Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
An Inconvenient Question for Al Gore
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, May 25, 2006

Samuel Thernstrom asks it:
In the meantime there is one technology that could dramatically reduce America’s greenhouse-gas emissions—and yet environmentalists are fervently opposed to it. Al Gore doubts it has much potential. But the only cost-effective way we know right now to produce thousands of megawatts of zero-emissions electricity is nuclear power. America, of course, hasn’t built a new nuclear plant since Three Mile Island, but that’s going to change. Just how many plants are built, and how quickly, will depend in part on how fierce the environmental opposition is. Will Al Gore lead the way?
If it is all about greenhouse gasses, Al, how about it?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I remember a Kristof editorial last year with the perfect title: "Nukes are Green." Anyone who calls themselves an environmentalist *should* be in support of nuclear power, and it is unfortunate that it has been met with resistance.
 
Written By: Kinsey
URL: http://www.vaprogressive.com
While the current age of the plants (Average=35 years) puts them in their max lifetimes (60 years) and a 10 year construction timeline might lead someone to think we’ve got 5 years left to mess around, the 10 year average construction time is from breaking ground, not the start of the eco protests.

Oh, and the last wave of plants to make grid connections was in the mid to late 1980’s (Yes, there’s that one outlier in 1996). All the people who managed those projects and have the experience to build a commercial reactor are nearing or in retirement. Sure, we could build them again with no help, but waiting and losing that knowledge would be a waste.

Or we can just sit and hope we can master controlled fusion.
 
Written By: Anonymous
URL: http://
I remember that the same luddits who are behind Al Gore, were the same people back in the 1970’s who did all they could to kill the domestic nuclear industry. They had rock concerts (No Nukes) and stupid movies (The China Syndrome) full of fearmongering and crock science. Just like today.
 
Written By: kyle N
URL: http://impudent.blognation.us/blog
So we outsource the building of nuclear power plants to any of the multi-national companies who have vast experience doing it.

There, problem solved.

Now, what to do with the watermelons...
 
Written By: Keith, Indy
URL: http://
With respect to the costs (read "subsidies") of constructing and operating a nuclear power plant, I’ve seen the "fact" asserted that nuclear power is much more expensive than any other form of power. I have no idea if this is true or not, and I’m wondering if anyone here has reliable data (pro or con) regarding the issue. Thoughts?
 
Written By: MichaelW
URL: http://
I’ve seen the "fact" asserted that nuclear power is much more expensive than any other form of power
I’d have to question that. Even if it were true, how much of the "costs" come from legal delays and lawsuits by the "No to power" crowd? The utilities make money on the plants operation, the plants pay into a trust fund to cover waste disposal (Current estimate has that trust fund containing 100 years of operating costs for Yucca when it opens), they establish and fund a trust fund to pay for decomissioning of the plant. (Maine Yankee’s shutdown seems to be showing that trust fund is funded properly.)

This sounds very similar to the arguent that capital punishment is more expensive than life sentances. Only true because the same people agitating against the death penality on a cost basis are doing everything they can to drive the costs up.
 
Written By: Anonymous
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider