Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Always glad to be among the "nuts" when Taylor Marsh is speaking
Posted by: McQ on Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Yes, apparently the post about the "Fairness Doctrine" hit home among some of the more extreme on the left:
But the Fairness Doctrine is back or at least being talked about again, with Congress set to challenge the FCC. The thought is already driving conservatives nuts, with more here, here, here, here, here, with Jeff Goldstein his usual obtuse self. QandO offers more. One blogger calls it Free Speech’s Abu Ghraib. They're all nuts. They're also very happy with controlling the radio waves.
Now I bring this up not necessarily because she called all those who abhor further government intrusion and control "nuts". I've been called worse by better people.

No, I'm more interested in using it to illustrate that liberals such as Marsh are really statist wolves in liberty sheep's clothing. It is also further proof that a liberal/libertarian fusion is impossible.

Marsh spins the "need" for a reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine this way:
The short version of the Fairness Doctrine is that in 1987 Reagan had it scuttled. Shortly after that Rush Limbaugh began his journey and right-wing radio was created and gradually took over the airwaves, with the help of their corporate friends, while the Democrats were still trying to figure out direct mail. I'm exaggerating, but Democrats were so dense about radio for so long it's amazing there are still any progressive hosts out here working every day to get back on radio. As I've written many times, the Republicans have used radio to pump up emotion and GOTV. In case you haven't noticed, radio works. Just ask Karl Rove, who has worked and worked and worked it. It's about getting control of all the little stations in all the little towns so that you can influence all those people. The host gets to know his/her audience, they trust him/her, so when this host tells them to vote for Right Wing Randy/Roxanne, they likely will. After all, they've built up a trust. Republicans will do anything to get ratings, which includes leaving the facts out and plying their audience with daily doses of emotion instead. Democrats are still behind in radio, trying to reinvent the wheel instead of using their donor base to help hosts who could hold their own. Creating Democratic business consortiums that help hosts get on the air, with the best of us staying on and eventually catapulting to syndication. The Fairness Doctrine could really make a difference. Why do you think conservatives are screaming like crazy?
In case you missed it, Marsh is a liberal radio talk show host. Obviously unable to garner a Limbaugh-size audience on her own, she's content to blame her own marginal status on the designs of, wait for it, Karl Rove and the right-wing's "corporate friends". She obviously believes that the only thing keeping her from the same success as Limbaugh has nothing to do with her and everything to do with that evil Karl Rove and those nasty corporations out there.

It's almost a pro-forma argument that may be emotionally satisfying to the likes of Marsh, but is neither particularly smart or honest. Corporations push what sells. That's how they make money. If Taylor Marsh had the ability and the message which compared favorably to Limbaugh's one has to ask why a corporation wouldn't be selling that in the radio market place? Well of course they would. Money isn't blue or red ... it's green.

The whole premise behind launching Air America was that there was a market for such a format and that it would sell. Now there are obviously problems with AA's approach to the market and that it appears to have been undercapitalized, so it's not clear at this point that the premise is false. But it also appears that AA wasn't that successful in attracting listeners either.

Ironically, what those like Marsh - who are always caterwauling about conservative assaults on liberty - want is for government to "level the playing field" by making an assault on liberty. She's all for using it's power of coercion to force those who have developed a successful format within the radio talk market to include those who've basically failed.

The Taylor Marsh's of the world are perfectly content to use the government's power to get their message out because, in a competitive market, they've proven unable to do so.

Markets. They don't need no stinkin' markets ... not when they have government to make up for their failures.

So when Marsh says ...
Republicans will do anything to get ratings, which includes leaving the facts out and plying their audience with daily doses of emotion instead.
... you just have to shake your head. The irony of such a statement, given her argument for government intrusion, is simply staggering and apparently completely lost on her.

But then, that really comes as no surprise.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Scratch a leftist, find a gulag.
Written By: T
URL: http://
Marsh’s contention seems to be that since conservatives are better at using radio as a medium, then they must be hobbled. I’m hoping there are some liberals with a shred of honesty who think this is a horrendous assault on free speech.

I chuckled at her brief history of the Fairness Doctrine, trying to show a causal relationship between Reagan scuttling it and Limbaugh launching his radio show.
Written By: steverino
The Left loves Hugo Chavez when he shuts down the opposition TV station. Their think tanks hail this as a victory for "democracy." And you are shocked when they call for it here? You are naive.
Written By: T
URL: http://
Did you notice she labelled you and Jeff as "Conservatives"?

What a maroon!
Written By: A fine scotch
URL: http://
She just wants affirmative action for liberals in the media...

As if there aren’t already enough liberals working in the media...

But, equal opportunity is never enough for them. If there aren’t equal outcomes, something foul is afoot.
Written By: Keith_Indy
NPR anyone?????
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
Did you notice she labelled you and Jeff as "Conservatives"?
If you don’t hold her opinion, then she figures you must be. You are lucky she didn’t call you neo cons or nazis
Written By: capt joe
URL: http://
I really love her response to Jeff Goldstein in her comments: "Anyway, I don’t expect you to understand the Fairness Doctrine. Conservatives today are actually not very well disguised fascists." Wow. Minus points for logic, but plus points for b*llsiness.
Written By: Joe R. the Unabrewer
"Conservatives today are actually not very well disguised fascists."

Gee willikers...who is the one trying to censor speech? Who is the one seeking control of the media? I think it’s clear who the national socialists would side with on media censorship.

Rule #1: Anyone who calls someone the word "fascist" is probably really the fascist.

Written By: T
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks