|
Well it IS...and if he and Paul Krugman keep predicitng one every six months, six months out from the prediction, they’ll be right...one day. |
| |
Written By:
Joe
URL:
http://
|
I think a slowdown is pretty much baked into the cake over the next 18-24 months. I can’t say about an actual recession, but profit margins (at record levels) will likely contract. That means a likely slowdown in earnings growth. Employment will still be strong for a while, as will compensation growth (which has been rising rapidly and increasing pressure on profit margins.) The risk is that along with the housing recession (and if history is a guide, which is a dangerous assumption if better than nothing, it has a good ways to go in both depth and length) the earnings slowdown could lead to asset falls, specifically stocks. If both stocks and housing fall, consumer spending could slow down as savings out of income increase and cause the downward pressures to feed on themselves. Of course there are always the unexpected shocks which happen far more often than standard theory suggests they should.
Given the fundamentals I would be more optimistic, but overvalued assets with skinny risk premiums have led to many a financial crises. I am not talking about a meltdown like the depression, but a recession something like 1991 and the beginning of this decade driven by financial issues due to too many people with too much leverage dependent on a very stable economy. Last year was the only year in my memory where every country had positive economic growth. Truly extraordinary. People are making financial bets that that kind of widespread, positive stability will continue. I hope they are right but I am betting they are proven unwise over the next 24 months. |
| |
Written By:
Lance
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
Of course this is like predicting sunrise in many cases. Two things that are as sure as sunrise:
1. We will eventually go back into a recession phase of the business cycle.
2. If Bush is still President it will be blamed on "Bushinomics." |
| |
Written By:
Aldo
URL:
http://
|
|
Please, even if Bush isn’t president it will still be blamed on Bushinomics. |
| |
Written By:
Jeff the Baptist
URL:
http://jeffthebaptist.blogspot.com
|
|
Weakness in the USD only lingering effect of Bushinomics, internal economy looks strong. |
| |
Written By:
unaha-closp
URL:
http://warisforwinning.blogspot.com/
|
|
Count me with Lance on this one... I think the housing bubble will get the soft landing they need, but only because I expect the Fed to inflate us out of that. But right now everyone is leveraged all over the place, expecting nice, stable growth. The situation is fine, as long as it remains stable. Any big hiccups, though (terrorist attack, major oil spike, or rash of foreclosures), and we could be in for trouble. |
| |
Written By:
Brad Warbiany
URL:
http://unrepentantindividual.com/
|
|
Weakness in the USD has more to due with lacking of national savings, and our propensity to import tons of stuff. |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
only because I expect the Fed to inflate us out of that. That is certainly one possibility, but the fed is walking some tricky waters on that. Right now the trade deficit is behaving itself a bit better. Unsurprisingly we now see inflation picking up and running higher than the feds target of 1-2%. Falling housing and rising inflation put the fed in a bit of a bind. It would be easy to make a mistake in that case, which the fed has made many times before. Not a job I would want. |
| |
Written By:
Lance
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
Weakness in the USD has more to due with lacking of national savings, and our propensity to import tons of stuff. The value of the US Dollar, and every other currency on the planet, is a function of how many of those pieces of paper their respective central banks print. There is no historical correlation between trade deficits and the value of the currency to support such a theory. |
| |
Written By:
DS
URL:
http://
|