Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Living and Working in DC...or not.
Posted by: Jon Henke on Thursday, December 07, 2006

I understand the difficulty of working in a place many hundreds, maybe even thousands, of miles from your family, your constituents and your home — and I'm no fan of Congress being in session more than is absolutely necessary — but this comment by Rep. Jack Kingston was tone-deaf and misguided.
"Keeping us up here eats away at families," said Rep. Jack Kingston (R-Ga.), who typically flies home on Thursdays and returns to Washington on Tuesdays. "Marriages suffer. The Democrats could care less about families — that's what this says."
On the one hand, exactly how much work gets done in session? I don't know, but it could be that the amount of work is fairly fungible. You can stretch it over 5 days, or you can prepare for it and do it in 2-3, leaving time to visit family and constituents, and to study up on the issues on which you'll vote. And Kingston's response to all of this is worth understanding:


On the other hand, the idea that it's asking too much of Congressmen to work 5 days a week is absurd; presumably, Congressional staffers (even those with family out of town) are asked to work 5 day weeks or more. Plus, more time in session and in DC means less time fundraising...and to the extent that less time fundraising minimizes the incumbent advantage, it's a plus in my book.

That said, the response at DailyKos illuminates everything that's wrong with partisan punditry...
our elected officials will have to actually work for their salaries. I had no idea that they were such proponents of a 3-day workweek. I'm sure they'll be writing legislation to give the rest of us that right, what with them being all "pro-family" and all.

Apparently, it also says that there's a law against members moving their families to Washington D.C.
As Tim Chapman points out at his excellent policy blog, there's some raging hypocrisy going on here.
[A]side from the expense of [moving your family to DC], there are political considerations, namely that political opportunists like Kos will use it as a way to attack you. Remember the vitriolic attacks against Rick Santorum? Santorum did move his family to DC because he wanted to be close to his young kids. But he received nothing but criticism from the Kos crowd. Witness this post from Daily Kos in which Santorum was criticized for exactly this issue
When a Senator did move his family to DC, what did the DailyKos blogger write? That "If you are not a resident of the state, you aren’t allowed to run for the U.S. Senate", that "Santorum needs to convince the voters of Pennsylvania that he lives among them and not just an out-of-towner who used to live here when he was first elected" and that they should investigate the family's home ownership background. That's only the tip of the "Rick Santorum doesn't live in PA anymore, get him!" iceberg at DailyKos, as well as in the blogosphere and mainstream media.

Damned if you don't, investigated if you do.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

This is why the country will continue to become more and more partisan. They are most interested in winning and power by whatever means / distortions (reference mk). Sometimes it makes you wonder what deficiency the MKUltra crowd is trying to make up for?? To many dodgeballs to the head in gym?? Sorry, Not!

By the way MKUltra I’m for traffic circles purely for the political reason that it is basically a constant "right" turn.
Written By: coaster
URL: http://
Shrugs.Not only do I think there should be more members in the house (1 per ~30K citizens), but I see no real reason for any of them to go to Washington.

There’s lots of unlit fiber-optics out there. Use it.
Written By: Mark A. Flacy
URL: http://
While I’m generally disposed to bash Congress, I think this thread is a misunderstanding of the way it works. When they’re at home, they’re not generally on the golf course (some are, but rogues inhabit every discipline.)

Instead, they often go from meeting to grand opening to fundraiser and back. Most of what Congress does isn’t sitting in the hall listening to speeches, or sitting in committee rooms hearing testimony. It’s "other". Only the "rock star" reps get to take it easy, and those that do risk losing that status. It’s a grueling life.
Written By: Larry
URL: http://
No kidding Larry. Aside from the fact that I’d generally like to see Congress meet even less (fewer opportunities for mischief), the LAST thing we need is for members to spend less time in their districts, and more time in Washington. I thought that was what the netroots wanted, after all — y’know, more grassroots, people-powered politics and whatnot.
Written By: Sean

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks