This isn’t really a partisan or ideological failure. I will agree with this statement to the extent that it is limited to earmarks, but I think there is a built-in institutional imperative with the Democratic party for government spending.
Aside from plaintiff’s attorneys, the largest source of funding and grass-roots support for the Democrats comes from public employee unions. These unions, in turn, get their funding from union dues that are are deducted from the paychecks of government employees. Follow the money: for the Democrats, cutting government spending is the equivalent of de-funding their own party. |
| |
Written By:
Aldo
URL:
http://
|
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
Be prepared for more "surprises" as changing the (R) to a (D) has little effect on the growth of government.
Of course earmarks are such a small part of government spending that eliminating them entirely would have almost no effect at all. |
| |
Written By:
DS
URL:
http://
|