You seem suprised. |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://
|
You seem suprised. I’m not. |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
Uh, violent home intruders are subject to being shot. These so-called conservatives were remiss in not being armed and doing their duty . . . |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
|
Andrew Stone? I wonder if he has a Frisch in the woodpile. |
| |
Written By:
cjd
URL:
http://
|
He could have been a "peace" activist. Or perhaps he was just "anti-war". Or both. Labeler!
[heh! I plan on getting a lot of mileage out of that just so you know ;)] |
| |
Written By:
MichaelW
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
It’s been coming to that for a long time, Bruce.
Adjust your specs, mate, and start looking down the road as far as you can.
You’ll see it coming. |
| |
Written By:
Billy Beck
URL:
http://www.two—four.net/weblog.php
|
The problem that scares me here is, had it been me, .25 seconds after he threw the first punch he would have found himself 10mm / .357" closer to God.
How asinine do you have to be to risk your life over friggin’ politics? Showing up at someone’s door angry and unannounced is just asking for trouble.
I am swarmed by hard-core leftists here at work, and we’re never uncivil. At least the work environment keeps them primarily non-frothy. But none of them ever accost me out in the parking lot or follow me home. |
| |
Written By:
Robb Allen
URL:
http://blog.robballen.com
|
Yes, and Dem activists shot-out windows of GOP campain headquarters in 2004, slashed tires and stole signs. Pro-war demonstrators have been beat-up and spat at. A poster on Indimedia went on a murder rampage as "protest."
But don’t forget that Bushtler is responsible for creating a "climate of fear."
Also — reprinting the words of leftist bloggers who go to work for Dem candidates is "hate speech" and "crushing dissent" and the same as sending "death threats."
Actual death threats are probably considered "free expression" by these creatures... |
| |
Written By:
TBone
URL:
http://
|
|
It’s just the beginning. |
| |
Written By:
Dave Schuler
URL:
http://www.theglitteringeye.com
|
It’s just the beginning. I’m not too worried. Conservatives tend to have more guns. |
| |
Written By:
steverino
URL:
http://steverino.journalspace.com/
|
Pro-war demonstrators I wonder what the signs these people carry around say? |
| |
Written By:
Ugh
URL:
http://
|
Hence why I live in the Gunshine state where this is not the case. In Florida, you’re even allowed to protect yourself from someone you’ve invited in if they decide to attack you.
The Castle Doctrine is just sound, logical thinking. And, just like owning a firearm, I will always refuse to comply with any law that states otherwise. |
| |
Written By:
Robb Allen
URL:
http://blog.robballen.com
|
Wulf from Atlas Blogged points me to a post he did yesterday which, to say the least, should discourage such a reaction. This might also discourage such a reaction: Farmer shot by deputy accused |
| |
Written By:
Dan
URL:
http://
|
And that’s why I live in Indiana, and wouldn’t think twice about moving anywhere else...IC 35-41-3-2 Use of force to protect person or property 35-41-3-2 Sec. 2. (a) A person is justified in using reasonable force against another person to protect the person or a third person from what the person reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person: (1) is justified in using deadly force; and (2) does not have a duty to retreat; if the person reasonably believes that that force is necessary to prevent serious bodily injury to the person or a third person or the commission of a forcible felony. No person in this state shall be placed in legal jeopardy of any kind whatsoever for protecting the person or a third person by reasonable means necessary. Yep, That’s a threat to use force in reaction to a violent person in my home or elsewhere, against my wife or I (or anyone else that happens to be around.)
But, I’m sure there are some who would consider that a threat against them. Which is easily solved, don’t come to me, picking a fight. |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com/
|
|
Virginia does follow the Castle Doctrine. The legislation that was just shot down (no pun intended) in committee concerned protection from civil liability. We’re already protected from criminal liability. |
| |
Written By:
MichaelW
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
|
MichaelW, thanks for clarifying that - the article I linked to explained that, but my post didn’t make the distinction. |
| |
Written By:
Wulf
URL:
http://www.atlasblogged.com
|
Of course there is always the old saw to fall back on, which goes "I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6". Some certain truth to that, although possibly not in this particular case. Then there is the three-S rule: Shoot, Shovel, Shutup.
|
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
Why I live in Texas #325764876.
|
| |
Written By:
SDN
URL:
http://
|
|
This thread is great. |
| |
Written By:
Bryan Pick
URL:
http://www.qando.net
|
MichaelW, thanks for clarifying that - the article I linked to explained that, but my post didn’t make the distinction. No problem, Wulf. I meant to clarify at Atlas Blogged, but I was too lazy to do the registration thing. I figured you’d get around to it. |
| |
Written By:
MichaelW
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
This home invader must have been a real bad-ass having served in Bosnia/Kosovo/Somalia/Haiti etc.
I mean, he’s no chicken-hawk right? He signed up for all of those adventures.
Did I miss any? |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
More about this here, the link suggested by Instapundit.
Yours, TDP, ml, msl, & pfpp |
| |
Written By:
Tom Perkins
URL:
http://
|