Trustworthy media - hmmmmm, like, um, Dan Rather and CBS?
In any event, good to highlight it, though I’m sure the usual suspects will attribute this to nothing more than PR. There’s nothing you can say, or do, to convince them that the military is made up of people who could be (and may be) their friends, neighbors and relatives. Somehow they act as if we have a special pool of people that we draw from (Jenghis Khan gene pool) for our volunteer forces. |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Have they been charged??. "Once charged, defendants have the right to an Article 32 hearing, the military equivalent of a grand jury investigation". "Once charged" makes it sound like they havn’t been charged yet.
Here is the entire article I read. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Iraq-Soldiers-Charged.html?_r=2&oref=login&oref=slogin |
| |
Written By:
markm
URL:
http://
|
markm said:Once charged" makes it sound like they havn’t been charged yet. I think what they mean is it has passed from the investigation phase to the article 32 phase. McQ: the same thought passed through my mind when I read it. Thanks for highlighting it. |
| |
Written By:
tom scott
URL:
http://
|
|
Well it helps that the soldier who reported had the last name of MURTHA, that’s the only reason that the Army investigated...otherwise it would have taken Seymour Hersh and/or Mary Mapes to bring this to light! |
| |
Written By:
Joe
URL:
http://
|