Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Senate Dems want their pork
Posted by: mcq on Friday, January 12, 2007

As a prelude, the House Democrats have denied Republicans a voice in their 100 hour agenda, and have passed "tough" ethics reform including earmark reform (I put "tough" in quotes because it is a relative term and especially when you understand what happened in the Senate).

Now it is the Senate's turn. In the Senate, the rules won't allow one party to deny the other party debate or the ability to offer amendments. So not at all satisfied with the Democratic Senate version of the bill (Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007 (S. 1)) which had very weak earmark reform rules, Republican Senator Jim DeMint, a strong advocate of earmark reform, introduced an amendment (amendment 11) which essentially offered the Pelosi reforms from the House version of the bill.

The Senate Dems, apparently, went bats. Club for Growth takes it from there:
It was a very clever strategy. Dick Durbin, the Majority Whip, threw a fit on the Senate floor and offered a motion to table it (kill it).

Let's be clear about the rich irony here. Senate Leadership tried to kill a bill that House Leadership supported and passed. Harry Reid and Dick Durbin are basically saying that they want their pork no matter what, even if it embarrasses their own party.

So when the motion to kill the bill came to a vote, Durbin and the Democrats lost! [ed. note: At this point, the Senate erupted. The chair, who I think was Maria Cantwell, banged the gavel repeatedly to bring the room to order. The Democrats were frantically performing triage in an attempt to recover.]

It should be noted that a majority should never offer a motion to table if they aren’t sure they can win. It was very embarrassing. Especially since Durbin was trying to kill a proposal that his Leadership colleagues in the House offered!

Anyways, after the motion failed, DeMint asked for a voice vote, which is common. It's basically used to save time since de facto support of the bill was decided when the motion failed. However, Big Ted Kennedy objected, which is all that it needed to skip a voice vote.
Heh ... very funny and very revealing.

Two updates are interesting as well:
UPDATE (4:29pm): It should be noted that Senate Democratic freshmen, Jim Webb and Jon Tester, voted with Republicans to not kill the proposal. Will Reid successfully whip them into changing their vote?
A little independence exhibited immediately could turn into a lot of independence down the road. Look for some real arm twisting by Reid and Durbin on this.

And I also found this update interesting:
UPDATE (4:34pm): Harry Reid is talking right now. He just said that DeMint's proposal is disrupting the overall bill, which took a lot of time to put together. He just said that the weak earmark reform rules "were carefully vetted with weeks of work from our staff" and that it's "preferrable" to DeMint's proposal.
Yes, we must reward the staff's hard work by passing the bad legislation they've crafted. Amazing. And as is obvious, It wasn't "carefully vetted" by DeMint (or Webb and Tester).

This is an interesting vote in many ways. It's been put off now until today. You can follow it here.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

And the degree to which conservative Dems cross the aisle in the Senate shows the degree to which you did in fact get just what you want in the 2006 polling*—the houses of Congress divided from each other.

Good on you when it works out that way.

Bad on you when it doesn’t.

Yours, TDP, ml, msl, & pfpp

Written By: Tom Perkins
URL: http://
Well, the stuff in the election was all talk off course since the Dems like their pork just as much as the republicans
Written By: capt joe
URL: http://
Looks like Reid is giving up
Written By: ChrisB
URL: http://
I love this, you just can’t make this crap up!

:::grabbing popcorn and settling in::::
Written By: Rick Day

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks