Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The 1st Law of Politics: Perception is Reality
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, July 13, 2006

At least to voters. And as Lois Romano notes in the Washington Post today, Hillary Clinton is confronting that law as she "unofficially" positions herself for a run for the presidency in '08.

The perception she's fighting?
"I think she's a little hard," she said. "She may be strong, but at the same time, if you're driven sometimes you're perceived as not having sympathy. And perception is reality for most of us."
As Romano says, Clinton's assets are major. But she also notes that while her assets are formidable, difficult liabilities remain which have to be addressed and, at least, neutered if Clinton is to stand a chance in a national race:
Beneath these positives, however, there is evidence of unease — about her personal history, demeanor and motives — among the very Democratic and independent voters she would need to win the presidency.
You don't have read through the blogosphere long to find hit pieces on Clinton, from both the left and the right. For many on the left, she suffers from a "Lieberman problem", her support for the war. For the right, well, the reasons are legion. And that is why, when you look at poll numbers measuring positives and negatives, they end up, percentage wise, fairly even.

But her battle for votes is to be found on the left and in the center. And, at the moment, those numbers, while giving her good marks also are discouraging because of the "perception" thing:
A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll highlighted the paradox. Fifty-four percent of those responding view her favorably, and a significant majority give her high marks for leadership (68 percent), strong family values (65 percent), and being open and friendly (58 percent). At the same time, only 37 percent of Democrats in the poll say they would definitely vote for her for president.

A Gallup poll from last summer also highlighted a perception that she is too divisive, with 53 percent of respondents saying they do not view her as someone who would "unite the country and not divide it."

Follow-up interviews with skeptical Democrats and independents who participated in the Post-ABC News poll suggest that many view her as an inscrutable public figure who gets high marks for her ability and intellect but who nonetheless gives them pause because they find it difficult to relate to her on a personal level.
This is her Achilles heel. Unlike her husband, Clinton doesn't do well relationally with voters. The perception they share of her aloofness and coolness isn't new. It has been the public Hillary Clinton since she first burst on the national scene during Bill's run for the presidency. And she's done little, to this point, to change that perception.
"The reason I am not able to say I am strongly supportive of her is because — and this is just vibes — she does not project a sense of what is inside of her like her husband did," said Sam Hack, 59, a self-described liberal Democrat from St. Louis.

Others said they see a persona too calibrated. "There's no question she's competent and very intelligent, but people want to see authentic human beings, and she has overly managed herself," said Peter Brooks, 68, a professor of English at the University of Virginia and a liberal Democrat who has an unfavorable view of Clinton.
As we've mentioned many times, '08, in political terms, is a long way off. Clinton has pretty successfully reframed herself politically, at least for now (once an opposing candidate gets ahold of her, it will be interesting how long the veneer lasts). But this perception of her persona may be a much more difficult task than reframing her politically.

That brings us to the 2nd law of politics as articulated by Rhodes Cook:
"All things being equal, style trumps substance in many ways," he said.
And it is this Clinton's style, unlike her husband's, which is a detriment instead of an asset.

A Clinton candidacy will turn the right out as no other candidate could, regardless of whether "Bush fatigue" or disgust with Republicans in general is evident or not.

Unless she and her staff can figure out how to present her as a more personal and less aloof and calculating persona, Hillary Clinton is, at best, a 48% candidate in a national election.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Heh. To snark - she and her staff must calculate, how to appear less calculating.
Written By: Dave
URL: http://
Just stay cool everybody. Inspite of the wavering in the polls and elite openionstoday, Hillary Clinton will have won support of three quarters of the voters by 2008. Imagine how good a president she could make banking on the eight years she led one former president whatever you percieve.
Written By: Gezahegn Negash
URL: http://
Yo men! Real good stuff! Appreciate it men! adolescenti lesbiche porno story cazzo grande ragazze sesso ragazze foto ragazze eccitate ragazze disponibili ragazze disinibite ragazze nere cazzo cavallo
Written By: Hollyfnm
Hi dude! Cool site, good job! donne lesbiche eiaculazione anale esercizi pene transessuali nudi estate ragazzi trailer porno tette spiaggia thai porno tette spagnole erotic lesbo
Written By: Jaimepcq
Hi everybody! Wanna see my cool pages? ragazze ucraine ragazze grasse ragazze giapponesi new porno nudi fare pompini fat porno ragazze escort cazzi lunghi super cazzo
Written By: Lisazgw
URL: desk3 [url=]desk4[/url] [link=]desk6[/link]
Written By: Iandvr

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks