Why rule out taking military action against Iran in Iran? Isn’t (wasn’t?) a major plank of our post 9/11 mindset that we go after those who seek to do us harm, no matter where they might be?
Al Qaeda wasn’t attacking us in Afghanistan, they were using Afghanistan as a base from which to launch attacks against us... so we justifiably went after them there.
Not going after Iran on the Iranian side of the border will lead to more Americans being killed. As a tactical matter, going after the depots and staging grounds will be more productive than limiting ourselves to trying to intercept the shipments that come across the border (The War on Drugs illustrates this: it’s impossible to intercept everything).
And why should we think Iran will ever think we’re serious about ’persuading’ them to stop their support for the insurgents if we limit our response to such half-hearted efforts? Isn’t the point to hit our enemies harder than they’re hitting us? |
| |
Written By:
steve
URL:
http://
|
Why rule out taking military action against Iran in Iran? What part of this didn’t you understand?But I am saying that in the case of Iran, it is important that a) we don’t take any option off the table (whether we seriously considering it or not) and b) that a united front against Iran be forged at all levels and branches of government (that’s the most effective way to neutralize them). |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
Well Chris Dodd says your wrong.
He, in his own sniving way, just wants to be loved. He was fooled on Iraq, and wants to be fooled again. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
What part of this didn’t you understand? I don’t know, maybe the part where you wrote (my bold): "But a serious diplomatic and military effort (within Iraq, not Iran)" |
| |
Written By:
steve
URL:
http://
|
It seems to me that a preferable option would be to finish up the ground wars as soon as possible and let the world know we will not tolerate any terrorist support by anyone. Then if we have credible information of terrorist activities in any country, send in a missile or drop a smart bomb to prove our point. We’ve done this in the past with little more than indignant propaganda from the usual sources.
I can’t speak with any authority on this, but I’d like to hear what some of you who can speak with authority think. |
| |
Written By:
Phil
URL:
http://
|
I don’t know, maybe the part where you wrote (my bold): "But a serious diplomatic and military effort (within Iraq, not Iran)" Yeah, as a first step. As something to do immediately. But doing so doesn’t preclude military action against Iran, if necessary, in the future. Thus the point about "don’t take any option off the table". |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
|
I stand corrected. Glad to see you haven’t gone soft. |
| |
Written By:
steve
URL:
http://
|
|
This is probably all a Karl Rove plot to implicate Iran. I learned that on the "loose change" thread . . . |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
Then if we have credible information of terrorist activities in any country, send in a missile or drop a smart bomb to prove our point. We’ve done this in the past with little more than indignant propaganda from the usual sources. You mean like we did in the Sudan and Afghanistan and Iraq under Clinton...wow THAT really defeated Terrorism, unless you discount the escalating violence of Al Qaeda.
IF you blow up my buildings does that increase the cost of supporting Terror to such an intolerable level that you will forego terrorism? The track record is "NO". Now when the regimes that tolerated Terrorists are replaced the Terrorist leave...but that requires actually being willing to make some sort of sacrifice on a sustained basis. |
| |
Written By:
Joe
URL:
http://
|
|
Devil’s advocate here; did Pace say what he said because he doesn’t want the administration to go after Iran when we still have much unfinished business? I know Pace and the rest of the JCS fought hard to get the administration take nuclear weapons off the table for Iran as Bush felt they were just another weapon (Sort of like phosgene). Or, is Pace sending the msg to Iran that Ahmadinajad is out of control and despite their apparant attempts to reign him in, the Iranian administration needs to put this boy out in the cold? Either way, what are the chances Pace gets his walking papers over this? |
| |
Written By:
civdiv
URL:
http://
|
|
It looks like some of those EDs aren’t I anymore. Do we go back to Mines and Booby Traps now? |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|