Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Political prostitution, Republican style
Posted by: McQ on Monday, May 01, 2006

I'm sure you've seen the Republican plan to send you $100 because gas prices have risen?

Look at this reasoning:
David Winston, a Republican pollster who advises the Senate Republican leadership, called the rebate an intuitive way to show voters that Republicans were on their side. "It is like putting the American family budget ahead of oil company profits," Mr. Winston said. "How do you help the American families out? Well, give them some money."
"Give them some money"!?

A) It is "their" money to begin with. So if you want to "give them some money" wouldn't it make more sense to cut gas taxes as the Democrats are suggesting?

B) Any guess as to what it costs to issue $100 checks to 100 million people? I can promise it costs much more than $100. So, picking a number out of the air, does it make sense to send $100 checks that cost $120 to write and send? Yeah, let's "give them some money" and let's also spend more of "their" money to do it.

This is overt pandering, so overt and so nonsensical that the public is outspoken in its rejection of the proposal:
Aides for several Republican senators reported a surge of calls and e-mail messages from constituents ridiculing the rebate as a paltry and transparent effort to pander to voters before the midterm elections in November.

"The conservatives think it is socialist bunk, and the liberals think it is conservative trickery," said Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, pointing out that the criticism was coming from across the ideological spectrum.

Angry constituents have asked, "Do you think we are prostitutes? Do you think you can buy us?" said another Republican senator's aide, who was granted anonymity to openly discuss the feedback because the senator had supported the plan.
In this scheme, it isn't the constituents that are the prostitutes. And someone, anyone, tell me again ... how are Congressional Republicans different than the Democrats?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
They’re on ’our side’. They’re ’our’ politicians.
hahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaha.

Sorta reminds me of the cold war.
 
Written By: looker
URL: http://
What? Democrats (in Congress) are suggesting lowering gas taxes while Republicans are suggesting a direct buy-off? (Of course, them being Senate Republicans makes THAT less of a surprise)

Alright, who forgot to let us know that the thermometer for Hades just froze solid?
 
Written By: Dave
URL: http://
how are Congressional Republicans different than the Democrats?

They wear bigger hats and smaller ties.
 
Written By: Unaha-closp
URL: http://
I am a Republican, and this whole "$100" thing makes me puke.

However, there are a number of differences between Republicans and Democrats, namely:

1. Republicans want you to have your tax money back so you can spend it on things you like, while Dems want your tax money raised so they can spend on things they like.

2. Republicans stand for hard work; Democrats stand for working, but not too hard or you may become one of those bad rich people.

3. Republicans love capitalism; Democrats want capitalism but are happy to allow socialism.

4. Republicans have Rudy Guiliani; Dems have Ted Kennedy and Harry Reid.

5. Republicans are for everyone to be equally happy; Democrats are for everyone to be equally miserable.

Any more?

Alexander Alt
 
Written By: Alexander Alt
URL: http://
Yeah, Alexander, I’m interested in the list that convinces me that Republicans don’t spend like Democrats.

Start with how they didn’t vote for Medicare Part D, OK?
 
Written By: McQ
URL: http://www.qando.net/blog
I don’t particulary mind that they are trying to buy my vote, I rather expect it of politicians, but to do it so cheaply is insulting.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider