|
i saw a headline that went something like. "Senate fails to pass bill to help the poor" or some such. Really lame. |
| |
Written By:
josh b
URL:
http://
|
First it was ethics and earmark reform. Now the minimum wage. Has there been a "frontal lobotomy" between the two chambers ? Reid is making the "first 100 hours" look like window dressing.
With the House drawing out the "first 100 hours" to new limits, perhaps we should consider paying Congress "by the hour." |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
i saw a headline that went something like. "Senate fails to pass bill to help the poor" or some such. Really lame. I guess it’s no longer the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Republicans fault.
HAW HAW |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
Good wish, but the media will still cast it as being "the eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil Republicans fault" by failing to mention the at Senate is controlled by the Democrats.
Only when the Senate does or tries to do something "good" will it be mentioned that it is controlled by the Democrats. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
|
Only reason it didn’t pass was because a Republican filibuster held. Who wants to take a guess that we’ll soon see editorials about those "eeeeevill Republican dirty tricks" written by the same folks who thought filibusters were the lifeblood of Democracy back in 2005? |
| |
Written By:
SaveFarris
URL:
http://
|
In other words, "is turnabout fair play"?
Ask your local Democrat! |
| |
Written By:
Bryan Pick
URL:
http://www.qando.net
|
|
If a REpublican was Speaker and had odd ties to companies not effected by this increase, you know damn well the papers would be loving how it didnt pass. |
| |
Written By:
josh b
URL:
http://
|