Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Married with Children = more Republicans
Posted by: McQ on Friday, September 29, 2006

This is fascinating stuff (well, if you're a political junkie and don't have a life).

USA Today does a comparison of percent married in a district and which party represents the district.
• Republicans control 49 of the 50 districts with the highest rates of married people.

•Democrats represent all 50 districts that have the highest rates of adults who have never married.
The top 25 for Republicans see the range of those married from 61.9% to 66.1%. On the other end, the bottom 25 districts, all controlled by Dems have marriage rates ranging from 34.5% to 43.5%.

What's fascinating about this is rarely do you see such clean breaks in this sort of data.

But wait there's more. How about children?
Republican House members overwhelmingly come from districts that have high percentages of married people and lots of children, according to a USA TODAY analysis of 2005 Census Bureau data released last month.

GOP Congress members represent 39.2 million children younger than 18, about 7 million more than Democrats. Republicans average 7,000 more children per district.

Many Democrats represent areas that have many single people and relatively few children. Democratic districts that have large numbers of children tend to be predominantly Hispanic or, to a lesser extent, African-American.
Apparently the bottom line is "married with children" is good for Republicans and not-married and fewer children favors Democrats.

And you wonder why Republicans talk about family values and are against abortions. [/snark]
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Talk is cheap.
 
Written By: VRB
URL: http://
Talk is cheap.
You wouldn’t think so from that comment...
 
Written By: Mark A. Flacy
URL: http://
You wouldn’t think so from that comment...
I don’t know what you mean. Just because one talks of values does not mean your family is not disfuctional or that you are more moral than any one else. Whenever I hear something like that study, I feel that Republicans would think if I vote Democratic; I don’t have a value system, was a single parent or somehow morally inferior to them. It is just a more sophisticated way of name calling. It pisses me off, so I can only complain where I have the ability to protest. A person like me does not ever get the chance to comfront these attitudes or statistics in the national media.
 
Written By: VRB
URL: http://
So, in your view, it’s insulting to observe what exists?

 
Written By: Bithead
URL: http://
I don’t know what you mean.
A 3 word comment stating "talk is cheap"...oh, never mind.
 
Written By: Mark A. Flacy
URL: http://
Bithead,
It is if I called you stupid, because you responded to my comment.
 
Written By: VRB
URL: http://
Talk may be cheap. The real issue would be whether words used for commenting are expensive.
 
Written By: triticale
URL: http://triticale.mu.nu

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider