Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Senate Minimum Wage "setback"
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, January 25, 2007

You just have to learn to "appreciate" (see through?) reporting like this. According to the New York Times:
Prospects for an increase in the minimum wage suffered a setback today in the Senate, where a move fell short, at least for now, to raise the minimum by $2.10 an hour without tax breaks for small businesses.
Yes, that's just a horrible "setback", isn't it? And who's the only Senator quoted? Heh ...
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, expressed disappointment over the Senate vote. “Our colleagues in the House came together — Democrats and Republicans — and they passed a minimum wage bill with no strings attached,” he said.
Actually both Kennedy and the NYT both know why there were "no strings attached". That's because Democrats in the House refused to allow debate, consequently the bill either passed as written by the Dems or it didn't.
Low-wage workers “deserved the same respect from the Senate,” Mr. Kennedy said. “We should have passed this bill today and put it before the president for his signature this afternoon. We will not rest until we do right by working families.”
But one of the primary engines of the economy? Screw 'em. No word on whether Kennedy finds it equally important that the jobs necessary to pay this new wage continue to exist.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
i saw a headline that went something like. "Senate fails to pass bill to help the poor" or some such. Really lame.
 
Written By: josh b
URL: http://
First it was ethics and earmark reform. Now the minimum wage.
Has there been a "frontal lobotomy" between the two chambers ?
Reid is making the "first 100 hours" look like window dressing.

With the House drawing out the "first 100 hours" to new limits, perhaps we should consider paying Congress "by the hour."
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
i saw a headline that went something like. "Senate fails to pass bill to help the poor" or some such. Really lame.
I guess it’s no longer the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Republicans fault.

HAW HAW
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
Good wish,
but the media will still cast it as being "the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Republicans fault"
by failing to mention the at Senate is controlled by the Democrats.

Only when the Senate does or tries to do something "good" will it be mentioned that it is controlled by the Democrats.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Only reason it didn’t pass was because a Republican filibuster held. Who wants to take a guess that we’ll soon see editorials about those "eeeeevill Republican dirty tricks" written by the same folks who thought filibusters were the lifeblood of Democracy back in 2005?
 
Written By: SaveFarris
URL: http://
In other words, "is turnabout fair play"?

Ask your local Democrat!
 
Written By: Bryan Pick
URL: http://www.qando.net
If a REpublican was Speaker and had odd ties to companies not effected by this increase, you know damn well the papers would be loving how it didnt pass.
 
Written By: josh b
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider