Bush slashes aid to the poor to boost Iraq war chest
BUDGET: Although the bill for the Iraq conflict is approaching the cost of the Vietnam war, Bush proposed a US$78 billion squeeze on medical care for the poor and elderly
—— This was the headline of the Taipei Times.
Any wonder why I stopped subscribing?
Inside the story...
The New York Times noted that the cost of the war would have paid for universal healthcare in the US, nursery education for all three and four-year-olds in the country, immunization for children around the world against a host of diseases, and still leave about half of the money left over.
So, let me ask, right after 9/11 did the NYT advocate slashing social programs to pay for the military funding we would need for Afghanistan? Why is it fungible in only one direction? |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
|
Interesting that Jefferson’s words closely follow the words of the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu. Lao Tzu cautioned the administrator to "do nothing" and the people are happy. |
| |
Written By:
kyle N
URL:
http://impudent.blognation.us/blog
|
I think the following is more or less accurate:
DOD, DHS & VA: 675 billion Medicare/Medicaid: 870 billion Interest on debt: 440 billion Soc. Sec. Admin: 622 billion
other large programs:
Dept. Ag.: 92 billion Dept. Ed.: 64 billion HUD: 44 billion Dept. Labor (mostly retraining, i think): 53 billion DOT: 65 billion Office Personnel Mgmt (pensions, mostly): 67 billion
see here
I don’t think this counts the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
|
| |
Written By:
Francis
URL:
http://
|
|
a few billion here, a few billion there, after a while you are talking about some real money. |
| |
Written By:
kyle N
URL:
http://impudent.blognation.us/blog
|
... and in 15 years it will all go for interest payments on the debt and social security.
The war ends when we run out of money. |
| |
Written By:
cindyb
URL:
http://
|