But, in all honesty, if we all weren’t so damn touchy and sensitive anymore, this actually would have gotten a rim shot instead of derision and outrage: Hey, the Dems should hold to the standard they demand the GOP follow. Didn’t Teddy and Reid and Schumer try to destroy the racist John Roberts for calling someone "Amigo"? |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
But does his comment even make sense? You have to have an Indian accent to go into a 7-11? Perhaps he meant to say ".. in order to work at" or "... in order to own"... still a tad improper, PC wise, but at least I would have understood what he was saying. It’s typical Biden: blow the White House over something trivial. And he’s among the best and the brightest the Democrats have to offer? |
| |
Written By:
steve sturm
URL:
http://thoughtsonline.blogspot.com/
|
Steve Sturm:Perhaps he meant to say ".. in order to work at" or "... in order to own"... still a tad improper, PC wise, but at least I would have understood what he was saying. You’ve hit on what bothers me about Biden.
I think Biden didn’t say "in order to work at" because then he would have committed himself to a racial stereotype of one kind of employee in America. Kinda like saying "The only kind of job an Indian can get is at a thrift store."
Biden was smart enough to see where his toungue was about to take him, so he swerved last minute, and limited his ethnic caricature to a "consumer-group". Safer ground.
He’s a slick operator! Jeff Goldstein could have a field-day with Biden this week (if he wasn’t under a prolonged DOS attack). Discovering that he was about to contravene PC-orthodoxy on tape, Biden attempted to conceal the frivolous "intention" that he had begun to express under a clumsy mis-wording.
Then he lazily leaves it up to his "interpreters" to glean fumbled intent from his drivel.
I’m with McQ. It’s largely harmless. But...it tells me a lot about Biden’s dodgy, frivolous-with-words character. -Steve
|
| |
Written By:
steve
URL:
http://
|