It’s liberals like Al Gore that make me glad I became a conservative.
He can blame trying to not count absentee ballots from me and others Soldiers in Germany for that.
I find these constant personal attacks many keep spitting at Bush cheap and not helping them for election 2008 ... but if they stop they might really hurt the country and get us someone like Hillary in office.
|
| |
Written By:
RickyB
URL:
http://
|
The Price-Anderson Act is a federal bailout for the nuclear industry. If the industry wants to build plants and accepts finantial responsibility for getting rid of the waste, and cleaning up the sites in 50 years when the plants are obsolete, then fine, let the private sector build them.
What is wrong is for the US government to accept all the liabilty. If free markets are to rule lets get rid of all of our energy subsidies and let the market rule. Lets just be sure that all the costs are counted during the production of energy. That includes the costs of wastes, security and insurance.
|
| |
Written By:
cindy bravo
URL:
http://
|
P-A is about insurance and limited liability.
I have no problem having the Nuke industry doing all of what you’d like to see. I’d also say they they should then be allowed to charge what they want to for the power. I.e. no regulation of the price of their energy.
Fair enough? |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
cindy b, fine, if the protesters quit running up the bill for building a nuke plant by fighting it every step of the way. Last I recall, about 1/4 to 1/3 of the cost of building a nuke was legal fees spent fending off idiots like you.
As for nuclear waste, I have a foolproof plan for taking care of that. (Well, it’s foolproof in the sense that the fools pay for their own foolishness.)
First, separate ’nuclear’ or radioactive waste derived from things like taking X-rays from the hot waste from nuke plants. Then, mix the hot waste at a ratio of 100-1 in a heavy glass. Let cool.
Cut the radioactive waste/glass into blocks 12 feet on a side. Load and ship to an isolated desert or wasteland. Pile up blocks.
Put signs at appropriate distances: WARNING!! Hazardous nuclear waste ahead. Stay away. at, say 1000 yards.
Followed by: Hey! Stupid!! The dangerous nuclear waste is just ahead and if you get much closer you’ll get sick or die. Maybe at 500 yards.
Then: HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU? At this point you’re already heavily dosed and should seek medical attention. If you can crawl out, maybe we’ll get you some. If not, too bad. At an appropriate distance.
Then SO LONG SUCKER!! You’re dead. We sincerely hope you didn’t have any kids that you might have passed the stupidity gene to.
The glass would make it all but impossible to get any useful radioactives out (for, say a dirty bomb) even if you used really good hazard suits and a big, big truck and lead containment vessel. We could look out for those.
Anyway, no problem with storing waste. |
| |
Written By:
JorgXMcKie
URL:
http://
|
Al Gore has made his sharpest attack yet on the George Bush presidency, describing the current US administration as "a renegade band of rightwing extremists". I wouldn’t call that a "sharp" attack. "Blunt" is more like it. |
| |
Written By:
equitus
URL:
http://
|
"Blunt" is more like it. Perhaps Gore should sit down with a "blunt" to calm his nerves... |
| |
Written By:
b-psycho
URL:
http://www.psychopolitik.com
|
If the industry wants to build plants and accepts finantial responsibility for getting rid of the waste, and cleaning up the sites in 50 years when the plants are obsolete, then fine, let the private sector build them. That would be the current model. Glad you like it. Lets just be sure that all the costs are counted during the production of energy. That includes the costs of wastes, security and insurance. And how about some looser pays tort reform? The large cost the government is willing to soak up is the delays caused by the "No energy" crowd. |
| |
Written By:
Ryan
URL:
http://
|
I have heard Gore holds up China as having better emission standards than the United States. This is a joke.
China is an environmental disaster and it is not because of its laws. It is because of the lack of enforcement of the laws. China’s care emission laws may be better than the United States’, but that is basically irrelevant because there are a huge number of cars there whose emissions would probably not meet anyone’s standards. |
| |
Written By:
China Law Blog
URL:
http://www.chinalawblog.com
|