|
6 to 8 month’s? But I have it on the highest authority that the war is right around the corner! |
| |
Written By:
Lance
URL:
www.asecondhandconjecture.com
|
|
That’s just mean, Lance. ;) |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
|
I heard someone moaning about that the other day. ;) |
| |
Written By:
capt joe
URL:
http://
|
Show me a sailor who wouldn’t bitch about depolying and I’ll show you an uncommon sailor.
That would be the sailors from 7th fleet stationed in Sasebo. The guys in Yoko have it pretty good but would rather be underway than in sasebo. |
| |
Written By:
Mac
URL:
http://
|
Here are Ray McGovern’s qualifications as a source on the subject of the Bush administration’s plans for Iran (per the Wikipedia article that McQ linked):McGovern was a mid level officer in the CIA in the 1960s where his focus was analysis of Soviet policy toward Vietnam. Anyone who has spent any time exploring the Alice in Wonderland world of the internet Left will recognize the "career CIA man" as a familiar recurring character. For example, there is "28 year career CIA man" Bill Christison, who is ubiquitously quoted on the Left explaining the "root causes" of al Qaeda terrorism (US support for Israel), despite the fact that he retired from the CIA before al Qaeda was even created. Christison’s other area of expertise is explaining why 9/11 had to have been an "inside job" that used "controlled demolitions" to bring down the WTC towers. |
| |
Written By:
Aldo
URL:
http://
|
|
It is only mean if people follow the links and read them. Maybe you should delete that comment, some things should just be kept within the family;^} |
| |
Written By:
Lance
URL:
www.asecondhandconjecture.com
|
It is only mean if people follow the links and read them. Maybe you should delete that comment, some things should just be kept within the family;^} a. Too late b. I don’t know about mean, but it was seriously funny... |
| |
Written By:
err
URL:
http://
|
Inactivist???
That blogger seem rather active in the anti-Bush cursade. |
| |
Written By:
bains
URL:
http://
|
Inactivist???
That blogger seem rather active in the anti-Bush cursade. Just what the world needs: one more anti-Bush blog. |
| |
Written By:
Aldo
URL:
http://
|
|
The presence of a carrier battle group would not preclude the use of long-range bombers. It could be a jointness thing, or the Navy aircraft would support the AF bombers and provide a search and rescue capability. Of course one battle group seems to be a bit thin. But hey, who am I do disagree with experts like McGovern? |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
Of course, one battle group can carry MORE than plenty of nukes.... and I suspect there’s plenty of "nuclear accidents" waiting to happen when 7th century minds play with 20th century science. About damn time, too.
"Real nice country you got there in Dirkadirkastan; be a shame if something happened to it..." |
| |
Written By:
SDN
URL:
http://
|
Ok, let’s take this comment, "To impose the sanctions by denying ingress and egress to Iranian ports. Let’s face it, if they can’t ship oil through the Straits of Hormuz, they’re out of business."
Wouldn’t we need UN approval to oppose sanctions on Iran? Wouldn’t not doing so break international law? Won’t there be some major international players that will have a major problem with that? Maybe North Korea, Russia, and China to name a few. Do we really want to unite these countries in a common cause? Do you think the recent deployments may be freaking out North Korea, causing them to state recently that they will be testing a nuclear weapon? This is insanity. I guarantee that if we attack Iran, or even attempt to impose major sanctions without UN approval, we may be biting off more than we can chew.
|
| |
Written By:
shayolgul
URL:
http://
|
Wouldn’t we need UN approval to oppose sanctions on Iran? If you’ll read carefully, the whole post is based on that premise.
If you notice the two other parts of the Q&A just before that which you cite they say:Really? What else could it be?
Oh, I don’t know, preparations to enforce sanctions against Iran should they be passed?
Sanctions?
Yeah, you know, the UN has been talking about imposing santions against Iran if they don’t stop enriching uranium. And apparently there seems to be some momentum building to actually do something.
|
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|