can find what people think (and why) about all you have been searching for before.

ratingo.com
 
Written By: ratingo.com
URL: http://ratingo.com

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider