Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Qana: Not the IDF?
Posted by: Dale Franks on Monday, July 31, 2006

The chief of staff of the Israeli Air Force is questioning whether the IDF was, in fact, responsible for the civilian deaths at Qana.
There is an unexplained gap of about seven hours between the one Israeli air strike that hit the Qana building housing the civilians, which took place around 1 A.M. Sunday, and the first report that the building had collapsed, said the chief of staff of the Israel Air Force, Brigadier General Amir Eshel. Speaking at a press conference at the Kirya military complex in Tel Aviv last night, Eshel said that of three Israeli air strikes on Qana early Sunday, only the first strike hit the building in which the civilians were staying. The other two hit areas at least 400 meters away.

"I can't say whether the house collapsed at 12 A.M. or at 8 A.M.," said Eshel. "According to foreign press reports, and this is one of the reports we are relying on, the house collapsed at 8 A.M. We do not have testimony regarding the time of the collapse. If the house collapsed at 12 A.M., it is difficult for me to believe that they waited eight hours to evacuate it."
The Israelis, in other words, are questioning the timing of the building's collapse. They are also hinting that such civilian deaths are an inevitable result of Hezbollah's policy of using civilians as human shields.
IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz and other senior officers expressed regret yesterday over the deaths of the civilians. They said the IDF was not aware that the civilians were in the village and had expected them to leave Qana the week before, following Israeli warnings of an impending attack.

Eisencott blamed Hezbollah for the deaths, saying the group uses the civilian population as a human shield.
The time difference between the air strike and the building's collapse has led to speculation that either Hezbollah induced the collapse to scapegoat Israel, or that the building's damage led to a delayed collapse.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I rather doubt that Hezbollah collapsed the building. It wouldn’t be the first building to collapse hours, days, or even weeks after being damaged. That is why damaged buildings are often condemned; they are structually unsound and dangerous. It happens in this country after every hurricane`and major earthquake. A few months ago there was a building collapse in Baltimore, for no obvious reason.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
There is an unexplained gap of about seven hours between the one Israeli air strike that hit the Qana building housing the civilians, which took place around 1 A.M. Sunday ....
So the IDF knows not only the structures it hits, but when it hits them. (So what about that UN post?) Was the building a command post? Were rockets being fired from the building? Did the IDF know civilians were in the building? Did it know for a fact there weren’t?

Time would be better spent discussing what the IDR knew and when it knew it. Instead, we get the backdoor speculation combined with numerous inferences based on said speculation.

So why hasn’t the IDF disclosed the specifics of what it knew about the building and what it did not, instead of engaging in the parlor game it is presently playing?

A pox on both Hezbollah and Israel. But at least I know my tax dollars do not arm Hezbollah. It makes me mad that my government is giving weapons to a government in the Middle East that uses thoses weapons to kill civilians. Sure Israel can defend itself, whatever that means. (Of course the defintiion of "self defense" has been debased by the Bush administration.) Just don’t do it on my nickel, ok?
 
Written By: mkultra
URL: http://
It’s pretty clear in this case that self defence means eliminating those people that are firing rockets into your territory....
 
Written By: Blewyn
URL: http://blewog.blogspot.com
A pox on both Hezbollah and Israel.
MKKK-

Moral equivilance at it’s finest.

SAD SAD SAD.

Mel Gibson would be proud
 
Written By: Shark
URL: http://
MK-

Give me a 1 word answer. No obfuscation. No pontification. No ambiguity. Give me an answer to this question:

Do you believe the IDF is deliberately targeting civilians?

YES or NO please.

 
Written By: Shark
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider